Curved gaming monitors are a great choice if you sit close to the screen and find that the edges on flat monitors often look washed out. A key benefit of having a curved monitor is that the entire screen is closer to your field of vision, so you see a more consistent image across the display, especially on monitors with narrow viewing angles. They can also help provide an immersive gaming experience.
The radius of a curved display tells you how aggressive the curvature is, with a lower number representing a more aggressive curve; 800R is more aggressive than 1700R, but it may take some time to get used to an aggressive screen. Not all curved gaming monitors are created equal, as they're available in different aspect ratios and sizes, with many of them being ultrawide displays. If you want the best gaming experience when looking for a curved monitor, it's important to consider its gaming performance and features, like its refresh rate, response time, and input lag, but most monitors have low input lag anyway.
We've bought and tested more than 330 monitors, and below are our picks for the best curved gaming monitors. For more options, see our recommendations for the best curved monitors, the best 34-49 inch monitors, and the best ultrawide gaming monitors.
The best curved gaming monitor we've tested is the Dell Alienware AW3225QF. It's a premium display that's outstanding for gaming, as it has a 240Hz refresh rate. It has a near-instantaneous response time, meaning there's almost no blur trail behind fast-moving objects. It also supports all common types of VRR, including FreeSync, HDMI Forum VRR, and G-SYNC compatibility, to reduce screen tearing. Its high 4k resolution delivers sharp images, and the screen's 1700R curve helps provide a more immersive feel.
On top of its outstanding gaming performance, it even delivers exceptional picture quality. It uses a QD-OLED panel that displays perfect black levels in dark rooms and offers a wide range of colors, making highlights pop and colors look vivid. OLEDs aren't perfect, though, as they risk burn-in with constant exposure to the same static elements over time. If that concerns you, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 is another 4k, 240Hz curved monitor that uses Mini LED backlighting and doesn't risk burn-in, but it doesn't display the same deep blacks as the Dell.
While 4k displays like the Dell Alienware AW3225QF provide the most detailed image, they cost more and require a powerful gaming setup to take advantage of them, especially at high refresh rates. If you prefer saving money or don't have a graphics card that can take full advantage of the AW3225QF, consider the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF instead. It's different from the AW3225QF because it has an ultrawide screen that's useful for atmospheric games, but it doesn't deliver the same detailed images due to its lower 1440p resolution.
Besides those differences, it still offers outstanding picture quality and gaming performance, as it has a QD-OLED panel like the AW3225QF. It has a near-instantaneous response time for sharp motion and displays deep blacks without any blooming around bright objects. Although it has a lower 165Hz refresh rate than the AW3225QF, it's still good enough for most gamers. That said, if you want an even higher 240Hz refresh rate, the LG 34GS95QE-B is another great OLED ultrawide monitor with outstanding motion handling, but colors aren't as vivid as on the AW3225QF.
If you find the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF too much out of your price range, consider getting a mid-range option like the Gigabyte M32UC. It's different from the Dell because it isn't an ultrawide and its 4k, 32-inch screen makes it more of a cheaper alternative to the Dell Alienware AW3225QF. However, it has worse picture quality than both Dell monitors as it doesn't have an OLED display or even a local dimming feature, so blacks look gray in dark rooms, and colors aren't as vivid. Another downside is that it has worse motion handling, with more smearing with fast-moving objects, but its response time is still fast enough for most gamers.
On the plus side, it has a backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur, and it works at the same time as VRR, which not all monitors can do. Another advantage of this monitor over the AW3423DWF is its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, so it can fully take advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S. In addition to being great for console gaming, it also has a 160Hz refresh rate that's great for PC gaming.
If you want a budget-friendly curved monitor, look into the Dell S3422DWG. It's different from the Gigabyte M32UC because it has an ultrawide format with a 34-inch screen and a lower 3440x1440 resolution, so images are less detailed. It doesn't offer HDMI 2.1 bandwidth to take full advantage of consoles, either. That said, it still offers decent gaming performance, and the 1800R curve helps bring the edges closer to your field of vision.
Regarding gaming features, it has a native 144Hz refresh rate with FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing. While it has visible smearing with fast-moving objects, the overall response time is still decent enough for gaming. It also has a backlight strobing feature to reduce persistence blur, but unlike the Gigabyte, it doesn't work simultaneously with VRR and is only available in a limited refresh rate range. One advantage of this monitor over the Gigabyte is that it gets brighter in HDR.
If you want something cheap, it's better to look for 16:9 monitors instead of more costly ultrawide monitors. The Gigabyte GS27QC is a great option as it has a 1440p resolution like the Dell S3422DWG, but you don't get the same immersive gaming experience because there's less horizontal screen space. Luckily, it has a slightly higher 170Hz max refresh rate and the same FreeSync VRR support with G-SYNC compatibility to reduce screen tearing.
The main advantage of getting this over other entry-level curved gaming monitors is its decent gaming performance with an okay response time at its max refresh rate. While there's smearing and blur with fast-moving objects, this is normal for most cheap monitors and is still fine for gaming. There are some downsides to the monitor, though, as it doesn't get very bright, so if you want a budget-friendly option that does, then consider the Dell S2722DGM, but it tends to cost a bit more.
Sep 26, 2024: We verified that the recommended monitors are still available to purchase and refreshed the text throughout.
Jul 03, 2024: Renamed the Dell S3422DWG to 'Best Budget' and the Gigabyte GS27QC to 'Best Cheap' to better reflect their prices and for consistency with other recommendations.
May 15, 2024: Made sure that the monitors are still available and are consistent with other recommendations. Updated text for clarity throughout.
Mar 22, 2024: Replaced the MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED with the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF because the MSI is hard to find.
Feb 28, 2024: Replaced the Dell Alienware AW3423DW with the Dell Alienware AW3225QF as the 'Best Curved Gaming Monitor,' as it has better performance. Replaced the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 with the MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED as the 'Best Upper Mid-Range,' as it has better performance. Added the Dell Alienware AW3423DW, the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF, and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 as Notable Mentions.
Our recommendations are based on what we think are the best gaming monitors with a curved screen currently available. They are adapted to be valid for most people in each price range. Rating is based on our review, factoring in price, and feedback from our visitors.
If you would prefer to make your own decision, here is the list of all of our curved monitor reviews. Be careful not to get too caught up in the details. Most monitors are good enough to please most people, and the things we fault monitors on are often not noticeable unless you really look for them.