The gaming monitor market is continuously growing with plenty of options you can choose from. When looking for a new gaming monitor, there are different factors you'll have to consider, like the refresh rate and resolution. There's no perfect solution for everyone, and you have to consider the types of games you play. For example, competitive PC gamers may prefer higher refresh rates and lower resolutions, or you may want an HDMI 2.1 monitor with a 4k resolution for more detailed games. There are even high-resolution, high-refresh-rate displays available, but you need a premium gaming setup to take full advantage of them.
We put each monitor through extensive testing that includes thousands of measurements to help you make a buying decision. No matter what type of gamer you are, getting a monitor with a fast response time for great motion handling is beneficial. Low input lag is also important, but that's the case with most monitors. Having VRR support helps reduce screen tearing, and most monitors support common VRR formats. Lastly, premium monitors combine fantastic gaming performance with incredible picture quality, so they offer the best of both worlds, but they also cost a lot.
We've bought and tested over 340 monitors and below, you'll find our recommendations for the best gaming monitors available. See our picks for the best 4k gaming monitors, the best 240Hz monitors, and the best monitor brands. If you want to complete your gaming setup, also check out the best gaming mouse, the best gaming keyboards, and the best gaming headsets.
The best gaming monitor we've tested is the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED. It's a premium 4k, 240Hz monitor with a QD-OLED panel. It provides both outstanding picture quality and fantastic gaming performance. Motion looks extremely clear thanks to its near-instantaneous response time, so there's almost no blur behind fast-moving objects. It also supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards and gaming consoles and has some neat features, like a KVM switch that makes it easy to switch between sources.
Its QD-OLED panel delivers perfect blacks in dark rooms without any blooming around bright objects. It also gets bright enough for small highlights to pop, and colors are vivid. While it doesn't get bright enough to fight glare, its reflection handling is good enough to use in most well-lit rooms. However, reflections from bright light sources, like a sunny window, can get distracting, and if you think that would bother you, check out the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 instead. It has a matte coating that spreads reflections out well, but it tends to cost a bit more than the MSI.
If you don't need a premium option with a high 4k resolution like the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED, check out the less expensive MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED instead. Besides the fact that it has a smaller screen, it's very similar in terms of features to its more expensive sibling, as it also has a KVM switch, USB hub, and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of modern graphics cards. It performs as you'd expect for gaming, with a fast response time, and vivid colors.
However, the main difference is that it has a lower 1440p resolution, so images aren't as detailed, and text isn't as sharp. That said, it has a higher 360Hz refresh rate that's ideal for competitive gaming, and the lower resolution makes it easier for your graphics card to maintain high frame rates. If you don't need such a high refresh rate, there are some 240Hz OLED monitors you can get for a bit cheaper, like the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG. However, its colors aren't vivid, so the MSI still offers the best performance in this price range.
If you prefer saving money or you don't need an OLED's high-end performance, check out a mid-range option like the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx, which is worth getting when it's on sale. There are a few trade-offs, as it doesn't deliver the same deep blacks or have a near-instantaneous response time as the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. That said, its motion handling is still consistently good across its VRR range, so there isn't much blur with fast-moving objects. It also has a lower 160Hz refresh rate, which is still good for most gamers, and it has a higher 4k resolution for sharper images.
On top of its gaming perks, it has good picture quality whether you're gaming in SDR or HDR. It has a decent Mini LED local dimming feature that helps it display deep blacks next to bright highlights, and it also gets bright enough to make highlights pop. There are some downsides, though, as it has increased input lag with fixed 60Hz signals, which is disappointing for playing reaction-based games. However, you can avoid this issue if you start gaming at a higher refresh rate and use VRR to go down to 60Hz.
As you get into budget monitors, you get fewer features than with high-end models, but there are some that still offer both good gaming performance and picture quality. That's the case with the AOC Q27G3XMN, which is one of the few low-cost monitors to have Mini LED backlighting like the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx. Combining its high native contrast with its good local dimming, it displays deep blacks next to bright highlights, and there isn't too much blooming, either. It also gets very bright in HDR, so highlights pop against the rest of the image.
However, there are a few trade-offs versus the Acer, as it has a lower 1440p resolution, so images aren't as detailed. While it has a fast response time without much blur behind fast-moving objects, it has some black smearing, which is one of the downsides of its VA panel. If you can't find it available in your region, the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx is another great low-cost option with Mini LED backlighting and good picture quality. However, it has worse motion handling than the AOC.
Should you have a limited budget and need a simple gaming monitor, then check out the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B. It's a 1440p monitor that's sold as two separate variants at various retailers, with the 27GP850-B model having some extra features, like an overclockable 180Hz refresh rate and USB ports, but you can usually find the 27GP83B-B for cheaper. They're a clear step down from the AOC Q27G3XMN in terms of picture quality because they don't have local dimming, and with a low native contrast ratio, blacks look gray. This means that they have limited picture quality, but this is what you have to expect for such a cheap display.
That said, both the 27PG850-B and the 27GP83B-B have the basics for gaming, like a 165Hz native refresh rate and VRR support. Plus, motion looks better on these as they have less smearing than on the AOC. Even if they look bad in a dark room, they're good choices for gaming in a bright room, as they get bright enough to fight glare and have good reflection handling.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF is a competitor to the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED that also has a 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED panel. It has better color accuracy than the MSI, but not everyone may enjoy its curved screen.
See our reviewThe ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM is a 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED monitor like the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED that supports Dolby Vision, so content in that format looks better. It performs similarly and has extra features, but it also costs more than the MSI.
See our reviewThe Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 competes with the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED and performs similarly. You can't go wrong with either monitor, especially if you can find them at the same price, but the Gigabyte can be harder to find at times.
See our reviewThe ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS is an entry-level 1440p monitor that performs similarly to the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B. It has a few other features, like a USB-C port, but it costs more than the LG, so it isn't worth spending more on if you need something cheap.
See our reviewThe Sony INZONE M10S is a 1440p gaming monitor with a higher refresh rate than the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It's something to consider if you'll take advantage of a high 480Hz refresh rate, but it also costs more than the MSI and has less vivid colors.
See our reviewFeb 19, 2025: We replaced the Dell G2724D with the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B because the Dell is hard to find. We also replaced the LG 32GS95UE-B with the Sony INZONE M10S in the Notable Mentions, as the Sony is cheaper. We introduced a new format to the article and updated the text to reflect these changes.
Jan 22, 2025: We replaced the Samsung Odyssey Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 with the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED as the MSI is cheaper and has a few more features. We also replaced the Dell Alienware AW2725DF with the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 in the Notable Mentions.
Nov 28, 2024: Replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 with the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED, as it offers very similar performance at a lower price.
Oct 10, 2024: We replaced the Dell Alienware AW2725DF with the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 for consistency with other recommendations. We also made several changes in the Notable Mentions to better represent the current gaming monitor market and reflect changes in the recommendation. We removed the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG, Dell Alienware AW3423DWF, and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60 and added the Dell Alienware AW3225QF, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS, and the AW2725DF.
Aug 16, 2024: We replaced the Dell Alienware AW3225QF with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 as the Samsung dropped in price. We also replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 with the Dell Alienware AW2725DF because the Gigabyte is out of stock. In Notable Mentions, we replaced the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 and the Gigabyte GS27QC with the LG 32GS95UE-B, ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG, and the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60 to be more representative of the current gaming market.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best monitors for PC and console gaming currently available. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.
What do you think of our picks? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying recommendation from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
Update: Replaced the AOC CQ27G2 with the Dell S2722DGM for consistency with other articles; added the LG 45GR95QE-B to Notable Mentions.
What do you think of these changes? Let us know