The 5 Best Curved Gaming Monitors - Spring 2025

The best curved gaming monitor we've tested is the Dell Alienware AW3225QF. It's a premium display that's outstanding for gaming. It has a 240Hz refresh rate and a near-instantaneous response time, meaning there's almost no blur trail behind fast-moving objects. It also supports all common types of VRR, including FreeSync, HDMI Forum VRR, and G-SYNC compatibility, to reduce screen tearing. Its high 4k resolution delivers sharp images, and the screen's 1700R curve helps provide a more immersive feel.

On top of its outstanding gaming performance, it even delivers exceptional picture quality. It uses a QD-OLED panel that displays perfect black levels in dark rooms and offers a wide range of colors, making highlights pop and colors look vivid. OLEDs aren't perfect, though, as they risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time. It isn't an issue if you play different games, but if that concerns you, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 is another 4k, 240Hz curved monitor. It uses Mini LED backlighting and doesn't risk burn-in, but it doesn't display the same deep blacks as the Dell.

While 4k, 240Hz displays like the Dell Alienware AW3225QF provide the most detailed image, they cost more and require a powerful gaming setup to take advantage of them, especially at high refresh rates. If you prefer saving money or don't have a graphics card that can take full advantage of the AW3225QF, consider the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF instead. It's different from the AW3225QF because it has an ultrawide screen that's useful for atmospheric games, but it doesn't deliver the same detailed images due to its lower 1440p resolution.

Besides those differences, it still offers outstanding picture quality and gaming performance, as it has a QD-OLED panel like the AW3225QF. It has a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion and displays deep blacks without any blooming around bright objects. Although it has a lower 165Hz refresh rate than the AW3225QF, it's still good enough for most gamers. That said, if you want an even higher 240Hz refresh rate, the LG 34GS95QE-B is another great OLED ultrawide monitor with outstanding motion handling, but colors aren't as vivid as on the AW3423DWF.

If you find the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF too much out of your price range, consider getting a mid-range option like the Samsung Odyssey G65D S32BG65D. It's a Best Buy-exclusive model, or you can get the Samsung Odyssey G6 S32BG652 at other retailers, as it performs the same. It's different from the Dell because it isn't an ultrawide, and its 32-inch, 240Hz screen makes it more of a cheaper alternative to the Dell Alienware AW3225QF. However, it has worse picture quality than both Dell monitors as it doesn't have an OLED display, and its colors aren't as vivid. Additionally, it has terrible local dimming, as there's distracting blooming.

However, it's still great for gaming. While its motion handling isn't as good as the Dells' above, fast-moving objects still look fairly crisp, though there's a bit of smearing. It also has a high refresh rate with very low input lag, so it feels very responsive. On top of that, it's a great choice if you want to use it in a well-lit room, as it gets bright enough to fight glare, plus small highlights pop in HDR.

If you want a budget-friendly curved monitor, look into the Dell S3422DWG. It's different from the Samsung Odyssey G65D S32BG65D because it has an ultrawide format with a 34-inch screen, so it offers a more immersive gaming experience for playing atmospheric games. It also offers decent gaming performance, and the 1800R curve helps bring the edges closer to your field of vision.

Regarding gaming features, it has a lower 144Hz refresh rate than the Samsung, with FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. While it has visible smearing with fast-moving objects, the overall response time is still decent enough for gaming. It also has a backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur, but it's only available in a limited refresh rate range. Like the Samsung, it gets fairly bright in HDR, and though highlights don't pop as much, it fights glare well in bright rooms.

If you want something cheap, it's better to look for 16:9 monitors instead of more costly ultrawide monitors. The Gigabyte GS27QC is a decent option as it has a 1440p resolution like the Dell S3422DWG, but you don't get the same immersive gaming experience because there's less horizontal screen space. Luckily, it has a slightly higher 170Hz max refresh rate and the same FreeSync VRR support with G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing.

The main advantage of getting this over other entry-level curved gaming monitors is its decent gaming performance with an okay response time at its max refresh rate. While there's smearing and blur with fast-moving objects, this is normal for most cheap curved monitors and is still fine for gaming. There are some downsides to the monitor, though, as it doesn't get very bright, so if you want a budget-friendly option that does, then consider the Dell S2722DGM, but it tends to cost a bit more.