If you're a competitive or esports gamer, even a small edge can help you win. You want the screen to display the signal from your device as quickly as possible. As a result, having a monitor with a high refresh rate is critical, as these monitors allow for extremely low input lag and significantly reduce persistence blur. However, a monitor with a high refresh rate can still have noticeable input lag, so it's important to look at its input lag measurements rather than just its refresh rate.
As an esports or competitive gamer, you'll also want to look at response time, as the lower it is, the sooner you'll have a usable image and the less blur you'll see. We call the combination of input lag and first response time the "signal-to-response latency," which is the total delay from when the monitor receives a signal to the result appearing on the screen. The combination of input lag and first response time is a better indicator of responsiveness than a monitor's refresh rate, as you'll see below. VRR support is also important for a responsive experience with reduced tearing, but almost every modern gaming monitor works with FreeSync and G-SYNC. We test all of these things and much more as part of the nearly 400 tests we do for each monitor.
While it's not essential to competitive performance, monitors with bright highlights and vivid colors are more engaging and immersive. Conveniently, the most responsive monitors also have the best picture quality.
We've bought and tested more than 345 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best monitors with a high refresh rate. Also, check out our recommendations for the best 240Hz monitors, the best gaming monitors, and the best 1440p gaming monitors.
The best high refresh rate monitor is the 480Hz Sony INZONE M10S. It has exceptionally low input lag of 1.7 ms, so it's remarkably responsive. It also has an exceptionally low response time, with an average first response transition time of 0.2 ms. This means that scenes with lots of motion are extremely sharp, and the screen rapidly transitions to a new scene. In total, the monitor's signal-to-response latency is 1.9 ms, so it has remarkable responsiveness overall.
Additionally, it has outstanding picture quality, so you'll enjoy vivid colors and bright highlights during long gaming sessions. However, it has distracting VRR flicker with changing frame rates. If you're looking for a monitor with an option to reduce VRR flicker, check out the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP. However, its flicker control setting causes stuttering, it costs more, and it has more bugs.
If you don't need the ultra-high refresh rate of the Sony INZONE M10S, check out the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It's nearly as responsive as the Sony, as its signal-to-response latency is 2.2 ms, which is only 0.5 ms slower. As an OLED, it also has an ultra-fast response time, so fast-moving scenes are extremely crisp.
Some gamers may even prefer the MSI over the Sony, as it has better picture quality. It displays a wider range of colors more vividly, creating an engaging and immersive experience. However, like many OLEDs, it does have noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates.
If you only need a 240Hz display, look at the 27-inch 1440p ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG. It has slightly higher input lag than the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED, but as an OLED, it still has the same fast response times as the MSI. This means its signal-to-response latency is 2.9 ms, only 0.7 ms more than the MSI, so it still feels extremely responsive.
Like other OLEDs, it has fantastic picture quality, with vivid colors and highlights that pop for an engaging experience during long sessions. Additionally, it has a flicker reduction feature, though it adds a bit of stuttering. However, if you want a larger 240Hz monitor with a 4k resolution, check out the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED. It has more vivid colors than the ASUS, but it requires a powerful graphics card to maintain the high resolution and costs more.
If you're looking for a non-OLED monitor and want a responsive experience, check out the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K. Despite having a 360Hz refresh rate, it's less responsive than the 240Hz ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG because of its slower response time. It has almost the same input lag as the 360Hz MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED, but its total signal-to-display latency is much higher at 4.8 ms. Additionally, due to its TN panel, it has worse picture quality, as deep blacks look gray, highlights don't pop in HDR, and colors aren't vivid, so it's not as engaging when playing immersive games.
Despite this, it has a few features that the monitors above don't. It has backlight strobing that works at refresh rates up to 360Hz, which helps reduce persistence blur without image duplication. Unlike the monitors above, it also doesn't have too much VRR flicker, which is great if you experience rapidly changing frame rates and find VRR flicker distracting. It also has no risk of burn-in when exposed to the same static elements over time.
If you're on a budget but still want a monitor with a high refresh rate, check out the Dell G2524H. It has a 280Hz max refresh rate and extremely low input lag. Unlike the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K, it has an IPS panel with a slightly higher signal-to-response latency of 6.1 ms. That said, it's still extremely responsive compared to most other monitors, and you have to expect a reduction in performance with such a cheap monitor. Like the BenQ, it has a 1080p resolution, so the monitor's image doesn't look very detailed, although the lower resolution can help increase the frame rate.
It has comparable picture quality to the BenQ, so deep blacks appear gray in a dark room, and colors aren't vivid. However, it doesn't have noticeable VRR flicker, which is great if you're sensitive to it.
The LG 32GS95UE-B is a premium 32-inch gaming monitor that competes with the Sony INZONE M10S and has a higher resolution in its default 240Hz mode. Its Dual-Mode lets you use either a 4k @ 240Hz or a 1080p @ 480Hz mode depending on whether you want an immersive experience or extreme responsiveness. However, it's more expensive and is slightly less responsive than the Sony.
See our reviewThe Dell Alienware AW2523HF is a budget monitor with a higher 360Hz refresh rate than the Dell G2524H. However, it usually costs more than the G2524H, and its signal-to-response latency is higher.
See our reviewThe Samsung Odyssey OLED G60SD S27DG602S is a 360Hz monitor with VRR flicker control, unlike the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. However, it has a slower response time.
See our reviewThe Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 has a 360Hz QD-OLED display, and unlike the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED, it has integrated speakers. However, it usually costs more and has slightly more input lag.
See our reviewThe Dell Alienware AW2725DF is a 360Hz QD-OLED monitor like the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It has more USB-A ports but a slightly higher input lag.
See our reviewMar 19, 2025: Replaced the LG 32GS95UE-B with the Sony INZONE M10S, as it's more responsive, has a higher resolution at its max refresh rate, and costs less. Replaced the ASUS ROG Swift Pro PG248QP with the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K, as the ASUS is hard to find. Replaced the ViewSonic XG2431 with the Dell G2524H, as it's more responsive and costs less. Replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP with the LG 32GS95UE-B in the Notable Mentions.
Feb 19, 2025: We introduced a new format to the article and updated the text to reflect these changes.
Jan 16, 2025: Renamed 'Best 500Hz+' to 'Best Non-OLED' and changed order for enhanced clarity. Confirmed that our selections are consistent and up-to-date.
Dec 19, 2024: We've verified our picks for accuracy and consistency but haven't made any changes.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best currently available monitors with a high refresh rate. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each market segment. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of our monitors. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.
What do you think of our picks? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying recommendation from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
Update: Replaced the LG 32GS95UE-B with the Sony INZONE M10S, as it’s more responsive, has a higher resolution at its max refresh rate, and costs less. Replaced the ASUS ROG Swift Pro PG248QP with the BenQ ZOWIE XL2566K, as the ASUS is hard to find. Replaced the ViewSonic XG2431 with the Dell G2524H, as it’s more responsive and costs less. Replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP with the LG 32GS95UE-B in the Notable Mentions.
What do you think of these changes? Let us know