There are a few advantages to getting a 1440p monitor for gaming. They strike a balance between having good enough image quality without being too taxing on your graphics card, allowing you to reach high frame rates. These monitors are available in a wide range of refresh rates, even up to 480Hz, so they're great for almost any type of gamer, and even current-gen gaming consoles, like the PS5, PS5 Pro, and Xbox Series X|S, support 1440p signals.
When looking for a 1440p gaming monitor, there are a few things to consider, which we test for as part of our extensive testing on every monitor. Its response time is important for sharp motion handling, and which VRR format it supports ensures compatibility with your graphics card, but most monitors work with any type of graphics card. Low input lag also produces a responsive feel, but most monitors have low input lag anyway. The majority of 1440p monitors are available with a 27- or 32-inch screen, but choosing the right size is a personal preference.
We've bought and tested more than 345 monitors, and below are our recommendations for the best gaming monitors with a 1440p resolution. Also, see our recommendations for the best 1440p 144Hz monitors, the best 1440p monitors, and if you prefer a higher resolution, the best 4k gaming monitors. For more than just a monitor, check out the best gaming laptops and the best gaming headsets.
The best 1440p gaming monitor we've tested is the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It combines exceptional gaming performance with outstanding picture quality, making it ideal for gamers who crave graphically intense games at high frame rates. Its 360Hz refresh rate provides a smooth and responsive gaming feel, and thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, you can reach that refresh rate over HDMI, as well as over DisplayPort. It also has a near-instantaneous response time, so fast-moving objects are crisp.
It features a QD-OLED panel that provides a near-infinite contrast ratio, and it displays deep blacks in dark rooms with no blooming around bright objects. Colors are also bright and vivid, resulting in realistic images for outstanding picture quality. It even has a few useful features, like a KVM switch, making it easy to switch between different sources. You can also check out the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27ACDNG if you want a monitor with similar features; it sometimes costs less, but it isn't available at as many retailers as the MSI.
If the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED is out of your price range, check out the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG, which tends to cost less. It has a lower 240Hz refresh rate, so it's not quite as smooth and responsive as the MSI, but the refresh rate is still high enough, even for competitive PC gamers. Besides that, it offers the same near-instantaneous response time, so motion is sharp, but unlike the MSI, it lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take advantage of modern graphics cards and consoles.
One difference with the MSI is that because it's not a QD-OLED, colors aren't as vivid, but that's the trade-off for getting something cheaper. It still displays perfect blacks thanks to its WOLED panel and gets brighter than most OLEDs, so it's great to use in well-lit rooms, and highlights pop in HDR. Unlike other WOLEDs, it also has a glossy screen coating that makes the image clearer than on competing monitors with a matte coating, and it reduces glare well in most bright rooms.
If you're on a budget, you can get some budget-friendly 1440p monitors, like the AOC Q27G3XMN. It has a lower 180Hz refresh rate than the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG, and while it doesn't have the same outstanding picture quality with perfect blacks as the ASUS either, its picture quality is still better than most entry-level monitors. This is because it has Mini LED backlighting with a good local dimming feature that helps it display deep blacks next to bright highlights, with minimal blooming around bright objects. It even gets brighter than the ASUS, making it better to use in a bright room.
Although it doesn't have the same sharp motion as the ASUS either, it still has a fast enough response time to ensure there isn't much blur trail behind fast-moving objects. However, its response time is slower with some transitions, leading to smearing with dark objects. While it's also a good choice for console gaming, it can't take full advantage of the PS5 or Xbox Series X|S due to the lack of HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
The Sony INZONE M10S is a top-of-the-line 1440p gaming monitor with a 480Hz refresh rate. This makes it a better choice for competitive gaming than the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. The Sony is something to consider if you want such a high refresh rate, but it tends to cost more than the MSI, and has worse picture quality.
See our reviewThe LG 27GS95QE-B is a competitor to the ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG with nearly the same specs. It performs similarly in terms of gaming, but it doesn't get as bright as the ASUS. It's worth considering if you can find it for less.
See our reviewThe Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 is a high-end monitor that competes with the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. It performs similarly and has many of the same features, so it may be worth getting if you can find it for less, but it's also harder to find at times.
See our reviewThe MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED is a premium ultrawide 1440p gaming monitor that's worth considering if you want a wider screen than the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED. However, it has a lower 240Hz refresh rate, and its ultrawide screen may not be for everyone.
See our reviewMar 27, 2025: We removed the LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B because it's hard to find. We also replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP with the Sony INZONE M10S in the Notable Mentions.
Feb 19, 2025: We introduced a new format to the article and updated the text to reflect these changes. Additionally, we removed the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM and the LG 27GR83Q-B, as they don't provide as much value as the AOC Q27G3XMN. We also removed the ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS as a Notable Mention.
Dec 11, 2024: We replaced the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 with the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED because the MSI is easier to find and for consistency with other recommendations. We also added the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM as the 'Best Mid-Range Monitor' and renamed the LG 27GR83Q-B to the 'Best Lower Mid-Range Monitor' to give another option. In the Notable Mentions, we removed the Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60 and the Gigabyte M27Q X and added the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP, ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS, MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED, and the FO27Q3 based on the changes to the article.
Sep 18, 2024: We replaced the Dell Alienware AW2725DF and the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx with the Gigabyte AORUS FO27Q3 and the AOC Q27G3XMN for consistency with other recommendations and because the Gigabyte and AOC are back in stock. We also replaced the LG 27GS95QE-B with the brighter ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27AQDMG. Lastly, we updated the Notable Mentions by replacing the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF, LG 27GR95QE-B, and the Gigabyte GS27QC with the 27GS95QE-B, Samsung Odyssey OLED G6/G60SD S27DG60, ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM, and Gigabyte M27Q X.
Jul 02, 2024: Replaced the AOC Q27G3XMN with the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx as the AOC is hard to find now, and renamed the category to 'Best Budget Monitor.' Renamed the Dell G2724D to the 'Best Cheap Monitor.' Replaced the ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM with the Gigabyte GS27QC in the Notable Mentions based on changes in the recommendation.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best 1440p gaming monitors currently available. They're adapted to be valid for most people. The rating is based on our review, factoring in price and feedback from our visitors.
If you'd prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our 1440p monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.
What do you think of our picks? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying recommendation from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.
$3,299 S90D vs $2,499 S85D in 83 in which would be the better buy since they are both WOLED tvs. Or should I just get the 85 in QN90D $2,299 or 83 in LG B4 $2,499. I have the HW-Q990D soundbar with the 77 in S90D I just would like a bigger screen like 83 or 85 in. I am 11 feet from tv in light controlled living room. I will just watch movies, tv shows, news a little, and no gaming..I am still in the return window from best buy. I don’t know what to do. I have the 5 year Geek squad warranty on the S90D for burn in so not to worried about that. I just want a theater like experience in the living room.
Hello! Help with personalized buying advice is something our experts offer only via our [insider forums](https://www.rtings.com/forums/insider-advice. We do have lots of self-service tools and recommendation articles that should be helpful as well though!
$3,299 S90D vs $2,499 S85D in 83 in which would be the better buy since they are both WOLED tvs. Or should I just get the 85 in QN90D $2,299 or 83 in LG B4 $2,499. I have the HW-Q990D soundbar with the 77 in S90D I just would like a bigger screen like 83 or 85 in. I am 11 feet from tv in light controlled living room. I will just watch movies, tv shows, news a little, and no gaming..I am still in the return window from best buy. I don’t know what to do. I have the 5 year Geek squad warranty on the S90D for burn in so not to worried about that. I just want a theater like experience in the living room.