Get insider access
Preferred store
Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
Notice: We're looking for passionate writers and testers to join our team. Apply now!

Dell Alienware AW3225QF Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v2.0.1
Review updated Mar 27, 2025 at 11:56 am
Latest change: Writing modified Apr 08, 2025 at 03:06 pm
Dell Alienware AW3225QF Picture
9.0
PC Gaming
9.0
Console Gaming
8.2
Office
9.3
Editing
6.8
Brightness
9.7
Response Time
9.4
HDR Picture
10
SDR Picture
9.6
Color Accuracy
  1. Recommended in 4 articles:
  2. Curved Gaming
  3. Curved
  4. Brands
  5. Dell

The Dell AW3225QF is a premium 4k 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor. It competes with a number of other 32-inch QD-OLEDs, such as the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED, the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P, and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD S32DG80, though the Dell is unique among these in having a curved screen. It has features common with 32-inch QD-OLEDs, such as support for all VRR formats and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. However, it also has some less common features, such as Dolby Vision support and an eARC/ARC port to digitally connect a soundbar or receiver.

Our Verdict

9.0 PC Gaming

The Dell AW3225QF is outstanding for PC gaming. It has a near-instantaneous response time that results in crisp motion, and it has low input lag for a responsive feel. Its near-infinite contrast ratio and perfect black uniformity are also ideal for dark room gaming, and blacks look deep and inky. It also gets bright enough for highlights to pop, and colors look vivid. While it supports all common VRR formats to reduce screen tearing, there's noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is disappointing if your PC can't maintain consistent frame rates.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks.
  • Perfect black uniformity.
  • 240Hz refresh rate and VRR support.
  • Near-instantaneous response time.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates.
  • Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.

9.0 Console Gaming

The Dell AW3225QF is remarkable for console gaming. It has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and supports 4k signals up to 120Hz from the PS5, PS5 Pro, and Xbox Series X|S. It delivers outstanding gaming performance thanks to its near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. It also provides outstanding picture quality with deep and inky blacks, as well as bright and vivid colors. However, while it has a low input lag at 120Hz, which Xbox can use across games, it's not as responsive as some other monitors at 60Hz, which is used in some PS5 games.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks.
  • Near-instantaneous response time.
  • HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.

8.2 Office

The Dell AW3225QF is great for office work but has some limitations. Its large screen makes it easy to multitask, and its high 4k resolution helps produce excellent text clarity. It also has wide viewing angles and decent ergonomics, making it easy to share your screen with someone else. And while it doesn't get extremely bright in SDR, it's still bright enough for use in a moderately-lit room and has incredible reflection handling. That said, OLEDs like this one are prone to burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, which you may encounter with productivity programs and taskbars.

Pros
  • Incredible reflection handling.
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Excellent text clarity.
Cons
  • Risk of burn-in.
  • USB-C doesn't support DisplayPort Alt Mode.
9.3 Editing

The Dell AW3225QF is fantastic for content creation. It has remarkable accuracy in its sRGB picture mode, so you don't need to calibrate it, and it displays a wide range of vivid colors. Its high 4k resolution displays crisp images, but its slightly curved screen may take some time to get used to if you've never used a curved display before. It also has okay SDR brightness, and while it doesn't get bright enough to fight bright glare, it's still fine with a few lights around and has incredible reflection handling. It has some downsides, though, as OLEDs like this are prone to burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.

Pros
  • Incredible reflection handling.
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Excellent text clarity.
  • Deep and inky blacks.
  • Remarkable accuracy before calibration.
Cons
  • Risk of burn-in.
  • USB-C doesn't support DisplayPort Alt Mode.
  • Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.

6.8 Brightness

The Dell AW3225QF has okay brightness. It's fine if you have a few lights around, but it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare. Small highlights in HDR also pop against the rest of the image, but larger highlights are dimmer.

Pros
  • Small highlights stand out.
Cons
  • Not bright enough to fight intense glare.

9.7 Response Time

The Dell AW3225QF has a near-instantaneous response time, resulting in exceptionally sharp motion.

Pros
  • Near-instantaneous response time.
  • Outstanding refresh rate compliance.
Cons
9.4 HDR Picture

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF monitor is outstanding for HDR. It displays a wide range of colors vividly, as well as deep blacks in a dark room. However, blacks appear slightly purple in rooms with a lot of ambient light.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks.
  • Perfect black uniformity.
  • Displays wide range of vivid colors.
Cons
10 SDR Picture

The Dell AW3225QF has outstanding SDR picture quality, as it displays deep and inky blacks as well as a wide range of colors.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks.
  • Displays wide range of vivid colors.
Cons
9.6 Color Accuracy

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF has exceptional color accuracy. It has remarkable accuracy before calibration, so calibration doesn't improve the accuracy much. It also maintains an accurate image across the screen thanks to its fantastic gray uniformity.

Pros
  • Remarkable accuracy before calibration.
  • Fantastic gray uniformity.
Cons
  • 9.0 PC Gaming
  • 9.0 Console Gaming
  • 8.2 Office
  • 9.3 Editing

Performance Usages

  • 6.8 Brightness
  • 9.7 Response Time
  • 9.4 HDR Picture
  • 10 SDR Picture
  • 9.6 Color Accuracy

Changelog

  1. Updated Apr 08, 2025:

    Added that the Dell Alienware AW2725Q has better text clarity.

  2. Updated Mar 27, 2025:

    The text in the review has been significantly updated to reflect changes in the market since it was first written.

  3. Updated Feb 25, 2025:

    We retested the input lag with Console Mode on and off with firmware M2B105 to see how the mode affects the input lag at different refresh rates.

  4. Updated Feb 21, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0.1. This includes a new test result for DisplayPort 2.1 Transmission Bandwidth.
  5. Updated Jul 26, 2024: Added that the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED delivers up to 90W of power over USB.
  6. Updated Jul 23, 2024: Confirmed that Dolby Vision works with the Xbox Series X|S with firmware M2B103 and newer.
  7. Updated Jul 18, 2024: Added that the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 can be controlled with a remote and be used like a smart TV with integrated apps.
  8. Updated Jun 13, 2024: Added that the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P doesn't need to use Display Stream Compression to display a 4k image with a 240Hz Refresh Rate.
  9. Updated Jun 05, 2024: Clarified that we didn't experience any issues connecting over HDMI at any Refresh Rate, although this is something that people have reported online.
  10. Updated Jun 03, 2024: Mentioned in the introduction that this monitor competes with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM.
  11. Updated May 01, 2024: Updated to firmware M2B105 and confirmed that eARC now works properly, and it supports 1440p with the PS5.
  12. Updated Apr 19, 2024: Updated this monitor to firmware M2B103, which adds a toggle for Dolby Vision. Also confirmed that it supports up to a 240Hz refresh rate with macOS Sonoma 14.4.1 and newer over HDMI.
  13. Updated Apr 17, 2024: Updated text throughout the review according to Test Bench 2.0, mainly in the Verdict and Motion sections.
  14. Updated Apr 17, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0. This includes new tests for VRR Motion Performance, Refresh Rate Compliance, Cumulative Absolute Deviation (CAD), and VRR Flicker. You can read the full changelog here.
  15. Updated Feb 15, 2024: Clarified that it doesn't have official FreeSync certification. Also clarified that it has a pixel shift feature, but there's no setting for it, and it works automatically.
  16. Updated Feb 09, 2024: Looked into the packaging issue in Build Quality. Updated firmware to M2B102, which fixes Dolby Vision over HDMI on a PC, and gamma in 'Creator' mode. Also confirmed that the max refresh rate is 120Hz even with a M2 MacBook Pro.
  17. Updated Feb 06, 2024: Clarified in HDR Brightness that we couldn't get Dolby Vision to work at all over HDMI.
  18. Updated Feb 06, 2024: Review published.
  19. Updated Feb 01, 2024: Early access published.
  20. Updated Jan 22, 2024: Our testers have started testing this product.
  21. Updated Jan 19, 2024: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
  22. Updated Jan 11, 2024: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Check Price

32"Alienware AW3225QF
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
SEE PRICE
BestBuy.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Amazon.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Amazon.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
SEE PRICE
Walmart.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Walmart.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Walmart.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Walmart.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Walmart.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
BestBuy.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
BestBuy.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
BestBuy.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
BestBuy.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
BestBuy.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
B&H
32"Alienware AW3225QF
B&H
32"Alienware AW3225QF
B&H
32"Alienware AW3225QF
B&H
32"Alienware AW3225QF
B&H
32"Alienware AW3225QF
B&H
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Samsung.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Samsung.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Samsung.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Samsung.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Samsung.com
32"Alienware AW3225QF
Samsung.com

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the 32-inch Dell AW3225QF, which is the only size available for this monitor. Dell's other QD-OLED monitor, the Dell Alienware AW2725DF, is different as it has a 1440p resolution and 360Hz refresh rate. The results are only valid for this model.

ModelSizeResolutionPanel TypeRefresh Rate
AW3225QF32"4kQD-OLED240Hz

Our unit's label indicates it was manufactured in December 2023. While it was originally tested with M2B101, we've retested it with firmware M2B105.

Compared To Other Monitors

The Dell AW3225QF is a premium 4k 32-inch 240Hz curved QD-OLED gaming monitor. It competes in a crowded market with numerous other 32-inch QD-OLED displays, such as the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED, which has a higher bandwidth DisplayPort port, a KVM switch, and delivers over 90W of power over USB-C. The main differentiating factor with the Dell is its curved screen, and it's a fantastic choice if that's the type of screen you're looking for. If you plan to watch a lot of contemporary content, it also has an advantage over most monitors, as it supports Dolby Vision, so content in that format will look better. However, if you prefer a flat screen, there are other displays like the MSI that offer equal performance and a number of additional features.

See our recommendations for the best 4k gaming monitors, the best 240Hz monitors, and the best OLED monitors.

MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED are both 32-inch 4k @ 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The Dell is the better choice if video quality is important to you, as it has Dolby Vision support, and content available in that format will look better. It also has a curved screen, which you may or may not prefer, depending on your preferences. However, the MSI is better for productivity, as it has a KVM switch and delivers up to 90W of power over USB-C.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM are similar 4k, 240Hz QD-OLEDs that use the same panel. The Dell has a curved screen, while the ASUS is flat, so you may find the ASUS a better choice if you don't like curved displays. Other than that, the Dell is the better choice for console gaming as it has lower input lag at 120Hz and 60Hz. However, the ASUS is better for productivity, especially in a bright room, as it gets brighter and has a few more perks, like a KVM switch.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD S32DG80

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 are both 4k @ 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The Samsung is the better choice if you plan to use the monitor as a TV, as it has a remote and integrated apps like Netflix. It's also a better choice if you're in a brighter room, as deep blacks look less purple when a considerable amount of light shines on the screen. However, if video quality is very important to you, then the Dell is the better option, as it supports Dolby Vision, and content available in that format will look better.

LG 32GS95UE-B

The LG 32GS95UE-B and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are 4k, 240Hz OLED gaming monitors. The Dell is the better choice if you're looking for an immersive gaming or video experience, as it has more vivid colors and Dolby Vision support. However, the LG is the better choice if you play esports or other fast-moving competitive games, as it has a 1080p @ 480Hz Dual-Mode that provides an exceptionally responsive feel while gaming.

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

The Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are 32-inch QD-OLED gaming monitors that have a very similar performance. If you prefer a curved display or plan to watch a lot of movies, the Dell is the better choice, as it has a 1700R curve, supports Dolby Vision, and has an eARC port for sending audio to a soundbar or receiver. However, if you plan to use your monitor for editing or productivity work, the Gigabyte is a better option. In addition to having a flat panel, it also has a KVM switch, provides 65W of power delivery over USB-C, and supports DisplayPort Alt mode.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP are both 32-inch 4k OLED gaming monitors. The ASUS is a better option if you plan to use the monitor for office work, as it has a KVM switch, delivers up to 90W of power over USB-C, and has better text clarity. The ASUS is also better if you want the most responsive feel, as it has a 1080p @ 480Hz mode. However, the Dell is better if you want more vivid colors.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM are 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitors. They perform similarly and have many of the same features, including Dolby Vision support, but there are still some differences. For example, the ASUS supports DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth, so you can reach the max refresh rate without using compression with compatible graphics cards. Choosing one over another also depends on the screen type you want, as the Dell has a 32-inch, curved screen, and the ASUS has a 27-inch, flat screen. Although this is a personal preference, the ASUS has sharper text clarity thanks to its higher pixel density.

Dell Alienware AW2725Q

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Dell Alienware AW2725Q are both 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The main difference comes down to their screen shapes as the AW3225QF has a curved, 32-inch screen, which the AW2725Q has a flat, 27-inch display, so choosing one over another comes down to preference. However, the AW2725Q has higher pixel density, resulting in sharper text clarity. Another difference is that the AW3225QF has better accuracy before calibration, which is something to consider if you want a monitor for content creation.

MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED are 32-inch 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitors. Both have very similar performance, and the biggest difference between them is that the Dell has a curved screen, and is a better choice if you prefer this. However, the MSI is a better option if you prefer a flat screen or want a monitor with a KVM switch and at least 90W of power delivery over USB-C.

Dell Alienware AW3423DWF

The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are different types of QD-OLED monitors. The AW3225QF is better for most gamers as it has a higher refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, meaning it's ideal for both high-end PC and console gaming. The AW3225QF also has a higher 4k resolution, resulting in more detailed images and improved text clarity, but the AW3423DWF's ultrawide format has an advantage for atmospheric games. Lastly, the AW3225QF has a few extra features, like an eARC port and support for Dolby Vision. Besides that, the picture quality is similar, even if the AW3225QF uses a newer type of QD-OLED panel.

Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both 4k, 240Hz gaming monitors. They have a few differences, though, particularly with the picture quality, as the Dell has a QD-OLED panel with better blacks and more vivid colors than the Samsung. The Dell doesn't have the same bugs as the Samsung, like with scanlines. On the other hand, the Samsung is the better choice for use in well-lit rooms as it gets bright and doesn't risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.

Dell Alienware AW2725DF

The Dell Alienware AW2725DF and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both flagship QD-OLED gaming monitors from Dell. They both have extremely similar performance, though the AW2725DF has a 27-inch, 360Hz 1440p display, while the AW3225QF has a 32-inch, 240Hz 4k display. The AW2725DF has a higher refresh rate and requires a less powerful graphics card to drive its 1440p resolution while still having exceptional image quality. If you prefer a larger, more immersive experience, as well as something with Dolby Vision support, the AW3225QF is a great choice. It's also a better choice for console gamers due to its 4k display and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. However, it requires a more powerful computer to drive its 4k display at its maximum refresh rate.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SD S27DG602S

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60 are both QD-OLED monitors with a high refresh rate. The Dell is the better choice if you want an immersive experience, as its larger screen and more detailed image creates a more immersive experience. However, if you're a competitive gamer or play a lot of fast-moving games, the Samsung is a better choice, as it has a higher refresh rate and slightly lower input lag, so games feel more responsive.

Dell G3223Q

The Dell G3223Q and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both 4k, 32-inch gaming monitors, but they have a few differences. The AW3225QF is better in most areas as it uses a QD-OLED panel with a better contrast ratio and has brighter highlights and improved overall picture quality. The AW3225QF also has a higher 240Hz refresh rate, making it the better choice for PC gamers. That said, the G3223Q is a bit more versatile if you need something for office work, too, as it gets bright and doesn't risk permanent burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.

Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are different types of QD-OLED monitors. The Dell delivers a more detailed image thanks to its 4k resolution, while the Gigabyte is the better choice for competitive gaming as it has a higher refresh rate. They have features that can benefit different types of users, as the Dolby Vision and eARC support on the Dell is great for watching content, while the KVM switch and DisplayPort Alt Mode on the Gigabyte help for productivity.

ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG are OLED gaming monitors. The Dell is the better choice if you want an immersive experience, as its larger screen and more detailed images create a more immersive experience. However, the ASUS is a better option if you don't have a very powerful gaming PC, as your computer can run games at a higher frame rate on the monitor's native 1440p resolution than the Dell at its native 4k resolution. The ASUS is also a better choice if you're in a room with a fair bit of ambient light, as deep blacks don't appear slightly purple on the ASUS in that setting.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM

The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are large, premium OLED gaming monitors. Both have a 240Hz refresh rate and fantastic gaming and HDR capabilities. However, the Dell has considerably better text clarity, making it better suited to occasional productivity use. However, some may find the ASUS's ultrawide screen more immersive, and it's a better choice if maintaining a high frame rate is important to you, as its lower resolution makes it easier to drive higher frame rates. You may also prefer the ASUS if you're gaming in a brighter environment, as deep blacks won't appear purple in a bright room as they do on the Dell.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM

The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both OLED gaming monitors with a few differences. The Dell delivers better overall picture quality thanks to its QD-OLED panel, which displays more vivid colors and brighter highlights. It also delivers more detail thanks to its 4k resolution. The Dell can also take full advantage of gaming consoles and HDMI 2.1 graphics cards thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. One advantage of the ASUS is that it maintains its perfect black levels even in bright rooms, as black levels rise with ambient light on the Dell.

Cooler Master Tempest GP27U

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Cooler Master Tempest GP27U are both 4k gaming monitors with different characteristics. They use different panel technologies, like the Dell monitor's QD-OLED panel, which displays perfect blacks without any blooming, making it the better choice in dark rooms. However, if you want something for bright rooms, the Cooler Master has an advantage because of its high peak brightness. Besides that, the Dell is superior for gaming thanks to its higher refresh rate and faster response time, but the Cooler Master is better for general work use as it doesn't risk permanent burn-in.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved
Yes
Curve Radius
1700R

The Dell AW3225QF has a slightly curved screen with a gamer-oriented design. The stand and the back housing feature white plastic, while the plastic that covers the panel is black.

8.5
Design
Build Quality

The build quality is excellent. The plastic materials are solid and don't flex easily. The stand is sturdy as it doesn't wobble, and the cable management is easy to use. Overall, it feels great, and there isn't any audible noise coming from a fan. One downside is that the joystick control is loose and creates an audible noise when you use it.

Another downside is that the packaging it comes in can cause some scratches and bubble marks on the screen. You can see an example of this in the top right corner of this picture. This isn't so much an issue with how the monitor is made but rather how it's packaged.

7.2
Design
Ergonomics
Min Height To Top Of Panel
18.2" (46.2 cm)
Height Adjustment
4.2" (10.7 cm)
Tilt Range
-21° to 5°
Rotate Portrait/Landscape
No
Swivel Range
-20° to 20°
Wall Mount
VESA 100x100

The ergonomics are decent. Though its swivel range is somewhat limited you can make any common adjustment for horizontal use. You can also route your cables through the stand for cable management, and there's a cover that goes over the inputs.

Design
Stand
Base Width
16.9" (43.0 cm)
Base Depth
11.6" (29.5 cm)
Thickness (With Display)
10.0" (25.5 cm)
Weight (With Display)
19.4 lbs (8.8 kg)

The V-shaped stand is solid and holds the screen well. The thickness measurement is from the side of the screen to the back of the stand, and the thickness from the center of the screen to the back of the stand is 8.9 inches (22.5 cm).

Design
Display
Size
32"
Housing Width
28.1" (71.4 cm)
Housing Height
16.6" (42.1 cm)
Thickness (Without Stand)
3.6" (9.2 cm)
Weight (Without Stand)
12.9 lbs (5.9 kg)
Borders Size (Bezels)
0.4" (1.0 cm)

The thickness measurement is from the side of the screen to the back, and the thickness from the center of the screen to the back is 2.7 inches (6.9 cm).

Design
Controls

There's a single joystick to control the on-screen display, although it's loose. There's also a power button on the right side. If you're looking for a monitor that you can control with a remote and can be used like a TV with integrated apps, check out the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80.

Design
In The Box
Power Supply
Internal

  • DisplayPort cable
  • HDMI cable
  • USB-B to USB-A cable
  • Power cable
  • Cleaning cloth
  • Documentation
  • Alienware sticker

Picture Quality
10
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
Inf : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
Inf : 1

This monitor has a near-infinite contrast ratio and displays perfect blacks next to bright highlights in a dark room. However, in brighter environments ambient light causes black levels to rise, and deep blacks appear slightly purple.

10
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
No
Backlight
No Backlight

This monitor doesn't have a backlight, so it doesn't require a local dimming feature. However, with a near-infinite contrast ratio, there isn't any blooming around bright objects, and it's the equivalent of a perfect local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can see how the screen performs and compare it with a monitor that has local dimming.

6.7
Picture Quality
SDR Brightness
Real Scene
234 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
245 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
245 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
248 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
250 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
245 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
241 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
244 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
246 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
247 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
244 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.001
Minimum Brightness
26 cd/m²

Settings

  • Preset Mode: Custom Color (after calibration)
  • Brightness: Max

The SDR brightness is okay. While it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare, you can easily see it in a well-lit room. It also maintains its brightness very consistently across different content, which is helpful for tasks such as photo editing.

6.8
Picture Quality
HDR Brightness
VESA DisplayHDR Certification
DisplayHDR TRUE BLACK 400
Real Scene
420 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
976 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
448 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
355 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
300 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
249 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
971 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
446 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
352 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
297 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
247 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.078

Settings

  • Smart HDR: HDR Peak 1000
  • Brightness: 75 (locked)
  • Console Mode: Off

The HDR brightness is okay. While small highlights pop, larger highlights are more muted. The EOTF follows the target curve well, though there's a slow roll-off near peak brightness, so highlights don't get as bright as they could. Enabling Console Mode causes the EOTF to have a sharper roll-off.

The 'HDR Peak 1000' mode is brighter than 'Custom Color HDR,' which has a Real Scene brightness of 356 cd/m², and highlights don't get brighter than 450 cd/m². However, the EOTF has a sharper roll-off in 'Custom Color HDR,' so highlights get brighter.

This monitor supports Dolby Vision on firmware M2B103 or newer.

10
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
70°
Color Washout From Right
70°
Color Shift From Left
70°
Color Shift From Right
70°
Brightness Loss From Left
70°
Brightness Loss From Right
70°
Black Level Raise From Left
70°
Black Level Raise From Right
70°
Gamma Shift From Left
70°
Gamma Shift From Right
70°

The horizontal viewing angle is outstanding. Although it technically isn't perfect, you won't see any inconsistencies when viewing from the sides or if you sit close to the screen.

10
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
70°
Color Washout From Above
70°
Color Shift From Below
70°
Color Shift From Above
70°
Brightness Loss From Below
70°
Brightness Loss From Above
70°
Black Level Raise From Below
70°
Black Level Raise From Above
70°
Gamma Shift From Below
70°
Gamma Shift From Above
70°

The vertical viewing angle is outstanding, and you won't notice any inconsistencies if you're looking down at the monitor while standing.

9.3
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
0.531%
50% DSE
0.100%

The gray uniformity is fantastic. There's no notable dimming at the monitor's edges or dirty screen effect. Like any OLED there are thin gray vertical lines in dark scenes. However, most people won't notice them unless they're looking for them.

10
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
0.162%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
N/A

The black uniformity is outstanding, with a uniform black level across the screen.

9.7
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Creator (sRGB)
sRGB Gamut Area xy
98.8%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
0.76
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,452 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.15
Color dE (Avg.)
0.42
Contrast Setting
75
RGB Settings
Default
Gamma Setting
2.2
Brightness Setting
75
Measured Brightness
167 cd/m²
Brightness Locked
No

The Dell AW3225QF has remarkable accuracy before calibration. The 'Creator' Preset Mode acts as its sRGB mode and locks colors well to the sRGB color space, so they aren't oversaturated. The white balance and most colors have minimal inaccuracies, and even the color temperature is extremely close to the 6500K target. Although it's very slightly overbrightened throughout, gamma follows the target curve well. However, this is only true with M2B102 and later firmware, as gamma is worse on earlier firmware versions.

The 'Creator' mode only locks the RGB settings, so you can still access other settings. Other modes, like 'Custom Color', have worse accuracy.

9.7
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Custom Color
sRGB Gamut Area xy
101.0%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
0.58
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,492 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.18
Color dE (Avg.)
0.48
Contrast Setting
75
RGB Settings
97-98-100
Gamma Setting
No Gamma Setting
Brightness Setting
37
Measured Brightness
100 cd/m²
ICC Profile
Download

The accuracy after calibration is incredible, though it's very similar to before calibration.

9.8
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB Coverage xy
100.0%
sRGB Picture Mode
Custom Color
Adobe RGB Coverage xy
94.6%
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Custom Color

The SDR color gamut is outstanding. It displays the full range of colors in the common sRGB color space and a wide range of colors in Adobe RGB, though green is quite inaccurate.

9.5
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
Yes
DCI-P3 Coverage xy
98.8%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
HDR Peak 1000
Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
78.3%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
HDR Peak 1000

The HDR color gamut is fantastic. It displays a wide range of colors in DCI-P3 and Rec. 2020 and is quite accurate in both spaces.

8.8
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
93.4%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
HDR Peak 1000
10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
45.6%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
HDR Peak 1000

The HDR color volume is excellent. Bright colors look vivid, and dark colors look accurate in a dark room. However, in bright rooms very dark colors lose saturation, and don't look as dark as on WOLED displays.

8.5
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Pixel Type
QD-OLED
Subpixel Layout
Triangular RGB

The Dell AW3225QF has excellent text clarity. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) improves the boldness of letters. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see them in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off. If you want a QD-OLED with sharper text, you can also check out the 27-inch Dell Alienware AW2725Q.

Due to the triangular subpixel layout, there's some color fringing around letters and at the edge of windows. It's hard to see unless you look closely at the monitor. Some people notice this more than others.

9.4
Picture Quality
Reflections
Screen Finish
Glossy
Total Reflections
1.2%
Indirect Reflections
0.7%
Calculated Direct Reflections
0.5%

The reflection handling is incredible. The glossy screen coating reduces glare extremely well while maintaining a clear image. That said, strong ambient light causes black levels to rise, making blacks look somewhat purple.

9.8
Picture Quality
Gradient
Color Depth
10 Bit

The Dell AW3225QF has fantastic gradient handling, and you won't see any banding.

Motion
8.0
Motion
Refresh Rate
Native Refresh Rate
240 Hz
Max Refresh Rate
240 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP
240 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
240 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
240 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
240 Hz

Your graphics card needs to support Display Stream Compression (DSC) to reach the maximum refresh rate over DisplayPort and HDMI. If you're looking for a monitor that doesn't require DSC to reach 4k @ 240Hz, check out the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P, which has DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth with compatible graphics cards.

There have been a few reports of HDMI connection issues, but we didn't experience the same issues with various computers, including those with RTX 3060, 4070, and 4080 graphics cards. That said, your experience may vary.

Motion
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
FreeSync
Compatible (Tested)
G-SYNC
Compatible (NVIDIA Certified)
VRR Maximum
240 Hz
VRR Minimum
< 20 Hz
VRR Supported Connectors
DisplayPort, HDMI

NVIDIA - G-SYNC Compatibility
ConnectionVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz240Hz
HDMI<20Hz240Hz
AMD - FreeSync
ConnectionVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz240Hz
HDMI<20Hz240Hz

The Dell AW3225QF supports all common VRR formats over both DisplayPort and HDMI, including FreeSync, despite not having official certification from AMD. Additionally, G-SYNC over HDMI works properly.

9.7
Motion
VRR Motion Performance
See details on graph tool
Recommended VRR OD Setting
No OD Mode
Variable Overdrive Advertised
No
Avg. CAD
29
Best CAD
17
Worst CAD
38

Frame RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
239HeatmapChartPhoto
165HeatmapChartPhoto
144HeatmapChartPhoto
120HeatmapChartPhoto
100HeatmapChartPhoto
80HeatmapChartPhoto
60HeatmapChartPhoto

The Dell AW3225QF has remarkable motion handling across its VRR range. There's minimal blur or smearing with fast-moving objects, and it remains consistent as the refresh rate drops. Any blur at low refresh rates is persistence blur.

9.5
Motion
Refresh Rate Compliance
See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool
Compliance @ Max Hz
89%
Compliance @ 120 FPS
92%
Compliance @ 60 FPS
95%

The refresh rate compliance is remarkable. It makes full-color transitions before drawing the next frame because of its near-instantaneous response time.

9.9
Motion
CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
od-transition-max-refresh-rate-no-0-31
OD no
0 to 31
Recommended Overdrive Setting
No OD Mode
Avg. CAD
13
Best 10% CAD
7
Worst 10% CAD
23

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
No OverdriveHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at the maximum refresh rate is fantastic. Fast-moving objects look extremely crisp, and there isn't any blur trail or noticeable inverse ghosting.

Motion
Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
No OD Mode
First Response Time
0.4 ms
Total Response Time
0.4 ms
RGB Overshoot
0 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
1.9 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
1.9 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
0 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
No OverdriveHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

9.9
Motion
CAD @ 120Hz
OD Transition 120Hz
od-transition-120-no-0-31
OD no
0 to 31
Recommended Overdrive Setting
No OD Mode
Avg. CAD
13
Best 10% CAD
7
Worst 10% CAD
20

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
No OverdriveHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 120Hz is remarkable. There isn't any noticeable blur trail or inverse ghosting.

Motion
Response Time @ 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
No OD Mode
First Response Time
0.4 ms
Total Response Time
0.4 ms
RGB Overshoot
0 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
1.4 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
1.4 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
0 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
No OverdriveHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

9.9
Motion
CAD @ 60Hz
OD Transition 60Hz
od-transition-60-no-0-31
OD no
0 to 31
Recommended Overdrive Setting
No OD Mode
Avg. CAD
13
Best 10% CAD
6
Worst 10% CAD
20

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
No OverdriveHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 60Hz is outstanding. Pixels transition colors almost instantly, and any lack of crispness is persistence blur.

Motion
Response Time @ 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
No OD Mode
First Response Time
0.4 ms
Total Response Time
0.4 ms
RGB Overshoot
0 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
1.4 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
1.4 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
0 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
No OverdriveHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

Motion
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
No BFI
Maximum Frequency
N/A
Minimum Frequency
N/A
Longest Pulse Width Brightness
N/A
Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
N/A
Pulse Width Control
No BFI
Pulse Phase Control
No BFI
Pulse Amplitude Control
No BFI
VRR At The Same Time
No BFI

This monitor doesn't have an optional black frame insertion feature to reduce persistence blur further.

5.5
Motion
VRR Flicker
Dark Gray Flicker
5.6 RGB
Middle Gray Flicker
0.9 RGB
Light Gray Flicker
1.1 RGB

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF has noticeable VRR flicker in darker parts of scenes. However, flicker is minimal in brighter parts of scenes, and isn't present at all if your PC maintains fairly consistent frame rates.

10
Motion
Image Flicker
Flicker-Free
No
PWM Dimming Frequency
0 Hz

The backlight isn't technically flicker-free because it has a slight dip in brightness that corresponds to the monitor's refresh rate.

Inputs
8.9
Inputs
Input Lag
Native Resolution @ Max Hz
3.1 ms
Native Resolution @ 120Hz
7.3 ms
Native Resolution @ 60Hz
15.0 ms
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
N/A

Settings

  • Console Mode: On

The Dell AW3225QF has low input lag for a responsive feel, even if the input lag at 60Hz and 120Hz is a bit higher than expected. 

We tested input lag over HDMI because Console Mode is only available over HDMI, though we expect input lag over DisplayPort to be the same. The input lag changes depending on which Console Mode setting you use, as you can see below:

Refresh RateConsole Mode: OnConsole Mode: OffConsole Mode: Legacy Devices
Max3.1 ms3.0 msN/A
120Hz7.3 ms8.6 ms6.9 ms
60Hz15.0 ms14.9 ms15.0 ms

8.5
Inputs
Resolution
Native Resolution
3840 x 2160
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Megapixels
8.3 MP
Pixel Density
138 PPI
10
Inputs
PS5 Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
Yes
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

The Dell AW3225QF is fully compatible with the PS5 and PS5 Pro. While you don't need to enable Console Mode for full compatibility, Dell suggests using it for the best experience with consoles. 

As of firmware M2B105 the monitor supports 1440p signals with the PS5.

8.2
Inputs
Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
Yes
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
No
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

The monitor works well with the Xbox Series X|S and supports 4k up to 120Hz thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. While you don't need to enable Console Mode for the best compatibility, Dell suggests using it for the best experience with consoles. It also supports Dolby Vision with the Xbox with firmware M2B103 and newer. 

If you want to connect the monitor to the Xbox at 1440p you need to enable the console's HDMI override setting to get 1440p @ 60Hz, which also disables VRR. Even with a 1440p @ 60Hz signal you can't switch it to 120Hz, and the same issue occurs even with firmware M2B105. 

While the monitor doesn't support HDR at 1080p or 1440p, this is a limitation of the Xbox, not the monitor.

Inputs
Inputs Photos

Most of the inputs are underneath the back right side of the monitor, and there are two USB ports underneath the front left side. The power port is underneath the back left side.

Inputs
Video And Audio Ports
DisplayPort
1 (DP 1.4)
DisplayPort Transmission Bandwidth
No DisplayPort 2.1
Mini DisplayPort
No
HDMI
2 (HDMI 2.1)
HDMI 2.1 Bandwidth
48Gbps (FRL 12x4)
DVI
No
VGA
No
Daisy Chaining
No
3.5mm Audio Out
No
3.5mm Audio In
No
HDR10
Yes
3.5mm Microphone In
No

One of the HDMI ports also serves as an eARC port you can use to connect a soundbar or receiver. It properly works as of firmware M2B105, which was released in April 2024, as there were compatibility issues before the update. If you have issues with its eARC support, try updating the monitor's firmware.

Inputs
USB
USB-A Ports
3
USB-A Rated Speed
5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
USB-B Upstream Port
Yes
USB-C Ports
1
USB-C Upstream
No
USB-C Rated Speed
5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
USB-C Power Delivery
15W
USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
No
Thunderbolt
No

The USB-C port doesn't support DisplayPort Alt Mode or Thunderbolt, so you can only use it to charge devices or connect peripherals, like a keyboard or mouse. If you're looking for a monitor that can deliver up to 90W of power over USB-C and supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, check out the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED.

Inputs
macOS Compatibility

ConnectionHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1USB-C
Max Refresh Rate60Hz240Hz120Hz
VRR RangeN/A48-240Hz48-120Hz
HDRYesYesYes

The Dell AW3225QF works well with macOS. HDR looks good in games, but Dolby Vision doesn't work. Additionally, SDR looks better on the desktop, so it's better to turn HDR off for general work use. If you're using a MacBook, windows go back to their original position after reopening the lid or waking the laptop up from sleep.

Features
Features
Additional Features
Speakers
No
RGB Illumination
Controllable
Multiple Input Display
PIP + PBP
KVM Switch
No

The Dell AW3225QF has a few extra features, including:

  • Alienware Command Center: Application to control the RGB backlighting and other basic functions like power consumption and color profiles. This software is only available on Windows, but you can still change the backlighting colors through the OSD if you have a macOS device. Unfortunately, there's a bug with the RGB lighting. If you change inputs or even power the monitor off and on again, the lights turn on, even if you had them set to off in the Alienware Command Center or in the OSD.
  • AlienVision: Provides different crosshairs and vision modes. Your game's anti-cheat tool won't detect this, giving you a competitive advantage.
  • Dark Stabilizer: Makes dark parts of scenes brighter so you can see your opponents more easily in games.
  • Game Enhance Mode: Provides timer, frame rate counter, and display alignment features.
  • PIP/PBP: Allows you to display images from two inputs at once, and you can customize the location and size of the windows.

As expected for an OLED panel, it has a few settings under OLED Panel Maintenance to help reduce the risk of burn-in. 

  • Pixel Refresh: The monitor runs a pixel refresh cycle after every 4 hours of usage, and it takes 6-8 minutes to complete.
  • Panel Refresh: This is a more complicated process that refreshes the whole panel and takes about an hour to do, but it only runs after 7,000 hours of usage, or you can manually enable it.

There's also a Panel Health indicator that displays a colored dot to show the status for when you need to run a pixel or panel refresh cycle. While there's no setting for pixel shifting, the monitor automatically performs pixel shifting, although it isn't clear how often.

Features
On-Screen Display (OSD)

You can find more information about the monitor in the User's Guide.

Comments

  1. Product

Dell Alienware AW3225QF: Main Discussion

Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.

    Hello, Thank you for your interest in our mouse reviews. While we don’t plan to expand CPI accuracy testing in the near future, I’ve noted your suggestion to test it at various polling rates. We’ll consider it the next time we look into expanding our testing.

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.

    Edited 2 months ago: I have something more to say
  3. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different

    Hey Zopaster, that’s a great observation. While the CPI results are technically different at different polling rate settings, they are incredibly similar and within the range we expect from one run to the next. The data tells us that this mouse has remarkable CPI accuracy and consistency across different polling rates. The differences that we measured are far beneath the perception threshold, so functionally, the polling rate has no impact on CPI accuracy.

  4. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Great question lolypopeater! CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate. Let me know if you have any more questions!

    But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different

  5. We’ve just released a new video that mentions the Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed here.

    Show More Updates
  6. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)

    Great question lolypopeater!

    CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate.

    Let me know if you have any more questions!

  7. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)

  8. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.

    Hello, Thank you for your interest in our mouse reviews. While we don’t plan to expand CPI accuracy testing in the near future, I’ve noted your suggestion to test it at various polling rates. We’ll consider it the next time we look into expanding our testing.

  9. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.

    Edited 2 months ago: I have something more to say
  10. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different

    Hey Zopaster, that’s a great observation. While the CPI results are technically different at different polling rate settings, they are incredibly similar and within the range we expect from one run to the next. The data tells us that this mouse has remarkable CPI accuracy and consistency across different polling rates. The differences that we measured are far beneath the perception threshold, so functionally, the polling rate has no impact on CPI accuracy.

  11. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Great question lolypopeater! CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate. Let me know if you have any more questions!

    But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different

  12. We’ve just released a new video that mentions the Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed here.

    Show More Updates
  13. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)

    Great question lolypopeater!

    CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate.

    Let me know if you have any more questions!

  14. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)