Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
- Table of Contents
- Top
- Main Differences
- Design
- Picture Quality
- Motion
- Inputs
- Features
- Comments
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P vs MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED
Side-by-Side Comparison
Products
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED
Tested using Methodology v2.0.1
Updated Feb 28, 2025 08:49 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.comTested using Methodology v2.0.1
Updated Mar 05, 2025 02:08 PM
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
Max Refresh Rate240 Hz
Size32"
Pixel TypeQD-OLED
Native Resolution3840 x 2160
Max Refresh Rate240 Hz
Size32"
Pixel TypeQD-OLED
Native Resolution3840 x 2160
Variants
- AORUS FO32U2P (32")
- MPG 322URX QD-OLED (32")
Our Verdict
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED
The Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED are both 32-inch 4k 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitors. Both monitors have very similar performance and UHBR20 support, and for most people the better option is whichever one you can find cheaper. However, if you're gaming in a brighter room, the Gigabyte is a better option, as it gets brighter in SDR. However, the MSI is a better option if you're connecting a laptop that draws lots of power, as it delivers much more power over USB-C.