Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Picture Quality
- Motion
- Inputs
- Features
- Comments
Gigabyte G27Q vs Gigabyte AORUS FO48U OLED
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Gigabyte G27Q
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U OLED
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated May 23, 2024 07:44 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v1.2
Updated May 15, 2024 02:30 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Max Refresh Rate144 Hz
Size27"
Pixel TypeIPS
Variable Refresh RateYes
HDR10Yes
Native Resolution2560 x 1440
Max Refresh Rate120 Hz
Size48"
Pixel TypeOLED
Variable Refresh RateYes
HDR10Yes
Native Resolution3840 x 2160
Variants
- G27Q (27")
- AORUS FO48U (48")
Our Verdict
Gigabyte G27Q
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U OLED
The Gigabyte AORUS FO48U OLED and the Gigabyte G27Q use very different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses. The FO48U uses an OLED panel, which has a nearly-instantaneous response time and can display deep, inky blacks with perfect uniformity. Unfortunately, the FO48U also has a risk of permanent burn-in. The G27Q uses an IPS panel, which has no risk of burn-in, but it's brighter in HDR, especially with very bright scenes.