Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Style
    2. Accelerated Longevity Test
    3. Build Quality
    4. Ergonomics
    5. Stand
    6. Display
    7. Controls
    8. In The Box
  5. Picture Quality
    1. Contrast
    2. Local Dimming
    3. SDR Brightness
    4. HDR Brightness
    5. Horizontal Viewing Angle
    6. Vertical Viewing Angle
    7. Gray Uniformity
    8. Black Uniformity
    9. Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
    10. Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
    11. SDR Color Gamut
    12. HDR Color Gamut
    13. HDR Color Volume
    14. Text Clarity
    15. Reflections
    16. Gradient
    17. SDR Color Volume
  6. Motion
    1. Refresh Rate
    2. Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    3. VRR Motion Performance
    4. Refresh Rate Compliance
    5. Response Time @ 60Hz
    6. CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    7. Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    8. CAD @ 120Hz
    9. Response Time @ 120Hz
    10. CAD @ 60Hz
    11. Response Time @ 60Hz
    12. Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    13. VRR Flicker
    14. Image Flicker
  7. Inputs
    1. Input Lag
    2. Resolution
    3. PS5 Compatibility
    4. Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    5. Inputs Photos
    6. Video And Audio Ports
    7. USB
    8. macOS Compatibility
  8. Features
    1. Additional Features
    2. On-Screen Display (OSD)
  9. Comments

MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED vs Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240

Tested using Methodology v2.0.1

Updated Feb 19, 2025 04:47 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v1.2

Updated Nov 01, 2023 05:49 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED Picture
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 Picture

Variants

  • MEG 342C QD-OLED (34")
  • XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 (45")

Our Verdict

MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED

Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240

The MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED and the Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 are both fantastic OLED gaming monitors with a few differences. The MSI has a smaller screen, but because they have the same resolution, the Corsair has lower pixel density and worse image sharpness. The MSI also has a QD-OLED panel that gets brighter and delivers more vivid colors than the Corsair for an improved HDR experience. While they each have USB-C ports, the MSI delivers higher power delivery, making it easier to charge power-hungry devices. On the other hand, the Corsair has a higher 240Hz refresh rate and a bendable screen that lets you adjust its curve to your liking.

0