Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Dell Alienware AW3225QF  Monitor Review

Review updated Mar 27, 2025 at 11:56am
Retest Jul 02, 2025 at 10:57am
Tested using Methodology v2.1 
Dell Alienware AW3225QF
9.0
PC Gaming 
9.0
Console Gaming 
7.5
Office 
9.3
Editing 
6.8
Brightness 
9.7
Response Time 
9.4
HDR Picture 
10
SDR Picture 
 406

The Dell AW3225QF is a premium 4k 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor. It competes with a number of other 32-inch QD-OLEDs, such as the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED, the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P, and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD S32DG80, though the Dell is unique among these in having a curved screen. It has features common with 32-inch QD-OLEDs, such as support for all VRR formats and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. However, it also has some less common features, such as Dolby Vision support and an eARC/ARC port to digitally connect a soundbar or receiver.

Our Verdict

9.0
PC Gaming 

The Dell AW3225QF is outstanding for PC gaming. It has a near-instantaneous response time that results in crisp motion, and it has low input lag for a responsive feel. Its deep blacks in dark rooms and perfect black uniformity are also ideal for gaming in light-controlled conditions. It also gets bright enough for highlights to pop, and colors look vivid. While it supports all common VRR formats to reduce screen tearing, there's noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is disappointing if your PC can't maintain consistent frame rates.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks in dark rooms.

  • Perfect black uniformity.
  • 240Hz refresh rate and VRR support.
  • Near-instantaneous response time.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates.
  • Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.

9.0
Console Gaming 

The Dell AW3225QF is remarkable for console gaming. It has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and supports 4k signals up to 120Hz from the PS5, PS5 Pro, and Xbox Series X|S. It delivers outstanding gaming performance thanks to its near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. It also provides outstanding picture quality with deep and inky blacks in dark rooms, as well as bright and vivid colors. However, while it has a low input lag at 120Hz, which Xbox can use across games, it's not as responsive as some other monitors at 60Hz, which is used in some PS5 games.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks in dark rooms.

  • Near-instantaneous response time.
  • HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
  • Low input lag.
Cons
  • Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.

7.5
Office 

The Dell AW3225QF is good for office work but has some limitations. Its large screen makes it easy to multitask, and its high 4k resolution helps produce excellent text clarity. It also has wide viewing angles and decent ergonomics, making it easy to share your screen with someone else. And while it doesn't get extremely bright in SDR, it's still bright enough for use in a moderately-lit room, though it only has adequate reflection handling. Additionally, OLEDs like this one are prone to burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, which you may encounter with productivity programs and taskbars.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Excellent text clarity.
Cons
  • Adequate reflection handling.

  • Risk of burn-in.
  • USB-C doesn't support DisplayPort Alt Mode.
9.3
Editing 

The Dell AW3225QF is fantastic for content creation. It has remarkable accuracy in its sRGB picture mode, so you don't need to calibrate it, and it displays a wide range of vivid colors. The high 4k resolution displays crisp images, but its slightly curved screen may take some time to get used to if you've never used a curved display before. It also has okay SDR brightness, though it doesn't get bright enough to fight bright glare and has just adequate reflection handling. It has some downsides, though, as OLEDs like this are prone to burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.

Pros
  • Wide viewing angles.
  • Excellent text clarity.
  • Deep and inky blacks in dark rooms.

  • Remarkable accuracy before calibration.
Cons
  • Adequate reflection handling.

  • Risk of burn-in.
  • USB-C doesn't support DisplayPort Alt Mode.
  • Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.

6.8
Brightness 

The Dell AW3225QF has okay brightness. It's fine if you have a few lights around, but it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare. Small highlights in HDR also pop against the rest of the image, but larger highlights are dimmer.

Pros
  • Small highlights stand out.
Cons
  • Not bright enough to fight intense glare.

9.7
Response Time 

The Dell AW3225QF has a near-instantaneous response time, resulting in exceptionally sharp motion.

Pros
  • Near-instantaneous response time.
  • Outstanding refresh rate compliance.
Cons
None
9.4
HDR Picture 

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF monitor is outstanding for HDR. It displays a wide range of colors vividly, as well as deep blacks in a dark room. However, blacks appear slightly purple in rooms with a lot of ambient light.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks in dark rooms.

  • Perfect black uniformity.
  • Displays wide range of vivid colors.
Cons
None
10
SDR Picture 

The Dell AW3225QF has outstanding SDR picture quality, as it displays deep and inky blacks in a dark room as well as a wide range of colors.

Pros
  • Deep and inky blacks in dark rooms.

  • Displays wide range of vivid colors.
Cons
None
9.6
Color Accuracy 

The Dell Alienware AW3225QF has exceptional color accuracy. It has remarkable accuracy before calibration, so calibration doesn't improve the accuracy much. It also maintains an accurate image across the screen thanks to its fantastic gray uniformity.

Pros
  • Remarkable accuracy before calibration.
  • Fantastic gray uniformity.
Cons
None
  • 9.0
    PC Gaming
  • 9.0
    Console Gaming
  • 7.5
    Office
  • 9.3
    Editing

  • Performance Usages

  • 6.8
    Brightness
  • 9.7
    Response Time
  • 9.4
    HDR Picture
  • 10
    SDR Picture
  • 9.6
    Color Accuracy
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Jul 02, 2025: 

      We confirmed that you can enable DSR with Console Mode on 'Legacy Devices.' We also retested the Input Lag with firmware M2B107, but it remains the same.

    2.  Updated Jun 13, 2025: 

      We updated text throughout to match the new and updated tests with Test Bench 2.1, including in the Verdict section.

    3.  Updated Jun 13, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.1. This includes new tests for Direct Reflections, Ambient Black Level Raise, and Total Reflected Light. You can see all the changes in the changelog.
    4.  Updated Apr 08, 2025: 

      Added that the Dell Alienware AW2725Q has better text clarity.

    Check Price

    32"Alienware AW3225QF
    SEE PRICE
    BestBuy.com
    32"Alienware AW3225QF
    SEE PRICE
    BestBuy.com
    32"Alienware AW3225QF
    SEE PRICE
    BestBuy.com
    32"Alienware AW3225QF
    SEE PRICE
    BestBuy.com

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the 32-inch Dell AW3225QF, which is the only size available for this monitor. Dell's other QD-OLED monitor, the Dell Alienware AW2725DF, is different as it has a 1440p resolution and 360Hz refresh rate. The results are only valid for this model.

    ModelSizeResolutionPanel TypeRefresh Rate
    AW3225QF32"4kQD-OLED240Hz

    Our unit's label indicates it was manufactured in December 2023. While it was originally tested with M2B101, we've retested it with firmware M2B105.

    Popular Monitor Comparisons

    The Dell AW3225QF is a premium 4k 32-inch 240Hz curved QD-OLED gaming monitor. It competes in a crowded market with numerous other 32-inch QD-OLED displays, such as the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED, which has a higher bandwidth DisplayPort port, a KVM switch, and delivers over 90W of power over USB-C. The main differentiating factor with the Dell is its curved screen, and it's a fantastic choice if that's the type of screen you're looking for. If you plan to watch a lot of contemporary content, it also has an advantage over most monitors, as it supports Dolby Vision, so content in that format will look better. However, if you prefer a flat screen, there are other displays like the MSI that offer equal performance and a number of additional features.

    See our recommendations for the best 4k gaming monitors, the best 240Hz monitors, and the best OLED monitors.

    ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

    The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM are similar 4k, 240Hz QD-OLEDs that use the same panel. The Dell has a curved screen, while the ASUS is flat, so you may find the ASUS a better choice if you don't like curved displays. Other than that, the Dell is the better choice for console gaming as it has lower input lag at 120Hz and 60Hz. However, the ASUS is better for productivity, especially in a bright room, as it gets brighter and has a few more perks, like a KVM switch.

    MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED

    The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED are both 32-inch 4k @ 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The Dell is the better choice if video quality is important to you, as it has Dolby Vision support, and content available in that format will look better. It also has a curved screen, which you may or may not prefer, depending on your preferences. However, the MSI is better for productivity, as it has a KVM switch and delivers up to 90W of power over USB-C.

    Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD S32DG80

    The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD S32DG80 are both 4k @ 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The Samsung monitor is the better choice if you plan to use the monitor as a TV, as it has a remote and integrated apps like Netflix. It's also a better choice if you're in a brighter room, as it has better reflection handling. However, if video quality is very important to you, then the Dell is the better option, as it supports Dolby Vision, and content available in that format will look better.

    LG 32GS95UE-B

    The LG 32GS95UE-B and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are 4k, 240Hz OLED gaming monitors. The Dell is the better choice if you're looking for an immersive gaming or video experience, as it has more vivid colors and Dolby Vision support. However, the LG is the better choice if you play esports or other fast-moving competitive games, as it has a 1080p @ 480Hz Dual-Mode that provides an exceptionally responsive feel while gaming.

    Show more 

    Video

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    Curved
    Yes
    Curve Radius
    1700R

    The Dell AW3225QF has a slightly curved screen with a gamer-oriented design. The stand and the back housing feature white plastic, while the plastic that covers the panel is black.

    8.5
    Build Quality

    The build quality is excellent. The plastic materials are solid and don't flex easily. The stand is sturdy as it doesn't wobble, and the cable management is easy to use. Overall, it feels great, and there isn't any audible noise coming from a fan. One downside is that the joystick control is loose and creates an audible noise when you use it.

    Another downside is that the packaging it comes in can cause some scratches and bubble marks on the screen. You can see an example of this in the top right corner of this picture. This isn't so much an issue with how the monitor is made but rather how it's packaged.

    7.2
    Ergonomics
    Min Height To Top Of Panel
    18.2" (46.2 cm)
    Height Adjustment
    4.2" (10.7 cm)
    Tilt Range
    -21° to 5°
    Rotate Portrait/Landscape
    No
    Swivel Range
    -20° to 20°
    Wall Mount
    VESA 100x100

    The ergonomics are decent. Though its swivel range is somewhat limited you can make any common adjustment for horizontal use. You can also route your cables through the stand for cable management, and there's a cover that goes over the inputs.

    Stand
    Base Width
    16.9" (43.0 cm)
    Base Depth
    11.6" (29.5 cm)
    Thickness (With Display)
    10.0" (25.5 cm)
    Weight (With Display)
    19.4 lbs (8.8 kg)

    The V-shaped stand is solid and holds the screen well. The thickness measurement is from the side of the screen to the back of the stand, and the thickness from the center of the screen to the back of the stand is 8.9 inches (22.5 cm).

    Display
    Size
    32"
    Housing Width
    28.1" (71.4 cm)
    Housing Height
    16.6" (42.1 cm)
    Thickness (Without Stand)
    3.6" (9.2 cm)
    Weight (Without Stand)
    12.9 lbs (5.9 kg)
    Borders Size (Bezels)
    0.4" (1.0 cm)

    The thickness measurement is from the side of the screen to the back, and the thickness from the center of the screen to the back is 2.7 inches (6.9 cm).

    Controls

    There's a single joystick to control the on-screen display, although it's loose. There's also a power button on the right side. If you're looking for a monitor that you can control with a remote and can be used like a TV with integrated apps, check out the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80.

    In The Box
    Power Supply
    Internal

    • DisplayPort cable
    • HDMI cable
    • USB-B to USB-A cable
    • Power cable
    • Cleaning cloth
    • Documentation
    • Alienware sticker

    Picture Quality
    10
    Contrast
    Native Contrast
    Inf : 1
    Contrast With Local Dimming
    Inf : 1

    This monitor has a near-infinite contrast ratio and displays perfect blacks next to bright highlights in a dark room. However, in bright rooms ambient light causes black levels to rise, and deep blacks appear purple.

    10
    Local Dimming
    Local Dimming
    No
    Backlight
    No Backlight

    This monitor doesn't have a backlight, so it doesn't require a local dimming feature. However, with a near-infinite contrast ratio, there isn't any blooming around bright objects, and it's the equivalent of a perfect local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can see how the screen performs and compare it with a monitor that has local dimming.

    6.7
    SDR Brightness
    Real Scene
    234 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    245 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    245 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    248 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    250 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    245 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    241 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    244 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    246 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    247 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    244 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.001
    Minimum Brightness
    26 cd/m²

    Settings

    • Preset Mode: Custom Color (after calibration)
    • Brightness: Max

    The SDR brightness is okay. While it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare, you can easily see it in a well-lit room. It also maintains its brightness very consistently across different content, which is helpful for tasks such as photo editing.

    6.8
    HDR Brightness
    VESA DisplayHDR Certification
    DisplayHDR TRUE BLACK 400
    Real Scene
    420 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    976 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    448 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    355 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    300 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    249 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    971 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    446 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    352 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    297 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    247 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.078

    Settings

    • Smart HDR: HDR Peak 1000
    • Brightness: 75 (locked)
    • Console Mode: Off

    The HDR brightness is okay. While small highlights pop, larger highlights are more muted. The EOTF follows the target curve well, though there's a slow roll-off near peak brightness, so highlights don't get as bright as they could. Enabling Console Mode causes the EOTF to have a sharper roll-off.

    The 'HDR Peak 1000' mode is brighter than 'Custom Color HDR,' which has a Real Scene brightness of 356 cd/m², and highlights don't get brighter than 450 cd/m². However, the EOTF has a sharper roll-off in 'Custom Color HDR,' so highlights get brighter.

    10
    Horizontal Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Left
    70°
    Color Washout From Right
    70°
    Color Shift From Left
    70°
    Color Shift From Right
    70°
    Brightness Loss From Left
    70°
    Brightness Loss From Right
    70°
    Black Level Raise From Left
    70°
    Black Level Raise From Right
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Left
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Right
    70°

    The horizontal viewing angle is outstanding. Although it technically isn't perfect, you won't see any inconsistencies when viewing from the sides or if you sit close to the screen.

    10
    Vertical Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Below
    70°
    Color Washout From Above
    70°
    Color Shift From Below
    70°
    Color Shift From Above
    70°
    Brightness Loss From Below
    70°
    Brightness Loss From Above
    70°
    Black Level Raise From Below
    70°
    Black Level Raise From Above
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Below
    70°
    Gamma Shift From Above
    70°

    The vertical viewing angle is outstanding, and you won't notice any inconsistencies if you're looking down at the monitor while standing.

    9.3
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    0.531%
    50% DSE
    0.100%

    The gray uniformity is fantastic. There's no notable dimming at the monitor's edges or dirty screen effect. Like any OLED there are thin gray vertical lines in dark scenes. However, most people won't notice them unless they're looking for them.

    10
    Black Uniformity
    Native Std. Dev.
    0.162%
    Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
    N/A

    The black uniformity is outstanding, with a uniform black level across the screen.

    9.7
    Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    Creator (sRGB)
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    98.8%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    0.76
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,452 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.15
    Color dE (Avg.)
    0.42
    Contrast Setting
    75
    RGB Settings
    Default
    Gamma Setting
    2.2
    Brightness Setting
    75
    Measured Brightness
    167 cd/m²
    Brightness Locked
    No

    The Dell AW3225QF has remarkable accuracy before calibration. The 'Creator' Preset Mode acts as its sRGB mode and locks colors well to the sRGB color space, so they aren't oversaturated. The white balance and most colors have minimal inaccuracies, and even the color temperature is extremely close to the 6500K target. Although it's very slightly overbrightened throughout, gamma follows the target curve well. However, this is only true with M2B102 and later firmware, as gamma is worse on earlier firmware versions.

    The 'Creator' mode only locks the RGB settings, so you can still access other settings. Other modes, like 'Custom Color', have worse accuracy.

    9.7
    Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    Custom Color
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    101.0%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    0.58
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,492 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.18
    Color dE (Avg.)
    0.48
    Contrast Setting
    75
    RGB Settings
    97-98-100
    Gamma Setting
    No Gamma Setting
    Brightness Setting
    37
    Measured Brightness
    100 cd/m²
    ICC Profile
    Download

    The accuracy after calibration is incredible, though it's very similar to before calibration.

    9.8
    SDR Color Gamut
    sRGB Coverage xy
    100.0%
    sRGB Picture Mode
    Custom Color
    Adobe RGB Coverage xy
    94.6%
    Adobe RGB Picture Mode
    Custom Color

    The SDR color gamut is outstanding. It displays the full range of colors in the common sRGB color space and a wide range of colors in Adobe RGB, though green is quite inaccurate.

    9.5
    HDR Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    Yes
    DCI-P3 Coverage xy
    98.8%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR Peak 1000
    Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
    78.3%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR Peak 1000

    The HDR color gamut is fantastic. It displays a wide range of colors in DCI-P3 and Rec. 2020 and is quite accurate in both spaces.

    8.8
    HDR Color Volume
    1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
    93.4%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    HDR Peak 1000
    10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
    45.6%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    HDR Peak 1000

    The HDR color volume is excellent. Bright colors look vivid, and dark colors look accurate in a dark room. However, in bright rooms very dark colors lose saturation, and don't look as dark as on WOLED displays.

    8.5
    Text Clarity
    Pixel Type
    QD-OLED
    Subpixel Layout
    Triangular RGB

    The Dell AW3225QF has excellent text clarity. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) improves the boldness of letters. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see them in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off. If you want a QD-OLED with sharper text, you can also check out the 27-inch Dell Alienware AW2725Q.

    Due to the triangular subpixel layout, there's some color fringing around letters and at the edge of windows. It's hard to see unless you look closely at the monitor. Some people notice this more than others.

    6.7
    Direct Reflections
    See details on graph tool
    Peak Direct Reflection Intensity
    28.3%
    Screen Finish
    Glossy

    The direct reflection handling is adequate, though bright objects are still somewhat distinct. The panel isn't perfectly even, so some reflections are warped, as you can see in the test image above. However, this is something that you may only notice depending on the positioning of the light source and the content on the screen, and it can also vary between units.

    4.5
    Ambient Black Level Raise
    See details on graph tool
    Black Luminance @ 0 lx
    0.00 cd/m²
    Black Luminance @ 1000 lx
    3.22 cd/m²

    The black levels are disappointing in a bright room. QD-OLEDs like this one lack a polarizer, which is one of the main reasons why blacks look purple in a bright room. This means you need to use it in a dark room to get perfect black levels.

    8.8
    Total Reflected Light
    Total Reflected Light Intensity
    7,953% ⋅ pixel
    Diffraction Artifacts
    No

    This monitor doesn't reflect too much light. It instead makes some objects look warped and stretches them across the screen, which can still be distracting in a really bright room.

    9.8
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    10 Bit

    The Dell AW3225QF has fantastic gradient handling, and you won't see any banding.

    Motion
    8.0
    Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
    240 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
    240 Hz
    DSC Toggle
    No
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    N/A
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    N/A

    Your graphics card needs to support Display Stream Compression (DSC) to reach the maximum refresh rate over DisplayPort and HDMI. If you're looking for a monitor that doesn't require DSC to reach 4k @ 240Hz, check out the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P, which has DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth with compatible graphics cards.

    Although it doesn't have a dedicated DSC toggle, you can set Console Mode to 'Legacy Devices' to limit the refresh rate to 120Hz and enable Dynamic Super Resolution (DSR) in NVIDIA Control Panel. With Console Mode set to 'On' or 'Off,' DSC is active, which doesn't allow you to enable or disable DSR in the Control Panel.

    There have been a few reports of HDMI connection issues, but we didn't experience the same issues with various computers, including those with RTX 3060, 4070, and 4080 graphics cards. That said, your experience may vary.

    Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    FreeSync
    Compatible (Tested)
    G-SYNC
    Compatible (NVIDIA Certified)
    VRR Maximum
    240 Hz
    VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    VRR Supported Connectors
    DisplayPort, HDMI

    NVIDIA - G-SYNC Compatibility
    ConnectionVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz240Hz
    HDMI<20Hz240Hz
    AMD - FreeSync
    ConnectionVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz240Hz
    HDMI<20Hz240Hz

    The Dell AW3225QF supports all common VRR formats over both DisplayPort and HDMI, including FreeSync, despite not having official certification from AMD. Additionally, G-SYNC over HDMI works properly.

    9.7
    VRR Motion Performance
    See details on graph tool
    Recommended VRR OD Setting
    No OD Mode
    Variable Overdrive Advertised
    No
    Avg. CAD
    29
    Best CAD
    17
    Worst CAD
    38

    Frame RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    239HeatmapChartPhoto
    165HeatmapChartPhoto
    144HeatmapChartPhoto
    120HeatmapChartPhoto
    100HeatmapChartPhoto
    80HeatmapChartPhoto
    60HeatmapChartPhoto

    The Dell AW3225QF has remarkable motion handling across its VRR range. There's minimal blur or smearing with fast-moving objects, and it remains consistent as the refresh rate drops. Any blur at low refresh rates is persistence blur.

    9.5
    Refresh Rate Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Compliance @ Max Hz
    89%
    Compliance @ 120 FPS
    92%
    Compliance @ 60 FPS
    95%

    The refresh rate compliance is remarkable. It makes full-color transitions before drawing the next frame because of its near-instantaneous response time.

    9.9
    CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
    od-transition-max-refresh-rate-no-0-31
    OD no
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    No OD Mode
    Avg. CAD
    13
    Best 10% CAD
    7
    Worst 10% CAD
    23

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    No OverdriveHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at the maximum refresh rate is fantastic. Fast-moving objects look extremely crisp, and there isn't any blur trail or noticeable inverse ghosting.

    Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    No OD Mode
    First Response Time
    0.4 ms
    Total Response Time
    0.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    1.9 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    1.9 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    No OverdriveHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    9.9
    CAD @ 120Hz
    OD Transition 120Hz
    od-transition-120-no-0-31
    OD no
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    No OD Mode
    Avg. CAD
    13
    Best 10% CAD
    7
    Worst 10% CAD
    20

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    No OverdriveHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 120Hz is remarkable. There isn't any noticeable blur trail or inverse ghosting.

    Response Time @ 120Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    No OD Mode
    First Response Time
    0.4 ms
    Total Response Time
    0.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    1.4 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    1.4 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    No OverdriveHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    9.9
    CAD @ 60Hz
    OD Transition 60Hz
    od-transition-60-no-0-31
    OD no
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    No OD Mode
    Avg. CAD
    13
    Best 10% CAD
    6
    Worst 10% CAD
    20

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    No OverdriveHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 60Hz is outstanding. Pixels transition colors almost instantly, and any lack of crispness is persistence blur.

    Response Time @ 60Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    No OD Mode
    First Response Time
    0.4 ms
    Total Response Time
    0.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    1.4 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    1.4 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    No OverdriveHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    No BFI
    Maximum Frequency
    N/A
    Minimum Frequency
    N/A
    Longest Pulse Width Brightness
    N/A
    Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
    N/A
    Pulse Width Control
    No BFI
    Pulse Phase Control
    No BFI
    Pulse Amplitude Control
    No BFI
    VRR At The Same Time
    No BFI

    This monitor doesn't have an optional black frame insertion feature to reduce persistence blur further.

    5.5
    VRR Flicker
    Dark Gray Flicker
    5.6 RGB
    Middle Gray Flicker
    0.9 RGB
    Light Gray Flicker
    1.1 RGB

    The Dell Alienware AW3225QF has noticeable VRR flicker in darker parts of scenes. However, flicker is minimal in brighter parts of scenes, and isn't present at all if your PC maintains fairly consistent frame rates.

    10
    Image Flicker
    Flicker-Free
    No
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    0 Hz

    The backlight isn't technically flicker-free because it has a slight dip in brightness that corresponds to the monitor's refresh rate.

    Inputs
    8.9
    Input Lag
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz
    3.1 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz
    7.3 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz
    15.0 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    N/A

    Settings

    • Console Mode: On

    The Dell AW3225QF has low input lag for a responsive feel, even if the input lag at 60Hz and 120Hz is slightly higher than expected. The input lag is the same even with firmware M2B107.

    We tested input lag over HDMI because Console Mode is only available over HDMI, though we expect input lag over DisplayPort to be the same. The input lag changes depending on which Console Mode setting you use, as you can see below:

    Refresh RateConsole Mode: OnConsole Mode: OffConsole Mode: Legacy Devices
    Max3.1 ms3.0 msN/A
    120Hz7.3 ms8.6 ms6.9 ms
    60Hz15.0 ms14.9 ms15.0 ms

    8.5
    Resolution
    Native Resolution
    3840 x 2160
    Aspect Ratio
    16:9
    Megapixels
    8.3 MP
    Pixel Density
    138 PPI
    10
    PS5 Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    Yes
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    The Dell AW3225QF is fully compatible with the PS5 and PS5 Pro. While you don't need to enable Console Mode for full compatibility, Dell suggests using it for the best experience with consoles. 

    As of firmware M2B105 the monitor supports 1440p signals with the PS5.

    8.2
    Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    Yes
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    No
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    The monitor works well with the Xbox Series X|S and supports 4k up to 120Hz thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. While you don't need to enable Console Mode for the best compatibility, Dell suggests using it for the best experience with consoles. It also supports Dolby Vision with the Xbox with firmware M2B103 and newer. 

    If you want to connect the monitor to the Xbox at 1440p you need to enable the console's HDMI override setting to get 1440p @ 60Hz, which also disables VRR. Even with a 1440p @ 60Hz signal you can't switch it to 120Hz, and the same issue occurs even with firmware M2B105. 

    While the monitor doesn't support HDR at 1080p or 1440p, this is a limitation of the Xbox, not the monitor.

    Inputs
    DisplayPort
    1 (DP 1.4)
    DisplayPort Transmission Bandwidth
    No DisplayPort 2.1
    Mini DisplayPort
    No
    HDMI
    2 (HDMI 2.1)
    HDMI 2.1 Bandwidth
    48Gbps (FRL 12x4)
    Daisy Chaining
    No
    3.5mm Audio Out
    No
    Ethernet
    No
    HDR10
    Yes
    Dolby Vision
    Yes

    One of the HDMI ports also serves as an eARC port you can use to connect a soundbar or receiver. It properly works as of firmware M2B105, which was released in April 2024, as there were compatibility issues before the update. If you have issues with its eARC support, try updating the monitor's firmware.

    This monitor supports Dolby Vision on firmware M2B103 or newer.

    USB
    USB-A Ports
    3
    USB-A Rated Speed
    5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
    USB-B Upstream Port
    Yes
    USB-C Ports
    1
    USB-C Upstream
    No
    USB-C Rated Speed
    5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
    USB-C Power Delivery
    15W
    USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
    No
    Thunderbolt
    No

    The USB-C port doesn't support DisplayPort Alt Mode or Thunderbolt, so you can only use it to charge devices or connect peripherals, like a keyboard or mouse. If you're looking for a monitor that can deliver up to 90W of power over USB-C and supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, check out the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED.

    macOS Compatibility

    ConnectionHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1USB-C
    Max Refresh Rate60Hz240Hz120Hz
    VRR RangeN/A48-240Hz48-120Hz
    HDRYesYesYes

    The Dell AW3225QF works well with macOS. HDR looks good in games, but Dolby Vision doesn't work. Additionally, SDR looks better on the desktop, so it's better to turn HDR off for general work use. If you're using a MacBook, windows go back to their original position after reopening the lid or waking the laptop up from sleep.

    Features
    Additional Features
    Speakers
    No
    RGB Illumination
    Controllable
    Multiple Input Display
    PIP + PBP
    KVM Switch
    No
    Smart OS
    No

    The Dell AW3225QF has a few extra features, including:

    • Alienware Command Center: Application to control the RGB backlighting and other basic functions like power consumption and color profiles. This software is only available on Windows, but you can still change the backlighting colors through the OSD if you have a macOS device. Unfortunately, there's a bug with the RGB lighting. If you change inputs or even power the monitor off and on again, the lights turn on, even if you had them set to off in the Alienware Command Center or in the OSD.
    • AlienVision: Provides different crosshairs and vision modes. Your game's anti-cheat tool won't detect this, giving you a competitive advantage.
    • Dark Stabilizer: Makes dark parts of scenes brighter so you can see your opponents more easily in games.
    • Game Enhance Mode: Provides timer, frame rate counter, and display alignment features.
    • PIP/PBP: Allows you to display images from two inputs at once, and you can customize the location and size of the windows.

    As expected for an OLED panel, it has a few settings under OLED Panel Maintenance to help reduce the risk of burn-in. 

    • Pixel Refresh: The monitor runs a pixel refresh cycle after every 4 hours of usage, and it takes 6-8 minutes to complete.
    • Panel Refresh: This is a more complicated process that refreshes the whole panel and takes about an hour to do, but it only runs after 7,000 hours of usage, or you can manually enable it.

    There's also a Panel Health indicator that displays a colored dot to show the status for when you need to run a pixel or panel refresh cycle. While there's no setting for pixel shifting, the monitor automatically performs pixel shifting, although it isn't clear how often.

    On-Screen Display (OSD)

    You can find more information about the monitor in the User's Guide.

    Comments

    1. Product

    Dell Alienware AW3225QF: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I’m comparing these models — they’re almost the same. But one thing that’s important to me is screen reflection, since my room is quite bright. My friend has the QM7 and it’s like a mirror, which gets really annoying while watching. I’m not sure if the U7N is better in that regard, but based on this content, it seems to handle reflections better.

    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I was looking at this comparison 3 days ago and you all said the Hisense U7 was the better tv. Now you are saying the TCL QM7 is the better tv. Is this correct?

      Yes, the QM7 is a bit better. Even before the Methodology change, but they kept recommending the U7N. Maybe because of having a better reflection handling 🤷‍♂️

    3. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I was looking at this comparison 3 days ago and you all said the Hisense U7 was the better tv. Now you are saying the TCL QM7 is the better tv. Is this correct?

    4. I recently purchased a 75" U7N due to slightly higher ratings than the QM751. However, I have some buyers remorse as I see that the QM7 is recommended for 75" since the 75-inch U7N uses an ADS Pro panel instead of a VA panel, it doesn’t provide the same picture quality as the other sizes. I am wondering whether to return the U7N and get the QM751 or get a 65" U7N. We sit about 12 feet from the TV and watch only streaming (YouTube TV, Hulu, and Netflix). I watch a lot of sports and we also watch dramas and documentaries. We only watch movies occasionally. The viewing angle is pretty much straight on in this room. Any advice on whether to stay with the 75" U7N, go with the QM751 or go down to the 65" U7N would be appreciated. Other options in this price range are also appreciated.

      Hello! Help with personalized buying advice is something our experts offer only via our insider forums. We do have lots of self-service tools and recommendation articles that should be helpful as well though!

    5. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I recently purchased a 75" U7N due to slightly higher ratings than the QM751. However, I have some buyers remorse as I see that the QM7 is recommended for 75" since the 75-inch U7N uses an ADS Pro panel instead of a VA panel, it doesn’t provide the same picture quality as the other sizes. I am wondering whether to return the U7N and get the QM751 or get a 65" U7N.

      We sit about 12 feet from the TV and watch only streaming (YouTube TV, Hulu, and Netflix). I watch a lot of sports and we also watch dramas and documentaries. We only watch movies occasionally. The viewing angle is pretty much straight on in this room. Any advice on whether to stay with the 75" U7N, go with the QM751 or go down to the 65" U7N would be appreciated. Other options in this price range are also appreciated.

    6. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      I just compared the Qm7 vs U7’N step by step and the qm7 is rated higher or equal to every single category in the list yet for some reason, Rtings lists the U7N as the better buy in ALL of their review videos on YouTube. Why?!! Even if the Qm7 is $100-$200 more, it’s still the better tv. (According to Rtings specs).

      It’s important to keep in mind that our scores are based on a weighted average, so two displays can score similar overall but perform very differently in different ways. In this case, you’re right, in many different aspects the TCL is better. The Hisense has significantly better reflection handling and better accuracy out-of-the-box, two things which we feel more people care about. The other scores that go in TCL’s favor are honestly very close, and even if the TCL is slightly better in some ways, the difference isn’t very noticeable. The anti-reflective coating on the U7N, though, is very noticeable. Again, it’s a weighted average, so the weights we’ve assigned might not match your specific needs and usage.

    7. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      I just compared the Qm7 vs U7’N step by step and the qm7 is rated higher or equal to every single category in the list yet for some reason, Rtings lists the U7N as the better buy in ALL of their review videos on YouTube. Why?!! Even if the Qm7 is $100-$200 more, it’s still the better tv. (According to Rtings specs).