The Dell AW3225QF is a premium 4k 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor. It competes with a number of other 32-inch QD-OLEDs, such as the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED, the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P, and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD S32DG80, though the Dell is unique among these in having a curved screen. It has features common with 32-inch QD-OLEDs, such as support for all VRR formats and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. However, it also has some less common features, such as Dolby Vision support and an eARC/ARC port to digitally connect a soundbar or receiver.
The Dell AW3225QF is outstanding for PC gaming. It has a near-instantaneous response time that results in crisp motion, and it has low input lag for a responsive feel. Its near-infinite contrast ratio and perfect black uniformity are also ideal for dark room gaming, and blacks look deep and inky. It also gets bright enough for highlights to pop, and colors look vivid. While it supports all common VRR formats to reduce screen tearing, there's noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is disappointing if your PC can't maintain consistent frame rates.
Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.
The Dell AW3225QF is remarkable for console gaming. It has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and supports 4k signals up to 120Hz from the PS5, PS5 Pro, and Xbox Series X|S. It delivers outstanding gaming performance thanks to its near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion. It also provides outstanding picture quality with deep and inky blacks, as well as bright and vivid colors. However, while it has a low input lag at 120Hz, which Xbox can use across games, it's not as responsive as some other monitors at 60Hz, which is used in some PS5 games.
Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.
The Dell AW3225QF is great for office work but has some limitations. Its large screen makes it easy to multitask, and its high 4k resolution helps produce excellent text clarity. It also has wide viewing angles and decent ergonomics, making it easy to share your screen with someone else. And while it doesn't get extremely bright in SDR, it's still bright enough for use in a moderately-lit room and has incredible reflection handling. That said, OLEDs like this one are prone to burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, which you may encounter with productivity programs and taskbars.
The Dell AW3225QF is fantastic for content creation. It has remarkable accuracy in its sRGB picture mode, so you don't need to calibrate it, and it displays a wide range of vivid colors. Its high 4k resolution displays crisp images, but its slightly curved screen may take some time to get used to if you've never used a curved display before. It also has okay SDR brightness, and while it doesn't get bright enough to fight bright glare, it's still fine with a few lights around and has incredible reflection handling. It has some downsides, though, as OLEDs like this are prone to burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.
Lots of ambient light causes deep blacks to look slightly purple.
The Dell AW3225QF has okay brightness. It's fine if you have a few lights around, but it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare. Small highlights in HDR also pop against the rest of the image, but larger highlights are dimmer.
Not bright enough to fight intense glare.
The Dell AW3225QF has a near-instantaneous response time, resulting in exceptionally sharp motion.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF monitor is outstanding for HDR. It displays a wide range of colors vividly, as well as deep blacks in a dark room. However, blacks appear slightly purple in rooms with a lot of ambient light.
The Dell AW3225QF has outstanding SDR picture quality, as it displays deep and inky blacks as well as a wide range of colors.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF has exceptional color accuracy. It has remarkable accuracy before calibration, so calibration doesn't improve the accuracy much. It also maintains an accurate image across the screen thanks to its fantastic gray uniformity.
Added that the Dell Alienware AW2725Q has better text clarity.
The text in the review has been significantly updated to reflect changes in the market since it was first written.
We retested the input lag with Console Mode on and off with firmware M2B105 to see how the mode affects the input lag at different refresh rates.
We tested the 32-inch Dell AW3225QF, which is the only size available for this monitor. Dell's other QD-OLED monitor, the Dell Alienware AW2725DF, is different as it has a 1440p resolution and 360Hz refresh rate. The results are only valid for this model.
Model | Size | Resolution | Panel Type | Refresh Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|
AW3225QF | 32" | 4k | QD-OLED | 240Hz |
Our unit's label indicates it was manufactured in December 2023. While it was originally tested with M2B101, we've retested it with firmware M2B105.
The Dell AW3225QF is a premium 4k 32-inch 240Hz curved QD-OLED gaming monitor. It competes in a crowded market with numerous other 32-inch QD-OLED displays, such as the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED, which has a higher bandwidth DisplayPort port, a KVM switch, and delivers over 90W of power over USB-C. The main differentiating factor with the Dell is its curved screen, and it's a fantastic choice if that's the type of screen you're looking for. If you plan to watch a lot of contemporary content, it also has an advantage over most monitors, as it supports Dolby Vision, so content in that format will look better. However, if you prefer a flat screen, there are other displays like the MSI that offer equal performance and a number of additional features.
See our recommendations for the best 4k gaming monitors, the best 240Hz monitors, and the best OLED monitors.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED are both 32-inch 4k @ 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The Dell is the better choice if video quality is important to you, as it has Dolby Vision support, and content available in that format will look better. It also has a curved screen, which you may or may not prefer, depending on your preferences. However, the MSI is better for productivity, as it has a KVM switch and delivers up to 90W of power over USB-C.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM are similar 4k, 240Hz QD-OLEDs that use the same panel. The Dell has a curved screen, while the ASUS is flat, so you may find the ASUS a better choice if you don't like curved displays. Other than that, the Dell is the better choice for console gaming as it has lower input lag at 120Hz and 60Hz. However, the ASUS is better for productivity, especially in a bright room, as it gets brighter and has a few more perks, like a KVM switch.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 are both 4k @ 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The Samsung is the better choice if you plan to use the monitor as a TV, as it has a remote and integrated apps like Netflix. It's also a better choice if you're in a brighter room, as deep blacks look less purple when a considerable amount of light shines on the screen. However, if video quality is very important to you, then the Dell is the better option, as it supports Dolby Vision, and content available in that format will look better.
The LG 32GS95UE-B and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are 4k, 240Hz OLED gaming monitors. The Dell is the better choice if you're looking for an immersive gaming or video experience, as it has more vivid colors and Dolby Vision support. However, the LG is the better choice if you play esports or other fast-moving competitive games, as it has a 1080p @ 480Hz Dual-Mode that provides an exceptionally responsive feel while gaming.
The Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are 32-inch QD-OLED gaming monitors that have a very similar performance. If you prefer a curved display or plan to watch a lot of movies, the Dell is the better choice, as it has a 1700R curve, supports Dolby Vision, and has an eARC port for sending audio to a soundbar or receiver. However, if you plan to use your monitor for editing or productivity work, the Gigabyte is a better option. In addition to having a flat panel, it also has a KVM switch, provides 65W of power delivery over USB-C, and supports DisplayPort Alt mode.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP are both 32-inch 4k OLED gaming monitors. The ASUS is a better option if you plan to use the monitor for office work, as it has a KVM switch, delivers up to 90W of power over USB-C, and has better text clarity. The ASUS is also better if you want the most responsive feel, as it has a 1080p @ 480Hz mode. However, the Dell is better if you want more vivid colors.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM are 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitors. They perform similarly and have many of the same features, including Dolby Vision support, but there are still some differences. For example, the ASUS supports DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth, so you can reach the max refresh rate without using compression with compatible graphics cards. Choosing one over another also depends on the screen type you want, as the Dell has a 32-inch, curved screen, and the ASUS has a 27-inch, flat screen. Although this is a personal preference, the ASUS has sharper text clarity thanks to its higher pixel density.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Dell Alienware AW2725Q are both 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED monitors. The main difference comes down to their screen shapes as the AW3225QF has a curved, 32-inch screen, which the AW2725Q has a flat, 27-inch display, so choosing one over another comes down to preference. However, the AW2725Q has higher pixel density, resulting in sharper text clarity. Another difference is that the AW3225QF has better accuracy before calibration, which is something to consider if you want a monitor for content creation.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED are 32-inch 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitors. Both have very similar performance, and the biggest difference between them is that the Dell has a curved screen, and is a better choice if you prefer this. However, the MSI is a better option if you prefer a flat screen or want a monitor with a KVM switch and at least 90W of power delivery over USB-C.
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are different types of QD-OLED monitors. The AW3225QF is better for most gamers as it has a higher refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, meaning it's ideal for both high-end PC and console gaming. The AW3225QF also has a higher 4k resolution, resulting in more detailed images and improved text clarity, but the AW3423DWF's ultrawide format has an advantage for atmospheric games. Lastly, the AW3225QF has a few extra features, like an eARC port and support for Dolby Vision. Besides that, the picture quality is similar, even if the AW3225QF uses a newer type of QD-OLED panel.
The Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both 4k, 240Hz gaming monitors. They have a few differences, though, particularly with the picture quality, as the Dell has a QD-OLED panel with better blacks and more vivid colors than the Samsung. The Dell doesn't have the same bugs as the Samsung, like with scanlines. On the other hand, the Samsung is the better choice for use in well-lit rooms as it gets bright and doesn't risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both flagship QD-OLED gaming monitors from Dell. They both have extremely similar performance, though the AW2725DF has a 27-inch, 360Hz 1440p display, while the AW3225QF has a 32-inch, 240Hz 4k display. The AW2725DF has a higher refresh rate and requires a less powerful graphics card to drive its 1440p resolution while still having exceptional image quality. If you prefer a larger, more immersive experience, as well as something with Dolby Vision support, the AW3225QF is a great choice. It's also a better choice for console gamers due to its 4k display and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. However, it requires a more powerful computer to drive its 4k display at its maximum refresh rate.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60 are both QD-OLED monitors with a high refresh rate. The Dell is the better choice if you want an immersive experience, as its larger screen and more detailed image creates a more immersive experience. However, if you're a competitive gamer or play a lot of fast-moving games, the Samsung is a better choice, as it has a higher refresh rate and slightly lower input lag, so games feel more responsive.
The Dell G3223Q and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both 4k, 32-inch gaming monitors, but they have a few differences. The AW3225QF is better in most areas as it uses a QD-OLED panel with a better contrast ratio and has brighter highlights and improved overall picture quality. The AW3225QF also has a higher 240Hz refresh rate, making it the better choice for PC gamers. That said, the G3223Q is a bit more versatile if you need something for office work, too, as it gets bright and doesn't risk permanent burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are different types of QD-OLED monitors. The Dell delivers a more detailed image thanks to its 4k resolution, while the Gigabyte is the better choice for competitive gaming as it has a higher refresh rate. They have features that can benefit different types of users, as the Dolby Vision and eARC support on the Dell is great for watching content, while the KVM switch and DisplayPort Alt Mode on the Gigabyte help for productivity.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG are OLED gaming monitors. The Dell is the better choice if you want an immersive experience, as its larger screen and more detailed images create a more immersive experience. However, the ASUS is a better option if you don't have a very powerful gaming PC, as your computer can run games at a higher frame rate on the monitor's native 1440p resolution than the Dell at its native 4k resolution. The ASUS is also a better choice if you're in a room with a fair bit of ambient light, as deep blacks don't appear slightly purple on the ASUS in that setting.
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDM and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are large, premium OLED gaming monitors. Both have a 240Hz refresh rate and fantastic gaming and HDR capabilities. However, the Dell has considerably better text clarity, making it better suited to occasional productivity use. However, some may find the ASUS's ultrawide screen more immersive, and it's a better choice if maintaining a high frame rate is important to you, as its lower resolution makes it easier to drive higher frame rates. You may also prefer the ASUS if you're gaming in a brighter environment, as deep blacks won't appear purple in a bright room as they do on the Dell.
The ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM and the Dell Alienware AW3225QF are both OLED gaming monitors with a few differences. The Dell delivers better overall picture quality thanks to its QD-OLED panel, which displays more vivid colors and brighter highlights. It also delivers more detail thanks to its 4k resolution. The Dell can also take full advantage of gaming consoles and HDMI 2.1 graphics cards thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. One advantage of the ASUS is that it maintains its perfect black levels even in bright rooms, as black levels rise with ambient light on the Dell.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Cooler Master Tempest GP27U are both 4k gaming monitors with different characteristics. They use different panel technologies, like the Dell monitor's QD-OLED panel, which displays perfect blacks without any blooming, making it the better choice in dark rooms. However, if you want something for bright rooms, the Cooler Master has an advantage because of its high peak brightness. Besides that, the Dell is superior for gaming thanks to its higher refresh rate and faster response time, but the Cooler Master is better for general work use as it doesn't risk permanent burn-in.
The build quality is excellent. The plastic materials are solid and don't flex easily. The stand is sturdy as it doesn't wobble, and the cable management is easy to use. Overall, it feels great, and there isn't any audible noise coming from a fan. One downside is that the joystick control is loose and creates an audible noise when you use it.
Another downside is that the packaging it comes in can cause some scratches and bubble marks on the screen. You can see an example of this in the top right corner of this picture. This isn't so much an issue with how the monitor is made but rather how it's packaged.
The ergonomics are decent. Though its swivel range is somewhat limited you can make any common adjustment for horizontal use. You can also route your cables through the stand for cable management, and there's a cover that goes over the inputs.
The V-shaped stand is solid and holds the screen well. The thickness measurement is from the side of the screen to the back of the stand, and the thickness from the center of the screen to the back of the stand is 8.9 inches (22.5 cm).
The thickness measurement is from the side of the screen to the back, and the thickness from the center of the screen to the back is 2.7 inches (6.9 cm).
There's a single joystick to control the on-screen display, although it's loose. There's also a power button on the right side. If you're looking for a monitor that you can control with a remote and can be used like a TV with integrated apps, check out the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80.
This monitor doesn't have a backlight, so it doesn't require a local dimming feature. However, with a near-infinite contrast ratio, there isn't any blooming around bright objects, and it's the equivalent of a perfect local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can see how the screen performs and compare it with a monitor that has local dimming.
Settings
The SDR brightness is okay. While it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare, you can easily see it in a well-lit room. It also maintains its brightness very consistently across different content, which is helpful for tasks such as photo editing.
Settings
The HDR brightness is okay. While small highlights pop, larger highlights are more muted. The EOTF follows the target curve well, though there's a slow roll-off near peak brightness, so highlights don't get as bright as they could. Enabling Console Mode causes the EOTF to have a sharper roll-off.
The 'HDR Peak 1000' mode is brighter than 'Custom Color HDR,' which has a Real Scene brightness of 356 cd/m², and highlights don't get brighter than 450 cd/m². However, the EOTF has a sharper roll-off in 'Custom Color HDR,' so highlights get brighter.
This monitor supports Dolby Vision on firmware M2B103 or newer.
The horizontal viewing angle is outstanding. Although it technically isn't perfect, you won't see any inconsistencies when viewing from the sides or if you sit close to the screen.
The vertical viewing angle is outstanding, and you won't notice any inconsistencies if you're looking down at the monitor while standing.
The Dell AW3225QF has remarkable accuracy before calibration. The 'Creator' Preset Mode acts as its sRGB mode and locks colors well to the sRGB color space, so they aren't oversaturated. The white balance and most colors have minimal inaccuracies, and even the color temperature is extremely close to the 6500K target. Although it's very slightly overbrightened throughout, gamma follows the target curve well. However, this is only true with M2B102 and later firmware, as gamma is worse on earlier firmware versions.
The 'Creator' mode only locks the RGB settings, so you can still access other settings. Other modes, like 'Custom Color', have worse accuracy.
The accuracy after calibration is incredible, though it's very similar to before calibration.
The HDR color volume is excellent. Bright colors look vivid, and dark colors look accurate in a dark room. However, in bright rooms very dark colors lose saturation, and don't look as dark as on WOLED displays.
The Dell AW3225QF has excellent text clarity. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) improves the boldness of letters. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see them in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off. If you want a QD-OLED with sharper text, you can also check out the 27-inch Dell Alienware AW2725Q.
Due to the triangular subpixel layout, there's some color fringing around letters and at the edge of windows. It's hard to see unless you look closely at the monitor. Some people notice this more than others.
The reflection handling is incredible. The glossy screen coating reduces glare extremely well while maintaining a clear image. That said, strong ambient light causes black levels to rise, making blacks look somewhat purple.
Your graphics card needs to support Display Stream Compression (DSC) to reach the maximum refresh rate over DisplayPort and HDMI. If you're looking for a monitor that doesn't require DSC to reach 4k @ 240Hz, check out the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P, which has DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth with compatible graphics cards.
There have been a few reports of HDMI connection issues, but we didn't experience the same issues with various computers, including those with RTX 3060, 4070, and 4080 graphics cards. That said, your experience may vary.
NVIDIA - G-SYNC Compatibility | ||
---|---|---|
Connection | VRR Min | VRR Max |
DisplayPort | <20Hz | 240Hz |
HDMI | <20Hz | 240Hz |
AMD - FreeSync | ||
---|---|---|
Connection | VRR Min | VRR Max |
DisplayPort | <20Hz | 240Hz |
HDMI | <20Hz | 240Hz |
The Dell AW3225QF supports all common VRR formats over both DisplayPort and HDMI, including FreeSync, despite not having official certification from AMD. Additionally, G-SYNC over HDMI works properly.
Frame Rate | CAD Heatmap | RT Chart | Pursuit Photo |
---|---|---|---|
239 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
165 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
144 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
120 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
100 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
80 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
60 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
The Dell AW3225QF has remarkable motion handling across its VRR range. There's minimal blur or smearing with fast-moving objects, and it remains consistent as the refresh rate drops. Any blur at low refresh rates is persistence blur.
The refresh rate compliance is remarkable. It makes full-color transitions before drawing the next frame because of its near-instantaneous response time.
This monitor doesn't have an optional black frame insertion feature to reduce persistence blur further.
Settings
The Dell AW3225QF has low input lag for a responsive feel, even if the input lag at 60Hz and 120Hz is a bit higher than expected.
We tested input lag over HDMI because Console Mode is only available over HDMI, though we expect input lag over DisplayPort to be the same. The input lag changes depending on which Console Mode setting you use, as you can see below:
Refresh Rate | Console Mode: On | Console Mode: Off | Console Mode: Legacy Devices |
---|---|---|---|
Max | 3.1 ms | 3.0 ms | N/A |
120Hz | 7.3 ms | 8.6 ms | 6.9 ms |
60Hz | 15.0 ms | 14.9 ms | 15.0 ms |
The Dell AW3225QF is fully compatible with the PS5 and PS5 Pro. While you don't need to enable Console Mode for full compatibility, Dell suggests using it for the best experience with consoles.
As of firmware M2B105 the monitor supports 1440p signals with the PS5.
The monitor works well with the Xbox Series X|S and supports 4k up to 120Hz thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. While you don't need to enable Console Mode for the best compatibility, Dell suggests using it for the best experience with consoles. It also supports Dolby Vision with the Xbox with firmware M2B103 and newer.
If you want to connect the monitor to the Xbox at 1440p you need to enable the console's HDMI override setting to get 1440p @ 60Hz, which also disables VRR. Even with a 1440p @ 60Hz signal you can't switch it to 120Hz, and the same issue occurs even with firmware M2B105.
While the monitor doesn't support HDR at 1080p or 1440p, this is a limitation of the Xbox, not the monitor.
Most of the inputs are underneath the back right side of the monitor, and there are two USB ports underneath the front left side. The power port is underneath the back left side.
One of the HDMI ports also serves as an eARC port you can use to connect a soundbar or receiver. It properly works as of firmware M2B105, which was released in April 2024, as there were compatibility issues before the update. If you have issues with its eARC support, try updating the monitor's firmware.
The USB-C port doesn't support DisplayPort Alt Mode or Thunderbolt, so you can only use it to charge devices or connect peripherals, like a keyboard or mouse. If you're looking for a monitor that can deliver up to 90W of power over USB-C and supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, check out the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED.
Connection | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.1 | USB-C |
---|---|---|---|
Max Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 240Hz | 120Hz |
VRR Range | N/A | 48-240Hz | 48-120Hz |
HDR | Yes | Yes | Yes |
The Dell AW3225QF works well with macOS. HDR looks good in games, but Dolby Vision doesn't work. Additionally, SDR looks better on the desktop, so it's better to turn HDR off for general work use. If you're using a MacBook, windows go back to their original position after reopening the lid or waking the laptop up from sleep.
The Dell AW3225QF has a few extra features, including:
As expected for an OLED panel, it has a few settings under OLED Panel Maintenance to help reduce the risk of burn-in.
There's also a Panel Health indicator that displays a colored dot to show the status for when you need to run a pixel or panel refresh cycle. While there's no setting for pixel shifting, the monitor automatically performs pixel shifting, although it isn't clear how often.
You can find more information about the monitor in the User's Guide.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.
Hello, Thank you for your interest in our mouse reviews. While we don’t plan to expand CPI accuracy testing in the near future, I’ve noted your suggestion to test it at various polling rates. We’ll consider it the next time we look into expanding our testing.
You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.
But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different
Hey Zopaster, that’s a great observation. While the CPI results are technically different at different polling rate settings, they are incredibly similar and within the range we expect from one run to the next. The data tells us that this mouse has remarkable CPI accuracy and consistency across different polling rates. The differences that we measured are far beneath the perception threshold, so functionally, the polling rate has no impact on CPI accuracy.
Great question lolypopeater! CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate. Let me know if you have any more questions!
But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different
We’ve just released a new video that mentions the Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed here.
So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)
Great question lolypopeater!
CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate.
Let me know if you have any more questions!
So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)
You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.
Hello, Thank you for your interest in our mouse reviews. While we don’t plan to expand CPI accuracy testing in the near future, I’ve noted your suggestion to test it at various polling rates. We’ll consider it the next time we look into expanding our testing.
You have to try it at a games like tac shooter (val and cs2) and I getting hard days using scyrox v8 bcz the 0.004% error on its’ 1600 dpi. i’m using 1600 dpi with 0.2 in game sens, I found that the cpi turned into 0.1998 and it’s so hard to use but when u changed it to 2000 hz polling rate u can feel the difference bcz the cpi getting lowered to 1598.36 and my sens turned to 0.19959 ~ 0.1996 and it’s a lot better. At razer deathadder essential I have to find the sens that get 0% cpi error. And at lamzu maya x it’s so easy to shoot and get’s a 1 tap bcz it has 0% error on 800 dpi. The conclusion is me begging u guys to check the cpi accuracy at least at 2 cpi (8k and 4k if it supports 8k) and (4k and 2k if it only supports 4k). Tbh I very grateful that u guys review a lot of mouse and include almost every detailed aspect of it including cpi, the cpi test must be really helpfull for a lot of gamers, thankyou Rtings team.
But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different
Hey Zopaster, that’s a great observation. While the CPI results are technically different at different polling rate settings, they are incredibly similar and within the range we expect from one run to the next. The data tells us that this mouse has remarkable CPI accuracy and consistency across different polling rates. The differences that we measured are far beneath the perception threshold, so functionally, the polling rate has no impact on CPI accuracy.
Great question lolypopeater! CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate. Let me know if you have any more questions!
But the results above shows that in different polling rate the cpi accuracy is also different
We’ve just released a new video that mentions the Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed here.
So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)
Great question lolypopeater!
CPI accuracy is polling rate agnostic. The polling rate determines how often CPI data is sent to your PC, but the CPI data remains the same regardless of polling rate.
Let me know if you have any more questions!
So we can assume that almost every mice out there has a different cpi accuracy on ever polling rate(?)