Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

The 5 Best Monitors For PS5/PS5 Pro of 2025

Updated Aug 20, 2025 at 03:26 pm
Best PS5/PS5 Pro Monitors

When looking for the best gaming monitor for PS5 or PS5 Pro, it's beneficial to get something that can take full advantage of the console and its features, like HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and HDMI Forum VRR support. While 4k monitors deliver the most details, you can also get a 1080p or 1440p monitor, as the PS5 supports any of those resolutions. On top of those, the PS5 Pro also supports an 8k resolution, but there aren't many 8k monitors available. A monitor's size is another consideration, but that's a personal preference. Keep in mind that the console doesn't support ultrawide signals, so you'll see black bars on the sides of ultrawide monitors.

Besides compatibility, we also test for multiple factors that impact your gaming experience as part of our extensive testing, which includes thousands of measurements. For example, a fast response time is important if you want minimal blur behind fast-moving objects. You should also consider the monitor's input lag, but most have low enough input lag anyway. Good picture quality also improves your gaming experience, so you'll want something with deep blacks, bright highlights, and vivid colors.

Another thing to consider is whether the monitor has an audio output if you want to connect speakers. While most monitors have one, you'd have to consider alternate connections for monitors that don't, like connecting directly to the controller or using an HDMI audio extractor.

We've bought and tested more than 365 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best gaming monitors for PS5 that you can buy. Also, see our recommendations for the best monitors for the Nintendo Switch 2, the best gaming monitors for PS4, and the best 120Hz monitors. If you want more than just a monitor, then check out the best TVs for PS5/PS5 Pro and the best PS5/PS5 Pro headsets.

Quick Look

In-Test Picture
Best Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM
Console Gaming
9.4
PS5 Compatibility
10
CAD @ 120Hz
9.9
High-end 4k QD-OLED. Has sharp motion & incredible for HDR.
In-Test Picture
Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro: ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG
Console Gaming
9.1
PS5 Compatibility
9.3
CAD @ 120Hz
9.8
Lower 1440p resolution, with the same incredible motion.
In-Test Picture
Best Mid-Range Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro: LG 32GR93U-B
Console Gaming
8.2
PS5 Compatibility
10
CAD @ 120Hz
8.1
4k monitor with HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, but drop in performance.
In-Test Picture
Best Budget Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro: AOC Q27G3XMN
Console Gaming
7.4
PS5 Compatibility
4.9
CAD @ 120Hz
8.5
1440p with better picture quality; lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
In-Test Picture
Best Cheap Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro: MSI G274QPF-QD
 Product is using an older test methodology
Console Gaming
6.1
PS5 Compatibility
4.9
CAD @ 120Hz
7.2
Low input lag and 120Hz support; worse HDR performance.
  1. Best Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro

    The best monitor for PS5 that we've tested is the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. It's a high-end 4k, 27-inch monitor that's incredible for gaming. While the monitor's max 240Hz refresh rate is too high to use with the PS5 or PS5 Pro, it still supports any signal, including 4k @ 120Hz, thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. This high refresh rate is also beneficial if you want to connect your gaming PC on the side. On top of that, it has a near-instantaneous response time for crystal-clear motion with fast-moving objects.

    Besides its high-end performance for console gaming, it also delivers premium picture quality thanks to its QD-OLED panel. HDR games look fantastic, with rich, vivid colors. The monitor has near-infinite contrast, displaying deep blacks next to bright highlights in dark rooms, though deep blacks look purple in bright rooms. If you'd prefer a monitor that displays fairly deep blacks in bright rooms, take a look at the larger LG 32GS95UE-B. However, its colors are less vivid, and it doesn't get as bright in SDR.

  2. Best Upper Mid-Range Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro

    If you don't need the best 4k monitor for PS5 with premium features but still want something with fantastic gaming performance, then an upper mid-range option like the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG is a great alternative. It's different from the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM because it has a lower 1440p resolution. While this means images are less detailed, it still supports HDMI 2.1 bandwidth and can downscale 4k @ 120Hz signals.

    However, it's otherwise very similar to the PG27UCDM, as both have QD-OLED panels. This means it has a near-instantaneous response time, resulting in extremely sharp motion. It also has vivid colors and displays deep blacks in dark rooms. However, it makes deep blacks look purple in bright rooms. If you'd prefer a monitor that displays fairly deep blacks even in bright rooms and gets brighter, look into the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG instead. However, it lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of the PS5 and PS5 Pro.

  3. Best Mid-Range Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro

    While OLEDs like the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM offer the best gaming performance and picture quality, they're also expensive. If you want to save money, look into a mid-range monitor like the LG 32GR93U-B. It's a drop in performance and picture quality from the OLED monitors because it has a low contrast ratio, and blacks look gray in dark rooms. It doesn't even have a local dimming feature to further improve the picture quality, but that's the trade-off for getting something cheaper.

    That said, the 32GR93U-B has a higher 4k resolution than the XG27ACDNG, delivering detailed images. It also has everything you'd expect to find in a gaming monitor, like HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. Even though it doesn't have a near-instantaneous response time like an OLED, motion still looks sharp at any refresh rate. You can also check out the LG 27GR93U-B if you prefer a smaller 27-inch screen. It's a similar monitor that tends to cost less, but it has slightly worse motion handling.

  4. Best Budget Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro

    If you're looking for the best PS5 monitor on a budget, check out the AOC Q27G3XMN. It's different from the LG 32GR93U-B because it has a 1440p resolution and lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of the PS5, so it doesn't support HDMI Forum VRR to reduce screen tearing with the console. That said, this is what you have to expect from a low-cost monitor, and you can still play games with a 1440p resolution up to 120Hz or downscaled 4k @ 60Hz.

    It's better than the LG and most other entry-level monitors in terms of picture quality because it features Mini LED backlighting and has a good local dimming feature. This means it displays deep blacks next to bright highlights, which is great for HDR gaming, and it also gets bright enough to fight glare in well-lit rooms. In terms of gaming, it has a fast response time, but there's some smearing with fast-moving objects. If you don't mind a bit of extra blur with fast-moving objects, and you'd prefer better local dimming performance and a brighter display, check out the similar AOC Q27G40XMN.

  5. Best Cheap Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro

    If the AOC Q27G3XMN is still a bit expensive for you, check out the MSI G274QPF-QD. It performs well for SDR gaming, as it supports 60Hz and 120Hz, like the AOC. It also has low input lag for a responsive feel. Additionally, while its motion handling is a bit worse than the AOC, fast-moving objects still look fairly crisp, and it doesn't have any of the AOC's smearing. That said, like the AOC, it doesn't support VRR with the PS5, so motion is less smooth than it could be in games that support VRR.

    The biggest difference between the AOC and the MSI is how they perform in HDR. While the MSI displays a wide range of colors, they don't look nearly as vivid as those on the AOC. Additionally, it doesn't have a local dimming system, and its contrast isn't good, so deep blacks look gray in a dark room. It also doesn't get bright enough for highlights to pop. However, if you're okay with its limited HDR performance and lack of VRR compatibility, it's a good option for the price.

Notable Mentions

  • Sony INZONE M9 II: 

    The Sony INZONE M9 II is a mid-range 4k gaming monitor that has unique 'Made for PS5' features, like Auto HDR Tone Mapping. It's a good choice if you want such features, and it has better picture quality than the LG 32GR93U-B. However, it also costs more than the LG.

     See our review
  • Dell Alienware AW2725Q: 

    The Dell Alienware AW2725Q is a premium gaming monitor that competes with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM. It performs similarly, as it's also a QD-OLED, but it doesn't get as bright.

     See our review
  • Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx: 

    The Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx is a mid-range 4k monitor in the same price range as the LG 32GR93U-B. Thanks to its Mini LED backlighting, it offers better picture quality. However, the main downside of using it for console gaming is that it has increased input lag with 60Hz signals.

     See our review
  • Dell Alienware AW3225DM: 

    The Dell Alienware AW3225DM is a larger alternative to the AOC Q27G3XMN. It supports VRR with the PS5, which the AOC doesn't. However, it has worse HDR performance and it doesn't have a headphone output.

     See our review

Recent Updates

  1. Aug 20, 2025: 

    We added the MSI G274QPF-QD as the 'Best Cheap Monitor For PS5/PS5 Pro'. Additionally, we added the Dell Alienware AW3225DM to the Notable Mentions.

  2. Jul 08, 2025: 

    We replaced the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED with the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM, as the MSI is hard to find. We also replaced the LG 27GS95QE-B with the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG, as it costs less and has more vivid colors. Finally, we removed the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED and replaced the Dell Alienware AW3225QF with the Dell Alienware AW2725Q in the Notable Mentions.

  3. Apr 03, 2025: 

    We removed the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B because it's hard to find. We also added the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM to the Notable Mentions.

  4. Feb 19, 2025: 

    We replaced the Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G80SD S32DG80 with the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED for consistency with other articles. We also replaced the Dell G2724D with the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B, as the Dell is hard to find. Lastly, in the Notable Mentions, we replaced the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 with the Sony INZONE M9 II and the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. We also introduced a new format to the article and updated the text to reflect these changes.

  5. Jan 14, 2025: 

    Verified our picks for accuracy and consistency.

All Reviews

Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best PS5 monitors, including the best PS5 Pro monitor, currently available. They're adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.

If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here's the list of all of our monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.

Comments

  1. Recommendation

Best PS5/PS5 Pro Monitors: Main Discussion

What do you think of our picks? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying recommendation from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hey there, thanks for your feedback! I’d like to clear up a few things in what you just said. The color banding on the A80J didn’t start 14 months in, it was always there, but our methodology changed, so it was retested. The scores on both TVs are also unrelated to the longevity test. Those tests started after we had already completed reviewing both TVs, and although it’s disappointing that the A80K failed, this doesn’t impact the scores as this sort of failure can happen with any TV. Our longevity test is designed to push these TVs the limits to look for failures, and one specific unit failing doesn’t mean that that specific model or even that brand is more prone to that sort of failure.

    Rtings literally posted this on the gradient score for the A80J: “When we originally tested the TV, it performed much better. The banding could be more prevalent because of general panel degradation, but we don’t know for sure.”

    In other words, you say yourselves it may be caused by panel degradation (& didn’t update the score of the TV until late 2023/2024), yet when it comes to a Samsung TV with poor build quality out of the box, you don’t give it a bad score as say it may just be the one TV, even though Samsung has had issues with bent QD-OLED panels on it’s B & D series TV’s.

  2. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Your long term gradient score on this TV is ridiculous & unfairly measures it against everything else. Your comparison shows the A80K as being exactly the same as the A80J (To the point Rtings even wrote that both TV’s are so similar that buying either should just come down to which is cheaper). Yet the A80K is rated at 8.9 even though your unit completely failed 4 months in, while the A80J is rated at 8.7 due to colour banding which started 14 months into owning the unit. The scores just make no sense.

    Hey there, thanks for your feedback! I’d like to clear up a few things in what you just said. The color banding on the A80J didn’t start 14 months in, it was always there, but our methodology changed, so it was retested. The scores on both TVs are also unrelated to the longevity test. Those tests started after we had already completed reviewing both TVs, and although it’s disappointing that the A80K failed, this doesn’t impact the scores as this sort of failure can happen with any TV. Our longevity test is designed to push these TVs the limits to look for failures, and one specific unit failing doesn’t mean that that specific model or even that brand is more prone to that sort of failure.

  3. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Your long term gradient score on this TV is ridiculous & unfairly measures it against everything else. Your comparison shows the A80K as being exactly the same as the A80J (To the point Rtings even wrote that both TV’s are so similar that buying either should just come down to which is cheaper). Yet the A80K is rated at 8.9 even though your unit completely failed 4 months in, while the A80J is rated at 8.7 due to colour banding which started 14 months into owning the unit.

    The scores just make no sense.

    Edited 1 year ago: Changed a word written