Getting a monitor that delivers optimal HDR picture quality and gaming performance is beneficial for playing the latest games. There are a few factors that make a monitor great for HDR, most notably its contrast ratio. A high contrast ratio helps the monitor display deep blacks against bright objects, and when combined with an effective local dimming feature and high brightness, it can make those highlights pop against the rest of the image. You'll also want something that displays a wide range of vivid colors in HDR so that images are life-like and realistic.
Although most monitors are still behind TVs in terms of overall image quality and processing in HDR, there are some monitors with OLED panels or Mini LED backlighting that provide fantastic performance. While there's a big gap between premium and budget-friendly monitors in terms of picture quality, there are some entry-level models that are getting better for HDR. Besides picture quality, you'll also want to consider a monitor's gaming performance, particularly with its motion handling, so that fast-moving objects look sharp. Low input lag is also important, but most monitors have low input lag anyway.
We've bought and tested more than 335 monitors, and below, you'll find our recommendations for the best HDR gaming monitors. Also, see our recommendations for the best OLED monitors, the best 4k HDR monitors, and the best Mini LED monitors.
The best gaming monitor for HDR that we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM. It offers both high-end gaming performance and premium picture quality. It's a 32-inch, 4k monitor that's fantastic for gaming because of its near-instantaneous response time, which results in crystal-clear motion in games with no distracting blur trail. Its 240Hz refresh rate benefits most gamers, and it has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of both the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S.
HDR content looks amazing because its QD-OLED panel has a near-infinite contrast ratio, and highlights really pop. It also displays perfect blacks in dark rooms, but they look purple in bright rooms as ambient light causes the black levels to rise. Luckily, it even displays an incredibly wide color gamut with remarkable color volume, so your favorite games look stunningly vivid and life-like, and the high resolution makes content appear full of detail. It even supports Dolby Vision after a firmware update and has different modes available in HDR, giving it an advantage over other monitors. However, it's expensive, and if you don't need these extra features, you can get very similar picture quality with the cheaper MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED. But, the MSI can also be harder to find at times.
If you don't need a high-end 4k monitor like the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, check out the lower-end MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It has a QD-OLED panel like the ASUS, so the picture quality is nearly the same in HDR with deep blacks and vivid colors, but there are a few trade-offs for getting the cheaper MSI. It has a lower resolution than the ASUS, so images aren't as detailed, and it has a smaller screen, but size is a personal preference anyway.
Besides that, it's still fantastic for gaming as it has a near-instantaneous response time, so fast-moving objects are sharp, and it even has a higher 360Hz refresh rate, ideal for competitive gaming. It also has HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take advantage of modern graphics cards and gaming consoles. This includes supporting any signal from consoles like downscaled 4k @ 120Hz, which is useful because the Xbox Series X|S only supports HDR with 4k signals, but unlike the ASUS, it doesn't support Dolby Vision. If you can't find this monitor available in your region, you can also consider the similar Dell Alienware AW2725DF, but it lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and tends to cost a bit more.
If you don't need high-end QD-OLEDs like the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM or the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED, you can still find the best HDR monitor for gaming in the mid-range price category, with the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG. It's an OLED monitor, but unlike the higher-end monitors, it has a WOLED panel and not QD-OLED, so colors aren't as vivid. That said, it still offers incredible picture quality in HDR with deep blacks, and it also gets bright enough to make small highlights pop.
Aside from those small differences, it provides everything you'd expect from a gaming monitor, like a near-instantaneous response time and support for all common VRR formats. It has a lower 240Hz refresh rate than the MSI, but it's still high enough for most gamers. Unfortunately, it doesn't support HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, so it can't take full advantage of HDMI 2.1 sources. If that's important to you, the LG 27GS95QE-B is a similar monitor that supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, but it doesn't get as bright as the ASUS.
There aren't as many monitors with good HDR performance in the budget category, but some are still ahead of the competition, like the AOC Q27G3XMN. It's a step down from the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG because it doesn't have an OLED panel, so it doesn't display the same deep and inky blacks without any blooming. Instead, it uses Mini LED backlighting with a good local dimming feature that helps it improve its picture quality in dark scenes with deep blacks next to bright highlights, but there's just a bit more blooming compared to an OLED. On the plus side, it gets very bright in HDR, so highlights really pop.
While it doesn't have a 240Hz refresh rate like the ASUS, its 180Hz refresh rate is still good enough for most gamers. And while its response time isn't near-instantaneous either, it's still fast, but there's some smearing with fast-moving objects. Unfortunately, it doesn't have HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of gaming consoles either, but that's what you have to expect for a budget monitor.
Should you be on a strict budget and looking for a cheap monitor, check out the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx. It's actually very similar in specs and features to the AOC Q27G3XMN, but there are a few trade-offs when it comes to performance. It has Mini LED backlighting like the AOC and delivers good picture quality in HDR with deep blacks and bright highlights, but its local dimming feature results in more black crush and blooming. However, it does get brighter than the AOC and even has more vivid colors.
Overall, it's a decent gaming monitor thanks to its 170Hz refresh rate, but there's smearing with fast-moving objects. It has low input lag for a responsive feel and a handful of gaming features, like Black Boost and Aim Point, that give you a competitive advantage.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF is a 4k, 240Hz QD-OLED that competes with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM. It tends to cost less than the ASUS and also supports Dolby Vision, but it has a curved screen that not everyone may like.
See our reviewThe LG 32GS95UE-B is a unique 4k, 240Hz monitor that can become a 1080p, 480Hz monitor with its Dual-Mode feature. This makes it better than the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM if you want such a high refresh rate. However, because it has a WOLED panel, colors aren't as vivid as on the ASUS.
See our reviewThe Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 is a premium gaming monitor that has most of the same specs as the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM. It has a few different features, like a built-in smart platform, and usually costs less, but it doesn't support Dolby Vision, which is disappointing if you have sources that use it.
See our reviewThe Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 is an upper mid-range monitor that's a competitor to the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It's something to consider if you can't find the MSI available in your region, but the Gigabyte also tends to cost a bit more.
See our reviewThe Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx is a mid-range 4k monitor that gets brighter than the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG thanks to its Mini LED backlighting. However, it has a lower refresh rate and tends to cost more. That said, it's worth considering when you can find it on sale.
See our reviewWe replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM because the ASUS supports Dolby Vision. We also replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 with the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED for consistency with other recommendations. We moved the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx to the Notable Mentions, as it increased in price, and added the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx as the 'Best Cheap.' We also removed the Dell Alienware AW2725DF and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 from the Notable Mentions based on changes in the recommendation.
Oct 03, 2024: We made several changes to ensure consistency with other recommendations. We replaced the Dell Alienware AW3225QF, Dell Alienware AW2725DF, LG 27GS95QE-B, and the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx with the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80, Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3, ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG, and the AOC Q27G3XMN, respectively. In Notable Mentions, we replaced the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 and added the AW3225QF and the AW2725DF.
Aug 05, 2024: We added the LG 27GS95QE-B to better reflect the HDR gaming monitor market. We replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9/G95SC S49CG95, Cooler Master Tempest GP27U, and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM in the Notable Mentions with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, LG 32GS95UE-B, Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3, and the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biix to reflect changes and new monitors that we've tested.
May 09, 2024: Replaced the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF with the higher refresh rate Dell Alienware AW2725DF for consistency with other recommendations. Replaced the Dell S3422DWG with the AOC Q27G3XMN, which has better picture quality. Removed the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G85SB S34BG85 and the Dell Alienware AW3423DW from Notable Mentions as they aren't alternatives to any of the main monitors.
Feb 21, 2024: Replaced the Dell Alienware AW3423DW with the Dell Alienware AW3225QF as the 'Best HDR Gaming Monitor' as it has better performance. Replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM with the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF as 'Best Upper Mid-Range,' as it can cost less than the ASUS and has better HDR performance. Removed the 'Best 4k HDR Gaming Monitor' category with the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, as our new 'Best HDR Gaming Monitor' is 4k. Added the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9/G95SC S49CG95, Dell Alienware AW3423DW, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM, and AOC Q27G3XMN as Notable Mentions. Removed the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9/G95NA S49AG95 and Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 as Notable Mentions.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best HDR monitors for gaming currently available. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price, and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.