Our accelerated longevity test has been running for almost two years now, and from full-on panel failures to image retention and LCD degradation, we've already encountered some interesting results. You can learn more about our latest results with our RTINGS.com R&D videos or our ten-month update article.
At the bottom of this page, you can see the raw data for all TVs on this test below by selecting the month and uniformity slide you'd like to see. If you want to learn more about how we created this test, check out our first article here.
The goal of RTINGS.com's ongoing 100 TV longevity test is to push TVs to the limits of their durability to examine failure points as they happen. One clear trend we've observed and investigated is that thin, edge-lit LCD TVs fail prematurely compared to LCD TVs with other backlighting technology.
The results of this investigation are unequivocal: edge-lit TVs are inherently prone to significant durability issues, including warped reflector sheets, cracked light guide plates, and burnt-out LEDs due to concentrated heat. These problems manifest after prolonged use at maximum brightness, posing a significant risk to their long-term reliability. You can learn more about this investigation in the video posted above or in our written article here.
This analysis, corroborated by real-world observations, highlights a crucial consideration for consumers and the industry. As manufacturers continue to push for thinner designs, addressing these durability concerns is imperative to ensure consumer satisfaction and trust. For consumers in the market for an LCD TV to whom the durability of their purchase is important, we recommend prioritizing models with better heat distribution, such as direct-lit or FALD TVs, for improved longevity and performance.
We've now hit the two-year mark for most TVs on the longevity test! Not much has changed over the last two months. Backlight issues continue to worsen for a few LED TVs, like the Hisense H8G, LG QNED80 2022, Samsung Q60B QLED, and the Vizio M6 Series Quantum 2021. All four of these are so bad that most consumers would have definitely replaced them, as they're unwatchable at this point, but we're keeping them running until they completely break.
TV | Month 20 | Month 22 | Month 24 |
---|---|---|---|
Hisense H8G | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
LG QNED80 2022 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Samsung Q60B | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Vizio M6 Series Quantum 2021 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
As for the OLEDs on this test, well, they're all pretty bad at this point. The burn-in continues to worsen on all of them, and as you can see in the Vizio OLED above, it's pretty bad, with the CNN "Breaking News" banner clearly visible, as well as the ghosts of the talking heads. This TV is showing the worst burn-in of all of them, but the banner at the bottom is noticeable with real content on all OLEDs at this point, even on the LG G3 and the Samsung S95C, both of which were added to our test about six months later than the other models.
Well, just about a month after our last update, three more TVs appear to have failed. The Hisense A6H still powers on but appears to have suffered a backlight failure. On the other hand, the Hisense A6G and Toshiba C350 seem to have completely failed and no longer power on. We're in the early stages of investigating these failures, so we'll update the original reviews once we've confirmed the failure.
In other news, the longevity test will be shutting down for two weeks starting Friday, December 20th. Our offices are shutting down for the holidays, so we don't want anything failing when we're not there to watch. We'll be back on January 6th, 2025, to start the last year of this iteration of the test.
The 22-month results have been updated to each individual review page. After 22 months, we're starting to enter the right side of the bathtub failure curve. Over the last two months, the number of partial failures has increased drastically, with 4 new TVs showing significant backlight failures, including one new TV that completely failed, the Hisense A6H. The Hisense H8G continues to decline, with most of the backlight zones now completely off. The LG NANO75 2022 is starting to fail, with one dark spot near the center, and the LG QNED80 2022's backlight is failing in the center (shown above). The Vizio M6 Series Quantum 2021 is also starting to fail, and the top third of its backlight has now failed.
As for the test itself, although we're approaching the end of our initial 2-year test run, we've decided to keep it running into 2025. The rate of TV failures is increasing rapidly, and we want to learn more about this end of the curve. This trend is expected to continue in the coming months, with more and more TVs failing and developing increasingly bad uniformity issues.
The 20-month results have been updated to each individual review page. Not much has changed this month, but the Hisense H8G continues to degrade, with more dead spots in the backlight. Unfortunately, our attempts to repair the Sony X800H and the Insignia F50 QLED have failed, and we've permanently removed these two TVs from the longevity test. We've also had a new failure, as the backlight on the Amazon Fire TV 4-Series has failed.
The backlight on the Insignia F50 QLED has completely failed. The TV powers on, but there's no light from the backlight at all. We'll dismantle the TV to try to determine if it can be fixed, but for now, it's been removed from the test. The Sony X800H has also suffered a similar fate and has been removed from the test.
We published new results of an investigative study on the long-term durability of TVs. As part of our two-year test, which has so far subjected 100 TVs to over 10,000 hours of accelerated testing, we found that edge-lit TVs have significant durability issues. These issues range from warped reflector sheets and cracked light guide plates to completely burnt-out LEDs. Over 64% of the edge-lit LCD TVs on our long-term test show significant uniformity issues, compared to just 20% of the full-array and direct-lit TVs on the test. You can read the full results of our investigation here. The study is still ongoing, and we expect to see even more issues pop up with the other edge-lit TVs on the test over the coming months. We also posted a new video covering the findings of our edge-lit TV investigation.
We've uploaded the 18-month results to each review. There's very little that's new to report this month; most of the LED TVs on the test are continuing to degrade (especially edge-lit models, more on that in a few days!). All OLED TVs are now showing signs of permanent burn-in. The Samsung S95C OLED remains the most resilient of the OLED models, showing only slight signs of burn-in. The Samsung Q60B QLED is now showing signs of pinching along the bottom edge, and the dark spots on the Hisense H8G cover a significant portion of the screen now. The Vizio OLED 2020 continues to be the worst OLED on the test, with the words "Breaking News" and "2024" now clearly visible. As for the three monitors on this test, there's very little change over the last update. The CNN news banner is faintly visible on all three, but it's still relatively minor and not really noticeable with real content.
We've completed our failure investigation into the Samsung AU8000, Samsung The Frame 2022, and the Hisense U8H. Unfortunately, we had to permanently remove all three of those TVs from the longevity test, as the AU8000 can't be fixed, and the Frame 2022 and U8H broke during the investigation and are unusable. We're wrapping up a nearly two-month investigation into the uniformity issues these and other edge-lit TVs developed. Look for the final results of that investigation soon.
The 16-month results have been uploaded to each individual review. The Samsung AU8000 is still broken and has been temporarily removed from the test. We're monitoring several issues with almost all TVs, including uniformity issues and significant backlight failures on some LCD models. The Hisense U8H has lost nearly 70% of its brightness since the beginning, and the Hisense H8G has developed dark spots across the screen over the last two months. There's no significant change to the OLEDs; the Samsung S95C OLED remains surprisingly resilient, with no noticeable signs of burn-in, but every other OLED is showing some image retention.
The backlight on the Samsung AU8000 has failed. We don't know yet if we can repair it, but we're looking into it to determine the cause of the failure and if we can fix it or not.
The results after 14 months have been posted to each review, and we've updated the table below. Not much has changed over the last two months, with no new full failures. A number of LED TVs are continuing to show noticeable degradation. The Samsung Q900TS 8k QLED has a more noticeable dark spot along the bottom middle of the screen, and the backlight of the Samsung AU8000 is continuing to fail. There's a pinched spot on the bottom of the LG QNED80 2022; this appears to be physical damage on the outside of the TV, not a failure of the panel. The backlight on the Hisense U8H (above) is failing rapidly; at this point, it's pretty much unusable. As for the OLEDs, well, they're continuing to experience burn-in, especially the older models like the Sony A80J OLED and the LG CX OLED, and the Vizio OLED 2020 is nearly unusable at this point.
We've posted our latest video, covering the 1-year results with a focus on LCD models and future failures. Check it out here!
We've posted the 1-year results to each review and updated the table below. Most of the TVs on this test have now accumulated 7,200 hours of runtime. Not much has changed since our last update. The same LCD TVs continue to degrade, and some are so bad that they're unwatchable. The Hisense U8H, which started to show some uniformity issues in our last update, is now completely blue in the center of the screen, and the Samsung TU8000 looks terrible. Over a dozen LCD TVs are now showing signs of image retention, but only on a 5% gray slide (TCL 6 Series/R646 2021 QLED, LG NANO75 2022, Samsung Q60B QLED). This isn't noticeable with our published slides or real content. This might be caused by some form of TFT voltage shift, similar to temporary image retention on an OLED, but LCD TVs lack the compensation mechanism necessary to remove it. We'll keep monitoring this issue to see if it worsens.
As for the plethora of OLED TVs on this test, most are also showing signs of burn-in now. Interestingly, the Samsung S95C OLED, which uses a new real-time compensation algorithm, looks significantly better than the Samsung S95B OLED after the same number of months. As for the three monitors, the CNN breaking news bar is barely visible on all three of them, but only on test slides; it's not noticeable with real content.
Below this, you can see a table with the uniformity slides from our bimonthly updates and the graphs showing the brightness change over time. The latest slides will always be available here as we process and upload new results.
Model | Brightness Graph | Uniformity |
---|---|---|
Dell Alienware AW3423DWF | ![]() | |
LG 27GR95QE-B | ![]() | |
Samsung Odyssey OLED G85SB S34BG85 | ![]() |
What do you think of our article? Let us know below.
Want to learn more? Check out our complete list of articles and tests on the R&D page.
Thanks Adam! Does RTINGS have ranking for people that watch A LOT of older programing, non 4k, HD? We want an LED that does really well upscaling I guess because we stream (via USB stick) tons of old TV
Processing is a tricky thing to objectively measure, so we don’t have a proper ranking yet, but you can look at the Upscaling: Sharpness Processing and Low Quality Content Smoothing tests. Sony TVs are widely praised as having the best processing, but there’s only so much they can do. The quality of your content will make a huge difference here, so shows that have been rereleased on Blu ray will look significantly better than VHS transfers or DVDs.
Yes, running at max brightness will impact longevity. This will degrade the LEDs quicker but it’ll also generate more heat, which can lead to premature failure of other components as well. LED or QLED doesn’t really make a difference here, as both types of display still use LEDs to light up the image. The specific type of LED matters. Avoid TVs with edge-lit backlights, as these are more likely to fail early.
Thanks Adam! Does RTINGS have ranking for people that watch A LOT of older programing, non 4k, HD? We want an LED that does really well upscaling I guess because we stream (via USB stick) tons of old TV
Our LG 55" LED just got black screen at the 6 year mark. Back Light was always 93-95/100, does having the back light that high cut life span down a lot? We are in the market for new TV and on the fence with basis LED or QLED but longevity is a big thing for us
Yes, running at max brightness will impact longevity. This will degrade the LEDs quicker but it’ll also generate more heat, which can lead to premature failure of other components as well. LED or QLED doesn’t really make a difference here, as both types of display still use LEDs to light up the image. The specific type of LED matters. Avoid TVs with edge-lit backlights, as these are more likely to fail early.
Our LG 55" LED just got black screen at the 6 year mark. Back Light was always 93-95/100, does having the back light that high cut life span down a lot?
We are in the market for new TV and on the fence with basis LED or QLED but longevity is a big thing for us
Dear RTINGS.com Thank you for this incredible study. Please let me make a proposal. As heat is the most important factor leading to burn-in in OLED TVs, and burn-in pattern is not heterogenous, but it frequently impacts most on the lower third of the TV screen. Have you done an experiment with one of your new OLED TVs but including an active cooling system (like in a PC: fans, Liquid-cooling) in order to verify whether or not an active cooling system might improve the lifetime of the proper, perfect OLED TV image. If not, could you please consider such an option in your ongoing study? The result of this experiment would indicate whether a regular user (who could pay 2000 EUR for a perfect image on an OLED TV) could combat overheating in OLED TVs and extend the lifetime of the OLED TV image. Thank you
Hi tetshuo,
Thank you for your suggestion and for taking the time to share such an interesting idea with us!
You’re absolutely right that heat is a critical factor in OLED burn-in, and the idea of testing the impact of an active cooling system is intriguing. While we haven’t conducted such an experiment as part of our ongoing studies, we agree that it could provide valuable insights into how one could extend the longevity of OLED TVs and keep their performance more stable over time.
While we can’t make any promises, your suggestion is now on our radar, and we’ll definitely keep it in mind as we continue to refine and expand our testing. Exploring unconventional solutions like active cooling could open up new possibilities for our testing and help consumers make more informed decisions.
Thanks again for your thoughtful proposal! If you have any further ideas or feedback, feel free to reach out :)
Cheers,
Dear RTINGS.com Thank you for this incredible study. Please let me make a proposal. As heat is the most important factor leading to burn-in in OLED TVs, and burn-in pattern is not heterogenous, but it frequently impacts most on the lower third of the TV screen. Have you done an experiment with one of your new OLED TVs but including an active cooling system (like in a PC: fans, Liquid-cooling) in order to verify whether or not an active cooling system might improve the lifetime of the proper, perfect OLED TV image. If not, could you please consider such an option in your ongoing study? The result of this experiment would indicate whether a regular user (who could pay 2000 EUR for a perfect image on an OLED TV) could combat overheating in OLED TVs and extend the lifetime of the OLED TV image. Thank you
In its most recent text update in July, the S95c was noted as the most resilient OLED to burn-in. When looking at the photos, however, I do notice that the over-brightening from the compensation algorithm mentioned in last year’s 10-month update video has gotten significantly worse. Is this brightening not considered burn-in to the team, is it actually just image retention, or is that just considered less burn-in than any of the other OLEDs? Thanks!
It’s definitely burn-in, and the S95C is showing a roughly 20% decrease in brightness since the beginning, so I don’t think we can say it’s the most resilient, either. Samsung’s compensation algorithms are clearly dealing with it differently than the other TVs on this test, but it’s still permanent burn-in.
In its most recent text update in July, the S95c was noted as the most resilient OLED to burn-in. When looking at the photos, however, I do notice that the over-brightening from the compensation algorithm mentioned in last year’s 10-month update video has gotten significantly worse. Is this brightening not considered burn-in to the team, is it actually just image retention, or is that just considered less burn-in than any of the other OLEDs? Thanks!