The Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 is a high-end QD-OLED gaming monitor with a 1440p resolution and 360Hz refresh rate. Part of the AORUS gaming lineup, it's one of a few that have a QD-OLED panel, as it sits alongside other models like the 1440p FO27Q2 and the 4k Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P, which both have a lower 240Hz refresh rate. This monitor also competes with other displays that use the same panel, like the Dell Alienware AW2725DF and the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It's feature-packed with gaming perks like AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and different crosshairs and vision modes, including a Resolution Switch feature. It also has a USB-C port and a KVM switch, making it easy to multitask with different computers. Lastly, it has a few settings to prevent the risk of burn-in, and Gigabyte also offers a three-year warranty for the OLED panel, but this can change between countries.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 is outstanding for PC gaming. It has a high 360Hz refresh rate for a smooth gaming feel and supports all common VRR formats to reduce screen tearing. It also has a near-instantaneous response time for extremely sharp motion and low input lag for a responsive feel. Lastly, it delivers outstanding picture quality with deep and inky blacks and vivid colors with bright highlights for an immersive gaming experience.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 is fantastic for console gaming. Although it's limited to a 1440p resolution, it still takes full advantage of the Xbox Series X|S and PS5 thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. This means it supports any signal from either console. It even provides a life-like and immersive gaming experience thanks to its perfect blacks, vivid colors, and bright highlights. Motion is also sharp as it has a near-instantaneous response time, and it has low input lag for a responsive feel.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 is good for office use, but there are some limitations. It has useful office features, like a USB-C port and a KVM switch that makes it easy to change between different devices and use the same keyboard and mouse. It also has remarkable reflection handling, but it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare from really bright sources, and ambient light causes blacks to look purple. The biggest downsides are that it has worse text clarity than LED-backlit 27-inch, 1440p monitors due to its subpixel layout, and it has the risk of burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time.
Can't fight really intense glare.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 is incredible for content creation, with some limitations. It displays a wide range of accurate colors both in SDR and HDR, and it also makes them look vivid for realistic images. It even displays deep and inky blacks, ideal for editing content in dark rooms, but blacks look purple in bright rooms. It has worse text and image clarity than other 1440p, 27-inch monitors due to its subpixel layout too. On top of that, it risks permanent burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, which is problematic if you constantly have your editing program on the screen.
Can't fight really intense glare.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has decent brightness. It's bright enough to fight glare in most rooms with a few lights around, and highlights also pop in HDR, but it struggles to fight glare in really bright rooms.
Can't fight really intense glare.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has a near-instantaneous response time, resulting in exceptionally sharp motion.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 is outstanding for HDR. It displays deep and inky blacks without any blooming around bright objects thanks to its near-infinite contrast ratio and perfect black uniformity. It also displays a wide range of colors and makes them look vivid.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has outstanding SDR picture quality, displaying deep and inky blacks and a wide range of colors.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has fantastic color accuracy. Its dedicated sRGB mode is remarkably accurate before calibration, and the main benefit of calibrating it is that you can access settings that are locked out in the sRGB mode.
Added that the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED has a sharper image.
Added that the LG 27GX790A-B has a higher refresh rate.
Changed the SDR Brightness results to include APL Stabilize on 'High,' which allows the monitor to get bright, and for consistency with other reviews.
Added that the Sony INZONE M10S has lower input lag.
We tested the 27-inch Gigabyte FO27Q3, which is the only size available, and the results are only valid for this monitor. Gigabyte also has the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q2 available, which is another QD-OLED monitor, but it has a lower refresh rate. You can see the differences between the two monitors below.
Model | Size | Resolution | Panel Type | Refresh Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|
FO27Q3 | 27" | 1440p | QD-OLED | 360Hz |
FO27Q2 | 27" | 1440p | QD-OLED | 240Hz |
Our unit was manufactured in March 2024; you can see the label here. We tested it with firmware F03.
The Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 is an outstanding PC gaming monitor that combines its remarkable gaming performance with a fast response time for sharp motion and a high 360Hz refresh rate. It's ideal for almost any type of gamer and competes alongside the Dell Alienware AW2725DF as one of the best gaming monitors available unless you want a 4k resolution. In that case, the Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P can be a better choice for you, but it's more expensive. Otherwise, the cheaper FO27Q3 is a fantastic choice for any gamer.
Make sure to also check out our recommendations for the best 27-inch gaming monitors, the best gaming monitors, and the best 1440p gaming monitors.
The MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are similar monitors that have the same panel and many of the same features. The biggest difference is that the Gigabyte has lower input lag regardless of firmware, as you need to update the MSI's firmware to get the lowest input lag. On the other hand, the MSI delivers more power over USB-C, which is great if you want to connect a laptop.
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are both 1440p, 360Hz QD-OLEDs that compete against each other. They perform similarly and even have many of the same features, including a USB hub and KVM switch, but the USB-C port on the ASUS delivers more power than that on the Gigabyte.
The ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are both 27-inch OLED gaming monitors, but they have a few differences. They have different OLED panel types, with the Gigabyte being a QD-OLED with more vivid colors. The Gigabyte also has a higher refresh rate, which is ideal for competitive gaming. On the other hand, the ASUS gets brighter, so it's the better choice if you want something to use in a well-lit room.
The Dell Alienware AW2725DF and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are similar monitors that use the same QD-OLED panel. The Gigabyte has a few extra features, like HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, which is great for taking advantage of consoles and HDMI 2.1 graphics cards. It also has productivity perks like a KVM switch and DisplayPort Alt Mode. Choosing one over the other really comes down to knowing if you want those features or not, and depending on which monitor you can find for cheaper.
The Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 and the AOC AGON PRO AG276QZD2 are both 27-inch QD-OLED gaming monitors. The Gigabyte is the better option. It's more immersive, as it displays a wider range of more vivid colors. The Gigabyte also has a higher refresh rate than the AOC, leading to a smoother feel.
The Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 and the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP are 1440p OLED gaming monitors with a few differences. While they have similar gaming performance, the higher refresh rate on the ASUS is useful for playing games at high refresh rates, like if you're a competitive gamer. Their panel types also have some differences in picture quality as the Gigabyte has more vivid colors.
The Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are both QD-OLED monitors in the AORUS gaming lineup. There are a few differences between them, though, as the FO32U2P has a larger screen with a higher resolution for a more immersive experience, while the FO27Q3's higher refresh rate is great for PC gaming. The FO32U2P has a few extra features, like DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth, so compatible graphics cards don't need to use compression for demanding signals. The FO32U2P also has a DisplayPort output, which is great if you want to daisy chain a second display.
The Dell Alienware AW3225QF and the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 are different types of QD-OLED monitors. The Dell delivers a more detailed image thanks to its 4k resolution, while the Gigabyte is the better choice for competitive gaming as it has a higher refresh rate. They have features that can benefit different types of users, as the Dolby Vision and eARC support on the Dell is great for watching content, while the KVM switch and DisplayPort Alt Mode on the Gigabyte help for productivity.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has a simple design with a mainly gray body and some black accents throughout. It also features RGB lightning on the back.
The build quality is fantastic. There aren't any obvious issues, and the plastic stand, which features a metal base, holds the screen well. The circular piece that goes around where the monitor clips to the stand feels a bit loose, but it doesn't impact the user experience. Adjusting its height up and down feels smooth, and there isn't any noticeable noise from fans either.
The ergonomics are incredible as you can easily adjust it in many different ways. As you can only rotate it in one direction, the inputs always face to the left if you want to use the monitor in a vertical orientation. The stand also features a removable clip for cable management.
The thickness measurement is with the screen at the minimum height adjustment, but because it's on an angle, the thickness with the screen at the max height adjustment is 6.7 inches (17.0 cm).
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has a near-infinite contrast ratio thanks to its QD-OLED panel that can turn individual pixels on and off. This means it displays deep blacks next to bright highlights in dark rooms. However, like any other QD-OLED, ambient light causes blacks to look purple, so it doesn't display the same deep blacks in bright rooms.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 doesn't have a backlight, so it doesn't require a local dimming feature. However, with a near-infinite contrast ratio, there isn't any blooming around bright objects, and it's the equivalent of a perfect local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can see how the screen performs and compare it with a monitor that has local dimming.
Settings
The SDR brightness is good. It gets bright enough to fight glare if you set APL Stabilize to 'High,' but it still struggles to fight really intense glare. That said, the trade-off is that there's a difference in brightness between different content, which can be distracting, like if you're opening and closing windows. If that bothers you, it's better to set APL Stabilize to 'Low' as there's more consistent brightness. The brightness is similar between APL Stabilize on 'Middle' and 'High' for the most part, except 2% windows get much brighter on 'High,' which you can see in the results below.
Another thing to note is that with APL Stabilize on 'High,' there's an issue with raised black levels. You can change Gamma to '2.4' to fix this issue.
APL Stabilize | Low | Middle |
---|---|---|
Real Scene | 265 cd/m² | 329 cd/m² |
Peak 2% Window | 259 cd/m² | 458 cd/m² |
Peak 10% Window | 255 cd/m² | 458 cd/m² |
Peak 25% Window | 257 cd/m² | 368 cd/m² |
Peak 50% Window | 258 cd/m² | 314 cd/m² |
Peak 100% Window | 259 cd/m² | 267 cd/m² |
Sustained 2% Window | 258 cd/m² | 454 cd/m² |
Sustained 10% Window | 253 cd/m² | 456 cd/m² |
Sustained 25% Window | 256 cd/m² | 367 cd/m² |
Sustained 50% Window | 258 cd/m² | 312 cd/m² |
Sustained 100% Window | 258 cd/m² | 265 cd/m² |
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has okay HDR brightness. It gets brightest with small highlights, so they really pop against the rest of the image, but it can't maintain that high brightness with larger objects. The PQ EOTF tracking is also good, so the image is accurate until there's a gradual roll-off before a sharp cut-off at the peak brightness. These results are with the following settings:
These settings are the brightest and most accurate, as the 'HDR Game' only reaches a Real Scene brightness of 380 cd/m² and has worse PQ EOTF tracking as it overbrightens most scenes. You can also see the brightness for the 'HDR' mode with APL Stabilize on 'Middle':
In September 2024, Gigabyte released firmware update F05, which adds 'HDR Peak 1000' picture mode. However, it has almost the same brightness as the 'HDR' mode, and has worse PQ EOTF tracking.
The horizontal viewing angle is exceptional. Although it technically isn't perfect, the image remains consistent from any angle without inconsistencies, and you can easily share your screen with someone else.
The vertical viewing angle is remarkable. The image looks the same, even if you're standing up and looking down at it.
The accuracy before calibration in the sRGB mode is fantastic. It locks colors to the sRGB color space, so they aren't oversaturated, and both the white balance and color temperature are incredible, too. However, gamma is a bit high, causing most content to be too dark. These results are with APL Stabilize on 'Low,' as setting it to 'Middle' or 'High' results in much worse gamma tracking and color accuracy. The sRGB mode also locks a few picture settings, but you'll need to use another, less accurate mode if you want access to those settings, as you can see here.
The accuracy after calibration is fantastic, but calibrating it doesn't fix the gamma issues with APL Stabilize on 'Middle' or 'High,' so it's better to leave it on 'Low' if you want the best accuracy.
The SDR color gamut is fantastic. It displays all colors needed for the common sRGB color space, and it also displays a wide range of colors in Adobe RGB, but it oversaturates some colors in that space.
The HDR color gamut is remarkable. It displays nearly all colors in the common DCI-P3 and wider Rec. 2020 color space, but it undersaturates them in Rec. 2020. Unlike in SDR, the color accuracy is the same no matter what you set APL Stabilize to.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has an amazing HDR color volume. Thanks to its QD-OLED panel, it displays bright and vivid colors without any issues, and dark colors look fantastic, too.
The text clarity is decent, though it's not as good as some other 27-inch 1440p monitors. This is because programs don't render text well with the monitor's triangular subpixel arrangement. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) improves the boldness of letters. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see them in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off.
Due to the triangular subpixel layout, there's some color fringing around letters and at the edge of windows, though it's hard to see unless you look closely at the monitor. Although we didn't experience any eye strain during testing, this is something that changes from person to person, and it depends on how sensitive you are to this subpixel layout.
The reflection handling is remarkable. The glossy coating does an amazing job at reducing glare even from bright light sources, but the biggest downside is that ambient light causes the black levels to raise, so blacks look purple. You can see an example of that here. This is typical of QD-OLEDs, and it's nothing out of the ordinary.
Your graphics card needs to use Display Stream Compression (DSC) to reach the max refresh rate over DisplayPort or with 10-bit signals over HDMI, but there's no setting to disable DSC at all on the monitor. If you're looking for a monitor with a higher refresh rate, check out the LG 27GX790A-B.
NVIDIA | VRR Min | VRR Max |
---|---|---|
DisplayPort | <20Hz | 360Hz |
HDMI | <20Hz | 360Hz |
AMD | VRR Min | VRR Max |
---|---|---|
DisplayPort | <20Hz | 360Hz |
HDMI | <20Hz | 360Hz |
On top of FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility, this monitor also supports HDMI Forum VRR.
Frame Rate | CAD Heatmap | RT Chart | Pursuit Photo |
---|---|---|---|
358 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
240 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
165 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
144 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
120 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
100 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
80 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
60 | Heatmap | Chart | Photo |
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has outstanding motion handling across its entire refresh rate range with VRR enabled. CAD remains low throughout, and there's minimal blur with fast-moving objects.
The refresh rate compliance is outstanding. As it has a near-instantaneous response time, it makes full color transitions before drawing the next frame.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 doesn't have an optional black frame insertion feature to reduce persistence blur.
Unfortunately, this monitor has noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates. It's most noticeable in dark scenes, and you can also see it in dark areas of bright scenes. This is typical of OLEDs, and the best way to reduce the chances of this happening is either by setting a frame cap or disabling VRR altogether.
The backlight isn't technically flicker-free because it has a slight dip in brightness that corresponds to the 360Hz refresh rate. However, it isn't considered pulse-width modulation like on LED-backlit monitors because it isn't a full-screen on-and-off flicker, and you won't notice it.
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 has low input lag for a responsive feel. If you're looking for a monitor with even lower input lag, check out the Sony INZONE M10S.
If you like this monitor's outstanding picture quality but want a sharper image, consider the 4k MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED.
The DisplayPort Alt Mode on the USB-C port allows you to connect a laptop to display an image from it, but it doesn't deliver enough power to charge your laptop at the same time. If you prefer another QD-OLED that delivers more power over USB-C, look into the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG instead.
The bandwidth of the USB-C port depends on which settings you use. The Type-C Compatibility improves compatibility with mobile devices, and turning it on limits the refresh rate to 60Hz. Besides that, using USB 3.2 Support limits the refresh rate to 240Hz.
Connection | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.1 | USB-C (M1) | USB-C (M2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Max Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 360Hz | 240Hz | 360Hz |
VRR Range | N/A | 48-360Hz | 48-240Hz | 48-360Hz |
HDR | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
The Gigabyte FO27Q3 works well with macOS, but there are some oddities. When connecting over HDMI, the default resolution is 1080p, which macOS then upscales to 4k, and the monitor downscales to 1440p. Because of this, the max refresh rate is limited to 60Hz with an M1 Mac and 120Hz with an M2 Mac unless you select '1440p (Low Resolution)' from the list of resolutions. Doing this results in worse text and image clarity, though, so only do this if you prefer having a high refresh rate over the sharpest possible text clarity. However, this doesn't happen over USB-C, as the default resolution is 1440p. Besides that, everything works as expected, and if you're using a MacBook with a USB-C connection, you can continue working on the monitor with the lid closed, which you can't do over HDMI. Windows also return to the original position when reopening the lid with a USB-C or HDMI 2.1 connection, but not with HDMI 2.0.
The Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 has a ton of extra features, including:
Like most OLED displays, there are also a few settings to help reduce the risk of burn-in, which you can find in the OLED Care section of the OSD. Gigabyte also offers a three-year warranty, including against burn-in, although that may vary between regions.
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.
I was about to buy the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 from Amazon when I noticed the dreaded: Frequently returned See product details and customer reviews I spent days trying to understand what the issue is but I haven’t found anything from the customer reviews/product details. When I separate the reviews based on the FO27Q3 alone (as they lump up all the reviews into a single portal only separated by individual make/model) I don’t get anything out of the ordinary. The only issue I found were reddit posts: -No DSC toggle (but none in this segment have it, right?) -OLED Care doesn’t work after 4 hours use and put into standby mode. “Aorus fo27q3 impressions” -Test Mode Bug after cleaning bricks the monitor to only show red, blue, green, blac and white screen “Gigabyte Aorus FO27Q3 Test Mode Issue”
- Convoluted procedure to register the product. Not only do you need a serial number but a four digit code which is normally not found on the monitor. Sometimes it’s found on a label on the side of the box itself. It appears that some of the monitors may have been shipped without this code number. But nothing concrete. These appear to be isolated cases. But nothing specific that would address why the monitor has a “Frequent returned” label from amazon. Could you shed some light on the subject? In particular the Test Mode Bug that some are complaining about after cleaning. It’s not clear what firmware they are on though.
Since they released the F5 update HDR EOTF tracking became worse. It looks really bad.
I was about to buy the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 from Amazon when I noticed the dreaded:
Frequently returned See product details and customer reviews
I spent days trying to understand what the issue is but I haven’t found anything from the customer reviews/product details. When I separate the reviews based on the FO27Q3 alone (as they lump up all the reviews into a single portal only separated by individual make/model) I don’t get anything out of the ordinary. The only issue I found were reddit posts: -No DSC toggle (but none in this segment have it, right?)
-OLED Care doesn’t work after 4 hours use and put into standby mode. “Aorus fo27q3 impressions”
-Test Mode Bug after cleaning bricks the monitor to only show red, blue, green, blac and white screen “Gigabyte Aorus FO27Q3 Test Mode Issue”
But nothing concrete. These appear to be isolated cases. But nothing specific that would address why the monitor has a “Frequent returned” label from amazon. Could you shed some light on the subject? In particular the Test Mode Bug that some are complaining about after cleaning. It’s not clear what firmware they are on though.
Is there any difference between it and the Mo27q2 other than 360hz?
Hi, we haven’t tested the FO27Q2, so we can’t say for sure how they differ in terms of performance other than the difference in refresh rate. That said, we’d expect it has fantastic image quality and motion handling like other OLEDs.
Is there any difference between it and the Mo27q2 other than 360hz?
Hi! I bought the FO27Q3 a few months back and was expecting to be WOWED since everyone’s raving about OLED’s superiority over LCD in terms of colour vividness, vibrancy, higher brightness, much better HDR performance etc etc. I was utterly disappointed. Yes, I do notice better overall picture quality, but the improvement over my previous budget gaming IPS monitor is SLIGHT and nowhere near WOW levels. I am using the latest firmware (F05) and default sRGB mode with none of the gaming features enabled. I downloaded and installed the calibrated ICC profile from this review and didn’t notice any difference. I am so preoccupied trying to figure out how to improve my monitor’s picture quality in SDR mode, I couldn’t be bothered now to set up and turn on HDR (which is still a crappy implementation in Windows 11 24H2). Right now I am regretting coughing out 1000 SGD of my hard-earned money on a supposedly state-of-the-art piece of tech that looks inferior to a Samsung ViewFinity S6 monitor that is 50% cheaper. Can anyone kindly tell me what I can do before I decide to sell my underwhelming unit and go back to good old trusty IPS LCD?
Somethings wrong either with your monitor or you if you can’t notice how vastly superior OLED is over cheap LCD.
We’ve just released a new video that mentions the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 here.
Hi! I bought the FO27Q3 a few months back and was expecting to be WOWED since everyone’s raving about OLED’s superiority over LCD in terms of colour vividness, vibrancy, higher brightness, much better HDR performance etc etc. I was utterly disappointed. Yes, I do notice better overall picture quality, but the improvement over my previous budget gaming IPS monitor is SLIGHT and nowhere near WOW levels. I am using the latest firmware (F05) and default sRGB mode with none of the gaming features enabled. I downloaded and installed the calibrated ICC profile from this review and didn’t notice any difference. I am so preoccupied trying to figure out how to improve my monitor’s picture quality in SDR mode, I couldn’t be bothered now to set up and turn on HDR (which is still a crappy implementation in Windows 11 24H2). Right now I am regretting coughing out 1000 SGD of my hard-earned money on a supposedly state-of-the-art piece of tech that looks inferior to a Samsung ViewFinity S6 monitor that is 50% cheaper. Can anyone kindly tell me what I can do before I decide to sell my underwhelming unit and go back to good old trusty IPS LCD?
Hi, if you’re using the sRGB mode, this might explain why you’re not seeing the vivid colors you expected. The sRGB mode clamps colors to the sRGB gamut. This makes it more accurate for viewing sRGB content, but it also means the monitor’s not showing as wide a range of colors as possible. Unless you’re editing content in the sRGB space, you may prefer one of the other modes that lets you see the full range of colors your monitor can display.
Also, we don’t recommend using our ICC profile with your monitor, as every unit requires different calibration values.
Hi!
I bought the FO27Q3 a few months back and was expecting to be WOWED since everyone’s raving about OLED’s superiority over LCD in terms of colour vividness, vibrancy, higher brightness, much better HDR performance etc etc. I was utterly disappointed. Yes, I do notice better overall picture quality, but the improvement over my previous budget gaming IPS monitor is SLIGHT and nowhere near WOW levels. I am using the latest firmware (F05) and default sRGB mode with none of the gaming features enabled. I downloaded and installed the calibrated ICC profile from this review and didn’t notice any difference. I am so preoccupied trying to figure out how to improve my monitor’s picture quality in SDR mode, I couldn’t be bothered now to set up and turn on HDR (which is still a crappy implementation in Windows 11 24H2). Right now I am regretting coughing out 1000 SGD of my hard-earned money on a supposedly state-of-the-art piece of tech that looks inferior to a Samsung ViewFinity S6 monitor that is 50% cheaper. Can anyone kindly tell me what I can do before I decide to sell my underwhelming unit and go back to good old trusty IPS LCD?