Tested using Methodology v2.0
Updated Nov 19, 2024 05:10 PM
Tested using Methodology v1.2
Updated Nov 01, 2023 05:49 PM
MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240
The MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED and the Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 are both fantastic OLED gaming monitors with a few differences. The MSI has a smaller screen, but because they have the same resolution, the Corsair has lower pixel density and worse image sharpness. The MSI also has a QD-OLED panel that gets brighter and delivers more vivid colors than the Corsair for an improved HDR experience. While they each have USB-C ports, the MSI delivers higher power delivery, making it easier to charge power-hungry devices. On the other hand, the Corsair has a higher 240Hz refresh rate and a bendable screen that lets you adjust its curve to your liking.
Notice: Two or more of the products selected have been tested with different test methodologies, so some of the results below aren't directly comparable. Learn how our test benches and scoring system work, and read more about the latest changes to our monitors test methodology.
MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240
Comments
MSI MEG 342C QD-OLED vs Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240: Main Discussion
What do you think of these products? Let us know below.
Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.