Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
  1. Table of Contents
  2. Top
  3. Main Differences
  4. Design
    1. Style
    2. Accelerated Longevity Test
    3. Build Quality
    4. Ergonomics
    5. Stand
    6. Display
    7. Controls
    8. In The Box
  5. Picture Quality
    1. Contrast
    2. Local Dimming
    3. SDR Brightness
    4. HDR Brightness
    5. Horizontal Viewing Angle
    6. Vertical Viewing Angle
    7. Gray Uniformity
    8. Black Uniformity
    9. Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
    10. Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
    11. SDR Color Gamut
    12. HDR Color Gamut
    13. HDR Color Volume
    14. Text Clarity
    15. Reflections
    16. Gradient
  6. Motion
    1. Refresh Rate
    2. Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    3. VRR Motion Performance
    4. Refresh Rate Compliance
    5. CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    6. Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    7. CAD @ 120Hz
    8. Response Time @ 120Hz
    9. CAD @ 60Hz
    10. Response Time @ 60Hz
    11. Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    12. VRR Flicker
    13. Image Flicker
  7. Inputs
    1. Input Lag
    2. Resolution
    3. PS5 Compatibility
    4. Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    5. Inputs Photos
    6. Video And Audio Ports
    7. USB
    8. macOS Compatibility
  8. Features
    1. Additional Features
    2. On-Screen Display (OSD)
  9. Comments

AOC Q27G3XMN vs Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx

Side-by-Side Comparison

Products

AOC Q27G3XMN
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx

Tested using Methodology v2.0.1

Updated Apr 08, 2025 05:37 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Tested using Methodology v2.0.1

Updated Mar 10, 2025 02:19 PM

SEE PRICE
Amazon.com
AOC Q27G3XMN Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Picture

Variants

  • Q27G3XMN (27")
  • Nitro XV275U P3biipx (27")

Our Verdict

AOC Q27G3XMN

Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx

The AOC Q27G3XMN and the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx are competing entry-level monitors with many of the same features. While they each have Mini LED local dimming, the AOC is just a bit better as it has less blooming. However, the Acer is the better choice if you need something for a well-lit room as it gets brighter. On the other hand, the AOC has an advantage for gaming thanks to its faster response time.

2 

Check Price

27"
Nitro XV275U P3biipx
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

Main Differences for
PC Gaming

Threshold 

0.10

PC Gaming 

8.2
7.8

VRR Motion Performance 
 

8.8
6.8

CAD @ 60Hz 
 

8.2
4.5

Refresh Rate Compliance 
 

8.5
7.5

Full Comparison

Design

Style 
 

Design Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Design Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Design Picture

Curved 
 

No
No

Curve Radius 
 

Not Curved
Not Curved
Show Text 

Accelerated Longevity Test 
 

Uniformity Pictures  

Longevity Graph  

Build Quality 
 

7.5
8.0

Build Quality Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Build Quality Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Build Quality Picture
Show Text 

Ergonomics 
 

9.2
9.7

Ergonomics Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Ergonomics Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Ergonomics Picture

Back Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Back Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Back Picture

Height Adjustment 
 

5.1" (12.9 cm)
5.7" (14.6 cm)

Min Height To Top Of Panel 
 

15.4" (39.2 cm)
17.0" (43.1 cm)

Tilt Range 
 

-20° to 5°
-25° to 5°

Rotate Portrait/Landscape 
 

Yes, Both Ways
Yes, Both Ways

Swivel Range 
 

-30° to 30°
-25° to 25°

Wall Mount 
 

VESA 100x100
VESA 75x75
Show Text 

Stand 
 

Stand Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Stand Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Stand Picture

Thickness Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Thickness Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Thickness Picture

Base Width 
 

19.1" (48.5 cm)
21.7" (55.2 cm)

Base Depth 
 

12.2" (31.0 cm)
10.6" (27.0 cm)

Thickness (With Display) 
 

9.2" (23.4 cm)
8.7" (22.2 cm)

Weight (With Display) 
 

15.8 lbs (7.2 kg)
13.8 lbs (6.3 kg)
Show Text 

Display 
 

Display Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Display Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Display Picture

Size 
 

27"
27"

Housing Width 
 

24.2" (61.4 cm)
24.2" (61.4 cm)

Housing Height 
 

14.3" (36.4 cm)
14.2" (36.0 cm)

Thickness (Without Stand) 
 

2.8" (7.2 cm)
3.1" (8.0 cm)

Weight (Without Stand) 
 

12.2 lbs (5.6 kg)
9.6 lbs (4.4 kg)

Borders Size (Bezels)  
 

0.3" (0.8 cm)
0.4" (0.9 cm)

Controls 
 

Controls Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Controls Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Controls Picture
Show Text 

In The Box 
 

In The Box Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN In The Box Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx In The Box Picture

Power Supply 
 

Internal
External Brick
Show Text 
Picture Quality

Contrast 
 

8.8
8.6

Checkerboard Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Checkerboard Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Checkerboard Picture

Native Contrast 
 

4,508 : 1
4,559 : 1

Contrast With Local Dimming 
 

9,613 : 1
4,720 : 1
Show Text 

Local Dimming 
 

7.5
6.0

Local Dimming Video  

Local Dimming 
 

Yes
Yes

Backlight 
 

Full-Array
Full-Array
Show Text 

SDR Brightness 
 

7.8
8.6

Real Scene 
 

327 cd/m²
580 cd/m²

Peak 2% Window 
 

270 cd/m²
588 cd/m²

Peak 10% Window 
 

332 cd/m²
588 cd/m²

Peak 25% Window 
 

359 cd/m²
586 cd/m²

Peak 50% Window 
 

373 cd/m²
583 cd/m²

Peak 100% Window 
 

382 cd/m²
581 cd/m²

Sustained 2% Window 
 

270 cd/m²
586 cd/m²

Sustained 10% Window 
 

332 cd/m²
586 cd/m²

Sustained 25% Window 
 

357 cd/m²
584 cd/m²

Sustained 50% Window 
 

371 cd/m²
582 cd/m²

Sustained 100% Window 
 

380 cd/m²
580 cd/m²

Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL) 
 

0.021
0.001

Minimum Brightness 
 

34 cd/m²
37 cd/m²
Show Text 

HDR Brightness 
 

8.7
9.1

EOTF  

AOC Q27G3XMN EOTF
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx EOTF

VESA DisplayHDR Certification 
 

DisplayHDR 1000
DisplayHDR 1000

Real Scene 
 

810 cd/m²
1,074 cd/m²

Peak 2% Window 
 

796 cd/m²
797 cd/m²

Peak 10% Window 
 

976 cd/m²
1,319 cd/m²

Peak 25% Window 
 

1,034 cd/m²
1,548 cd/m²

Peak 50% Window 
 

1,011 cd/m²
1,631 cd/m²

Peak 100% Window 
 

966 cd/m²
1,320 cd/m²

Sustained 2% Window 
 

790 cd/m²
792 cd/m²

Sustained 10% Window 
 

970 cd/m²
1,316 cd/m²

Sustained 25% Window 
 

1,018 cd/m²
1,543 cd/m²

Sustained 50% Window 
 

991 cd/m²
1,613 cd/m²

Sustained 100% Window 
 

949 cd/m²
1,109 cd/m²

Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL) 
 

0.013
0.036
Show Text 

Horizontal Viewing Angle 
 

5.2
6.0

Horizontal Viewing Angle Video  

Horizontal Chroma Graph  

AOC Q27G3XMN Horizontal Chroma Graph
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Horizontal Chroma Graph

Color Washout From Left 
 

27°
29°

Color Washout From Right 
 

25°
29°

Horizontal Hue Graph  

AOC Q27G3XMN Horizontal Hue Graph
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Horizontal Hue Graph

Color Shift From Left 
 

26°
57°

Color Shift From Right 
 

26°
65°

Horizontal Lightness Graph  

AOC Q27G3XMN Horizontal Lightness Graph
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Horizontal Lightness Graph

Brightness Loss From Left 
 

30°
32°

Brightness Loss From Right 
 

28°
32°

Black Level Raise From Left 
 

15°
16°

Black Level Raise From Right 
 

15°
17°

Gamma Shift From Left 
 

14°
15°

Gamma Shift From Right 
 

16°
18°
Show Text 

Vertical Viewing Angle 
 

4.8
5.8

Vertical Viewing Angle Video  

Vertical Chroma Graph  

AOC Q27G3XMN Vertical Chroma Graph
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Vertical Chroma Graph

Color Washout From Below 
 

27°
30°

Color Washout From Above 
 

27°
33°

Vertical Hue Graph  

AOC Q27G3XMN Vertical Hue Graph
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Vertical Hue Graph

Color Shift From Below 
 

21°
65°

Color Shift From Above 
 

20°
70°

Vertical Lightness Graph  

AOC Q27G3XMN Vertical Lightness Graph
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Vertical Lightness Graph

Brightness Loss From Below 
 

29°
31°

Brightness Loss From Above 
 

29°
34°

Black Level Raise From Below 
 

10°

Black Level Raise From Above 
 

12°

Gamma Shift From Below 
 

12°
11°

Gamma Shift From Above 
 

10°
14°
Show Text 

Gray Uniformity 
 

7.2
7.8

50% Uniformity Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN 50% Uniformity Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx 50% Uniformity Picture

50% Std. Dev. 
 

2.627%
2.109%

50% DSE 
 

0.198%
0.168%
Show Text 

Black Uniformity 
 

7.3
7.7

Native Black Uniformity Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Native Black Uniformity Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Native Black Uniformity Picture

Native Std. Dev. 
 

1.426%
1.115%

Black Uniformity Picture With Local Dimming  

AOC Q27G3XMN Black Uniformity Picture With Local Dimming
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Black Uniformity Picture With Local Dimming

Std. Dev. w/ L.D. 
 

0.292%
0.326%
Show Text 

Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration) 
 

9.0
7.3

Pre Calibration Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pre Calibration Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pre Calibration Picture

Pre Gamma Curve Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pre Gamma Curve Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pre Gamma Curve Picture

Pre Color Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pre Color Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pre Color Picture

Picture Mode 
 

Off (sRGB)
Standard (sRGB)

sRGB Gamut Area xy 
 

102.3%
95.7%

White Balance dE (Avg.) 
 

2.02
6.02

Color Temperature (Avg.) 
 

6,487 K
6,452 K

Gamma (Avg.) 
 

2.31
2.22

Color dE (Avg.) 
 

1.50
3.75

Contrast Setting 
 

N/A
N/A

RGB Settings 
 

Default
Default

Gamma Setting 
 

Default
Default

Brightness Setting 
 

70
80

Measured Brightness 
 

217 cd/m²
156 cd/m²

Brightness Locked 
 

No
No
Show Text 

Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration) 
 

9.6
9.2

Post Calibration Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Post Calibration Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Post Calibration Picture

Post Gamma Curve Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Post Gamma Curve Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Post Gamma Curve Picture

Post Color Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Post Color Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Post Color Picture

Picture Mode 
 

Off
User

sRGB Gamut Area xy 
 

98.0%
95.0%

White Balance dE (Avg.) 
 

0.56
0.69

Color Temperature (Avg.) 
 

6,504 K
6,480 K

Gamma (Avg.) 
 

2.19
2.19

Color dE (Avg.) 
 

0.54
0.82

Contrast Setting 
 

50
50

RGB Settings 
 

29-45-42
Gain (44, 50, 47), Bias (47, 47, 46)

Gamma Setting 
 

Gamma 1
2.2

Brightness Setting 
 

24
30

Measured Brightness 
 

101 cd/m²
102 cd/m²

ICC Profile 
 

Show Text 

SDR Color Gamut 
 

9.4
9.2

sRGB Color Gamut Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN sRGB Color Gamut Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx sRGB Color Gamut Picture

sRGB Coverage xy 
 

98.1%
95.3%

sRGB Picture Mode 
 

Off
User

Adobe RGB Color Gamut Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Adobe RGB Color Gamut Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Adobe RGB Color Gamut Picture

Adobe RGB Coverage xy 
 

90.4%
96.4%

Adobe RGB Picture Mode 
 

Off
User
Show Text 

HDR Color Gamut 
 

8.3
8.5

Wide Color Gamut 
 

Yes
Yes

DCI-P3 Color Gamut Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN DCI-P3 Color Gamut Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx DCI-P3 Color Gamut Picture

DCI-P3 Coverage xy 
 

91.7%
92.2%

DCI-P3 Picture Mode 
 

Display HDR
HDR On

Rec. 2020 Color Gamut Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Rec. 2020 Color Gamut Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Rec. 2020 Color Gamut Picture

Rec. 2020 Coverage xy 
 

69.6%
77.1%

Rec. 2020 Picture Mode 
 

Display HDR
HDR On
Show Text 

HDR Color Volume 
 

8.3
8.6

DCI-P3 Color Volume ITP Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN DCI-P3 Color Volume ITP Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx DCI-P3 Color Volume ITP Picture

1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp 
 

80.1%
83.2%

DCI-P3 Picture Mode 
 

Display HDR
HDR On

Rec. 2020 Color Volume ITP Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Rec. 2020 Color Volume ITP Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Rec. 2020 Color Volume ITP Picture

10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp 
 

38.6%
42.2%

Rec. 2020 Picture Mode 
 

Display HDR
HDR On
Show Text 

Text Clarity 
 

7.5
7.5

ClearType On  

AOC Q27G3XMN ClearType On
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx ClearType On

ClearType Off  

AOC Q27G3XMN ClearType Off
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx ClearType Off

Pixel Type 
 

VA
VA

Pixels  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pixels
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pixels

Subpixel Layout 
 

RGB
RGB
Show Text 

Reflections 
 

7.5
7.5

Average Room  

AOC Q27G3XMN Average Room
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Average Room

Average Room Off Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Average Room Off Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Average Room Off Picture

Bright Room Off Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Bright Room Off Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Bright Room Off Picture

Screen Finish 
 

Matte
Matte

Total Reflections 
 

5.6%
5.1%

Indirect Reflections 
 

3.6%
2.6%

Calculated Direct Reflections 
 

2.0%
2.5%
Show Text 

Gradient 
 

9.7
9.6

Gradient Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Gradient Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Gradient Picture

Color Depth 
 

10 Bit
10 Bit
Show Text 
Motion

Refresh Rate 
 

7.7
7.6

Native Refresh Rate 
 

165 Hz
170 Hz

Max Refresh Rate 
 

180 Hz
170 Hz

Max Refresh Rate Over DP 
 

180 Hz
170 Hz

Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI 
 

144 Hz
144 Hz

Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit 
 

180 Hz
170 Hz

Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit 
 

60 Hz
60 Hz
Show Text 

Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) 
 

Variable Refresh Rate 
 

Yes
Yes

FreeSync 
 

Yes
Yes

G-SYNC 
 

Compatible (Tested)
Compatible (Tested)

VRR Maximum 
 

180 Hz
170 Hz

VRR Minimum 
 

< 20 Hz
< 20 Hz

VRR Supported Connectors 
 

DisplayPort, HDMI
DisplayPort, HDMI
Show Text 

VRR Motion Performance 
 

8.8
6.8

Pursuit Photo VRR  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pursuit Photo VRR
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pursuit Photo VRR

OD Mode CAD Comparison  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Recommended VRR OD Setting 
 

Medium
Freesync Premium (Normal)

Variable Overdrive Advertised 
 

No
No

Avg. CAD 
 

109
221

Best CAD 
 

106
168

Worst CAD 
 

117
354
Show Text 

Refresh Rate Compliance 
 

8.5
7.5

Fast GTG Sequence  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

VRR Compliance  

See details on graph tool
See details on graph tool

Compliance @ Max Hz 
 

65%
53%

Compliance @ 120 FPS 
 

75%
63%

Compliance @ 60 FPS 
 

86%
73%
Show Text 

CAD @ Max Refresh Rate 
 

8.4
7.5

Pursuit Photo At Max Refresh  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pursuit Photo At Max Refresh
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pursuit Photo At Max Refresh

CAD Heatmap At Max Refresh  

AOC Q27G3XMN CAD Heatmap At Max Refresh
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx CAD Heatmap At Max Refresh

OD Transition Max Refresh Rate 
 

od-transition-max-refresh-rate-medium-0-31
OD medium
0 to 31
od-transition-max-refresh-rate-extreme-0-31
OD extreme
0 to 31

Recommended Overdrive Setting 
 

Medium
Normal

Avg. CAD 
 

107
168

Best 10% CAD 
 

29
38

Worst 10% CAD 
 

219
324
Show Text 

Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate 
 

First Response Time 
 

4.2 ms
5.7 ms

Total Response Time 
 

4.5 ms
8.4 ms

Recommended Overdrive Setting 
 

Medium
Normal

RGB Overshoot 
 

1 RGB
6 RGB

Worst 10% RGB Overshoot 
 

8 RGB
27 RGB

Worst 10% First Response Time 
 

10.3 ms
17.5 ms

Worst 10% Total Response Time 
 

10.3 ms
17.5 ms

Heatmap First Response  

AOC Q27G3XMN Heatmap First Response
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Heatmap First Response

Heatmap Total Response  

AOC Q27G3XMN Heatmap Total Response
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Heatmap Total Response

Heatmap RGB Overshoot  

AOC Q27G3XMN Heatmap RGB Overshoot
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Heatmap RGB Overshoot
Show Text 

CAD @ 120Hz 
 

8.5
7.0

Pursuit Photo 120Hz  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pursuit Photo 120Hz
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pursuit Photo 120Hz

CAD Heatmap 120Hz  

AOC Q27G3XMN CAD Heatmap 120Hz
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx CAD Heatmap 120Hz

OD Transition 120Hz 
 

od-transition-120-medium-0-31
OD medium
0 to 31
od-transition-120-extreme-0-31
OD extreme
0 to 31

Recommended Overdrive Setting 
 

Medium
Normal

Avg. CAD 
 

106
197

Best 10% CAD 
 

31
37

Worst 10% CAD 
 

203
421
Show Text 

Response Time @ 120Hz 
 

Worst 10% First Response Time 
 

9.4 ms
8.9 ms

RGB Overshoot 
 

1 RGB
10 RGB

Total Response Time 
 

4.4 ms
9.4 ms

First Response Time 
 

3.8 ms
4.2 ms

Recommended Overdrive Setting 
 

Medium
Normal

Worst 10% Total Response Time 
 

9.9 ms
17.5 ms

Worst 10% RGB Overshoot 
 

11 RGB
37 RGB

120Hz First Response Heatmap  

AOC Q27G3XMN 120Hz First Response Heatmap
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx 120Hz First Response Heatmap

120Hz Total Response Heatmap  

AOC Q27G3XMN 120Hz Total Response Heatmap
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx 120Hz Total Response Heatmap

120Hz Heatmap RGB Overshoot  

AOC Q27G3XMN 120Hz Heatmap RGB Overshoot
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx 120Hz Heatmap RGB Overshoot
Show Text 

CAD @ 60Hz 
 

8.2
4.5

Pursuit Photo 60Hz  

AOC Q27G3XMN Pursuit Photo 60Hz
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Pursuit Photo 60Hz

CAD Heatmap 60Hz  

AOC Q27G3XMN CAD Heatmap 60Hz
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx CAD Heatmap 60Hz

OD Transition 60Hz 
 

od-transition-60-medium-0-31
OD medium
0 to 31
od-transition-60-extreme-0-31
OD extreme
0 to 31

Recommended Overdrive Setting 
 

Medium
Normal

Avg. CAD 
 

116
360

Best 10% CAD 
 

29
47

Worst 10% CAD 
 

276
1,086
Show Text 

Response Time @ 60Hz 
 

Recommended Overdrive Setting 
 

Medium
Normal

First Response Time 
 

3.7 ms
4.1 ms

Total Response Time 
 

5.3 ms
19.3 ms

RGB Overshoot 
 

2 RGB
14 RGB

Worst 10% Total Response Time 
 

17.3 ms
35.2 ms

Worst 10% First Response Time 
 

9.2 ms
7.8 ms

Worst 10% RGB Overshoot 
 

16 RGB
45 RGB

60Hz First Response Heatmap  

AOC Q27G3XMN 60Hz First Response Heatmap
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx 60Hz First Response Heatmap

60Hz Total Response Heatmap  

AOC Q27G3XMN 60Hz Total Response Heatmap
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx 60Hz Total Response Heatmap

60Hz RGB Overshoot Heatmap  

AOC Q27G3XMN 60Hz RGB Overshoot Heatmap
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx 60Hz RGB Overshoot Heatmap
Show Text 

Backlight Strobing (BFI) 
 

Backlight Strobing Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Backlight Strobing Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Backlight Strobing Picture

Backlight Strobing Frequency Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Backlight Strobing Frequency Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Backlight Strobing Frequency Picture

Backlight Strobing (BFI) 
 

No BFI
No BFI

Maximum Frequency 
 

N/A
N/A

Minimum Frequency 
 

N/A
N/A

Longest Pulse Width Brightness 
 

N/A
N/A

Shortest Pulse Width Brightness 
 

N/A
N/A

Pulse Width Control 
 

No BFI
No BFI

Pulse Phase Control 
 

No BFI
No BFI

Pulse Amplitude Control 
 

No BFI
No BFI

VRR At The Same Time 
 

No BFI
No BFI
Show Text 

VRR Flicker 
 

2.0
5.4

VRR Flicker Video  

VRR Flicker Graph  

AOC Q27G3XMN VRR Flicker Graph
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx VRR Flicker Graph

Dark Gray Flicker 
 

6.7 RGB
1.6 RGB

Middle Gray Flicker 
 

5.4 RGB
3.9 RGB

Light Gray Flicker 
 

5.8 RGB
3.9 RGB
Show Text 

Image Flicker 
 

10
10

Backlight Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN Backlight Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Backlight Picture

Flicker-Free 
 

Yes
Yes

PWM Dimming Frequency 
 

>1000 Hz
>1000 Hz
Show Text 
Inputs

Input Lag 
 

9.0
8.9

Native Resolution @ Max Hz 
 

3.5 ms
3.9 ms

Native Resolution @ 120Hz 
 

5.1 ms
5.0 ms

Native Resolution @ 60Hz 
 

9.3 ms
9.0 ms

Backlight Strobing (BFI) 
 

N/A
N/A
Show Text 

Resolution 
 

7.5
7.5

Native Resolution 
 

2560 x 1440
2560 x 1440

Aspect Ratio 
 

16:9
16:9

Megapixels 
 

3.7 MP
3.7 MP

Pixel Density 
 

109 PPI
109 PPI

PS5 Compatibility 
 

4.9
4.9

PS5 Compatibility Photo  

AOC Q27G3XMN PS5 Compatibility Photo
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx PS5 Compatibility Photo

PS5 Compatibility Table  

AOC Q27G3XMN PS5 Compatibility Table
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx PS5 Compatibility Table

4k @ 120Hz 
 

No
No

4k @ 60Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1440p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1440p @ 60Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 60Hz 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Xbox Series X|S Compatibility 
 

7.1
7.1

XSX Compatibility Photo  

AOC Q27G3XMN XSX Compatibility Photo
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx XSX Compatibility Photo

XSX Compatibility Table  

AOC Q27G3XMN XSX Compatibility Table
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx XSX Compatibility Table

4k @ 120Hz 
 

No
No

4k @ 60Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1440p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1440p @ 60Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 120Hz 
 

Yes
Yes

1080p @ 60Hz 
 

Yes
Yes
Show Text 

Inputs Photos  

Inputs 1  

AOC Q27G3XMN Inputs 1
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Inputs 1

Inputs 2  

AOC Q27G3XMN Inputs 2
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx Inputs 2

Video And Audio Ports 
 

DisplayPort 
 

1 (DP 1.4)
1 (DP 1.2)

DisplayPort Transmission Bandwidth 
 

No DisplayPort 2.1
No DisplayPort 2.1

Mini DisplayPort 
 

No
No

HDMI 
 

2 (HDMI 2.0)
2 (HDMI 2.0)

HDMI 2.1 Bandwidth 
 

No HDMI 2.1
No HDMI 2.1

DVI 
 

No
No

VGA 
 

No
No

Daisy Chaining 
 

No
No

3.5mm Audio Out 
 

1
1

HDR10 
 

Yes
Yes

3.5mm Audio In 
 

No
No

3.5mm Microphone In 
 

No
No

USB 
 

USB-A Ports 
 

0
0

USB-A Rated Speed 
 

No USB-A Ports
No USB-A Ports

USB-B Upstream Port 
 

No
No

USB-C Ports 
 

0
0

USB-C Upstream 
 

No USB-C Ports
No USB-C Ports

USB-C Rated Speed 
 

No USB-C Ports
No USB-C Ports

USB-C Power Delivery 
 

No USB-C Ports
No USB-C Ports

USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode 
 

No USB-C Ports
No USB-C Ports

Thunderbolt 
 

No
No

macOS Compatibility 
 

macOS Screenshot  

AOC Q27G3XMN macOS Screenshot
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx macOS Screenshot
Show Text 
Features

Additional Features 
 

HDR10 
 

Yes
Yes

Speakers 
 

No
No

RGB Illumination 
 

No
Presets

Multiple Input Display 
 

No
No

KVM Switch 
 

No
No
Show Text 

On-Screen Display (OSD) 
 

OSD Picture  

AOC Q27G3XMN OSD Picture
Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx OSD Picture

Check Price

27"
Nitro XV275U P3biipx
SEE PRICE
Amazon.com

AOC Q27G3XMN

Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx

Comments

  1. Comparison

AOC Q27G3XMN vs Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx: Main Discussion

What do you think of these products? Let us know below.


Looking for a personalized buying advice from the RTINGS.com experts? Insiders have direct access to buying advice on our insider forum.

PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
Sort by:
newest first
  1. Update: Made the Audeze Maxwell Wireless the ‘Best Gaming Headset’ and moved the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless for Xbox to Notable Mentions.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

    Show More Updates
  2. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    How do you call something the best when it’s rated lower than 2 other headsets for wierless gaming?

  3. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    How do you call something the best when it’s rated lower than 2 other headsets for wireless gaming?

    that’s called paid advertising/marketing

  4. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hello,

    Just to clarify confidentflame, we don’t accept any incentives from companies in exchange for a good review or placement in our recommendation articles. We always purchase our own products so that our units aren’t cherry-picked; this better reflects what users can expect to receive if they were to also purchase a unit.

    Applesauce57, to answer your question, while the wireless gaming score is important and can help users see at a glance whether a product is right for them, we go beyond the score for our recommendation articles because the score alone doesn’t always paint the full picture of a product’s performance. This especially true for in ‘best gaming headsets’ article, as we aren’t just strictly comparing wireless headsets.

    For example, in the case of the Astro A50 (which have the top wireless gaming score), users have reported that they’re unable to update their unit’s firmware. This is especially bad if you game on a newer console via USB, because you won’t be able to use the headphones on these consoles at all until you update their firmware.

    In the case of the SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless, the headset with the second best wireless gaming score, this headset is slowly being discontinued in favor of the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless. Additionally, many users have reported that the hinges of their units broke over time, which isn’t great for such high-end headphones.

    I hope that illuminates things. If you have further questions, please don’t hesitate to ask.

  5. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I appreciate you taking the time to quickly respond, and define Rtings process and mindset of ratings and placement.

    I do have a question: using the reviewed master list of headphones, I wanted to find usb only wired gaming headphones, not the analog to usb versions, to which I was able to activate that particular filter. However, Steelseries, Logitech, HyperX, and Razor are (mostly) analog to usb headphones, and they were all within the usb only, “non analog-to-usb” filter I set up. Is there something I’m missing that allows them to be within my search parameters?

  6. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    So why not include those things in a graded review? If I want the best wierless headset, I’m going to base that off the score you give it. Build quality and software are part of that wierless experience. If the headset isn’t the best, don’t give it the best score. The penrose for example has very poor Build quality. It sounds great but I would give it a 6/10 because I’m currently waiting for my 2nd warranty set to be shipped back to me.

  7. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I appreciate you taking the time to quickly respond, and define Rtings process and mindset of ratings and placement. I do have a question: using the reviewed master list of headphones, I wanted to find usb only wired gaming headphones, not the analog to usb versions, to which I was able to activate that particular filter. However, Steelseries, Logitech, HyperX, and Razor are (mostly) analog to usb headphones, and they were all within the usb only, “non analog-to-usb” filter I set up. Is there something I’m missing that allows them to be within my search parameters?

    Hello again,

    That’s a good question. It’s tricky to sort for strictly USB headsets. I’ve created this table. These headsets are wired-only and a lot of them have the USB cable built in. I wasn’t sure if you were looking for USB-A or USB-C, but both options are listed in the table. I hope this is closer to what you’re looking for, but if you have any further questions, don’t hesitate to ask.

  8. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    So why not include those things in a graded review? If I want the best wierless headset, I’m going to base that off the score you give it. Build quality and software are part of that wierless experience. If the headset isn’t the best, don’t give it the best score. The penrose for example has very poor Build quality. It sounds great but I would give it a 6/10 because I’m currently waiting for my 2nd warranty set to be shipped back to me.

    Hello again,

    To answer your question, applesauce57, these measurements are already included in the wireless gaming score. However, build quality and software each make up only 4.0% of the total score, which is quite low. Other tests like non-Bluetooth wireless latency and comfort are weighted a lot more (16.0% and 16.8%, respectively). When we removed the Astro A50 from our list in 2022, we mentioned their software issue in our update. However, we recognize that there are limitations to our scores and many headphones can even reach the same score but with different test results. Even though the Astro A50 and SteelSeries Arctis Pro both had score changes to reflect their aforementioned issues, the Astro A50 for example, are still highly comfortable and have a fair passive soundstage performance, which skews their score higher.

    We’re working to improve our test bench and scoring, so if you have any suggestions, we’d love to hear it. You can even check out more what we’re working on here.

  9. Update: We’ve replaced the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro with the Logitech G PRO X 2 LIGHTSPEED Wireless, as the Logitech offer more connection options and are more comfortable. We’ve also added the Astro A30 to Notable Mentions and removed the SteelSeries Arctis 7+ Wireless, Xbox Wireless Headset, and Razer Kaira Pro Wireless for Xbox.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

    Show More Updates
  10. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Is Audeze LCD-GX worth mentioning in higher price range?

  11. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Is Audeze LCD-GX worth mentioning in higher price range?

    Hi there!

    Unfortunately, we haven’t tested the Audeze LCD-GX yet, so we don’t know how it performs compared to our top picks like the Audeze Maxwell Wireless. That doesn’t mean that they’re bad headphones though! They’re in our voting queue, so if they get enough votes, we’ll test them.

    Hope that helps!

  12. Update: No product pick changes. Some text edits for clarity.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

    Show More Updates
  13. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    No Audio Technica or Beyerdynamic headsets?

  14. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    No Audio Technica or Beyerdynamic headsets?

    Hi there,

    Unfortunately, we haven’t tested any strictly gaming headphones from Audio-Technica or Beyerdynamic, so we can’t say for sure how well they perform compared to headphones we have tested. However, you can always suggest a particular model and if it gets enough votes, we’ll buy it and test it. That said, there are a few audiophile headphones from both brands that are worth considering for gamers such as the Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO. They just don’t have mic support, which may be a deal breaker for some users.

    I hope that helps clear up things!

  15. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    I find it a shame that criteria lower the rating of certain headsets in gaming. For example, an audiophile headset without a microphone can very well be an excellent gaming headset. Provided that it is used with a sound card and that a separate microphone is used. And yet it will arrive behind a gaming headset. Or how is it possible for a gaming headset to be first when its imaging rating is 5.7, which is a key criterion for gaming. I want to thank you for all this work, it’s incredible what you offer as a completely free service.

  16. 1
    0
    -1
    1
    -1

    Best gaming headset is not a gaming headset who ever says different is lying or dont know wtf they talking about. Get a pair of DT990 pro or DT770 open back or closed, depends of if you live alone or not. You need a dac for them to max 200 bucks for headset and dac. I guarantee you will have better sound for gaming footsteps overall. You will have sounds you never hear on the so called overpriced Gaming headsets. I say this cause I tested most of them, not cause I am a pro gamer getting sponsorship for a gaming brand. Most pros wearing in ear under the sponsored headsets anyway🤣 . So conclusion you can go buy top top gaming so called premium headset for pricerange 300-600-700 dollars just because someone tells you its the best gaming headset or some forum says it. Or use your head and buy a stereo headset for 100-200 max and hear all the footsteps in details spot enemy faster. Gaming headset there is no such thing. Please start testing this things out and dont be sell outs. Then you can get knowledge and learn a thing or two. You have some real good stereo headsets out there for gaming, From PHILIPS, AUDIO TECHNICA, Sennheiser, Sony Beyer Dynamics and more. Test them do proper review.

  17. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    I find it a shame that criteria lower the rating of certain headsets in gaming. For example, an audiophile headset without a microphone can very well be an excellent gaming headset. Provided that it is used with a sound card and that a separate microphone is used. And yet it will arrive behind a gaming headset. Or how is it possible for a gaming headset to be first when its imaging rating is 5.7, which is a key criterion for gaming. I want to thank you for all this work, it’s incredible what you offer as a completely free service.

    Thanks for taking the time to point out what you would like to see changed. Our current gaming scores do in fact account for the microphone capabilities and we are aware that there is more and more people that are choosing to go for the headphone of their choice + a dedicated microphone for gaming. We definitely would like to be able to provide recommendations for people looking into this kind of setup in the future. If you have any input or suggestions, on how you would like us to approach such recommendations, do not hesitate to share any ideas or aspect you would consider when looking to buy headset for gaming purposes that would be combined with a dedicated microphone.

  18. Update: We’ve added the Corsair VIRTUOSO PRO as an in-text alternative for the ‘Best Open-Back Gaming Headset’ pick. We’ve made minor changes to the text and ensured all products are still in stock.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

  19. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I have asteo a50 gen4 on my pc…. I just order arctis nova pro wireless ….it’s a good move? Or I’ll be disappointed? … I play racing game and I have loud wind and D-Box for the immersion. Thanks

  20. Update: We’ve checked this article’s text to ensure it’s still up-to-date and accurate. There have been minor updates to the text, but our picks haven’t changed.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

  21. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I have asteo a50 gen4 on my pc…. I just order arctis nova pro wireless ….it’s a good move? Or I’ll be disappointed? … I play racing game and I have loud wind and D-Box for the immersion. Thanks

    Hi there,

    While the Astro A50 Gen 4 have a higher wireless gaming score, there are different pros and cons to each headset. Both have a customizable sound, so unless you’re planning to only use the headphones out of the box, the differences will be more noticeable in mic performance, comfort, and extra features like Bluetooth. For comfort and a more immersive sound, the Astro will be better. They’re able to create a more immersive passive soundstage. However, if you want to stay connected to your PC and smartphone simultaneously or you need noise cancelling, then the SteelSeries are better. For a more detailed comparison, you can check out both products side by side.

    Hope that helps!

  22. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Any opinion on the best wireless pink gaming headset?

  23. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hello! Maybe someone could help me out: In terms of footstep tracking which wireless headset would be the best just purely for FPS? I’ve heard good things about the Turtle Beach Stealth Pros but Logitech G Pro X 2 Lightspeed is better rated here so which one would be better? Thank you.

  24. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hello! Maybe someone could help me out: In terms of footstep tracking which wireless headset would be the best just purely for FPS? I’ve heard good things about the Turtle Beach Stealth Pros but Logitech G Pro X 2 Lightspeed is better rated here so which one would be better? Thank you.

    I’m currently testing the Stealth Pro, but the hissing in the background on high volumes makes it hard to keep for me I think. So I don’t really know

  25. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Any opinion on the best wireless pink gaming headset?

    Hi there,

    If you’re looking for pink wireless gaming headsets, you’ll want to check out Razer. They make the Razer Barracuda X in pink (they call this colorway ‘Quartz’). The Logitech G PRO X 2 LIGHTSPEED also come in pink via the manufacturer’s website (though they’re darker in color than the Razer). The Logitech offer a significantly better overall performance than the Razer though, and you can see a comparison here.

    Hope that helps!

  26. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hi there, If you’re looking for pink wireless gaming headsets, you’ll want to check out Razer. They make the Razer Barracuda X in pink (they call this colorway ‘Quartz’). The Logitech G PRO X 2 LIGHTSPEED also come in pink via the manufacturer’s website (though they’re darker in color than the Razer). The Logitech offer a significantly better overall performance than the Razer though, and you can see a comparison here. Hope that helps!

    We ended up going for the barracuda non x in pink. We tried the lightspeed at best buy but it kept getting caught in her hair when she tried to take it off so that wasnt going to work for us. the baracudda is nice, though the mic is a bit dissapointing and they arent as open as we would have liked (there are like 0 open backed wireless gaming headphones let alone pink ones).

  27. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hello! Maybe someone could help me out: In terms of footstep tracking which wireless headset would be the best just purely for FPS? I’ve heard good things about the Turtle Beach Stealth Pros but Logitech G Pro X 2 Lightspeed is better rated here so which one would be better? Thank you.

    Hello! Help with personalized advice is something our experts to those who support us via our insider forums. Otherwise, we have lots of self-service tools and recommendation articles that may be helpful!

  28. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hey guys I have a question about the Maxwell gaming headset. It looks like they have personalized spatial audio? Is that correct? Like how Creative does with their SXFI app and taking pics of your face and ears? I think Apple is doing that now too with their new headphones.

  29. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    I tried the Maxwell and had an issue with two different pairs nobody seems to mention. These things can be quite warm and condensation builds up easily, causing a popping or crackling sound. Was a complete deal breaker on an otherwise phenomenal headset.

    Edit: Some additional details. I experienced this with both the stock and WC Freeze pads. My room is always kept to a reasonable 72-73. I don’t sweat excessively. I do have longer hair that takes a while to dry, the first time I noticed this was not long after a shower, however on the second pair I noticed this even when my hair was completely dry.

    It seems the metal body and lack of ventilation on the pads is the perfect combo for moisture build up and due to the nature of planar magnetic drivers this causes the notorious “crinkle” you’re not supposed to experience until much later.

    Edited 1 year ago: additional clarification
  30. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hey guys I have a question about the Maxwell gaming headset. It looks like they have personalized spatial audio? Is that correct? Like how Creative does with their SXFI app and taking pics of your face and ears? I think Apple is doing that now too with their new headphones.

    Hi Riekopo,

    Thanks for your question. We’ll take a look on our unit to verify if it has the personalized spacial audio feature and update the review accordingly if we find anything.

    Thanks, Matt

  31. Update: We’ve made minor updates to the text for accuracy and added the Sony INZONE Buds Truly Wireless as a Notable Mention.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

    Show More Updates
  32. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I was wondering which of these headsets has its own independent volume control? I hate those where the volume wheel controls the windows sound

  33. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I was wondering which of these headsets has its own independent volume control? I hate those where the volume wheel controls the windows sound

    Hey there,

    Unfortunately, we don’t note this feature when testing the headsets. For that reason, I’d suggest checking out something with its own outboard DAC, like the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless. That way, you can be pretty certain when adjusting the volume that it won’t change the volume in Windows.

    Thanks!

    Edited 1 year ago: Grammar fix
  34. Update: We’ve made minor changes to the text to ensure accuracy and availability, but there hasn’t been a change in our recommendations.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

  35. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Is there any best wireless gaming buds category?

  36. We removed a couple of Notable Mentions because better options are listed in the article. We made small changes to the text for clarity and checked that our picks are in stock, but our picks haven’t changed.

    What do you think of these changes? Let us know

    Edited by  Meghan Overbury10 months ago: clarity
  37. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Is there any best wireless gaming buds category?

    Yep! There’s a few options listed here that you might enjoy :)

  38. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Are Audeze Maxwell the best Gaming Headsets for PC too? or is it only for consoles?

  39. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    Are Audeze Maxwell the best Gaming Headsets for PC too? or is it only for consoles?

    Hi fedd,

    Yes, the Audeze Maxwell are our pick for the Best Gaming Headsets, and that includes PCs alongside consoles. Although we’ve only tested the Xbox model and can confirm they work with PC, both of the console variants should be compatible with PCs. Are there specific features you’re prioritizing or looking for?

    Thanks!

  40. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    I am trying to find the best noise-cancelling gaming WIRED (not wireless) out there, usually Rtings is very good, but they seem to have a pretty big hole in their recommendation for what I want….

    the best I can find is the “Bose QuietComfort® 35 II Gaming Headset” but I cannot find the thing for sale anywhere….

    I cannot be the only person in the situation where they game in a noisy room with other family members making lots of noise who needs good headphones with a good mic.

    Important points for me are 1) WIRED (I do not want to deal with headphones running out of Battary 2) ANC 3) Comfortable enough to fit around my big head/ears 4) Great gaming sound (for being able to tell direction in FPS, but also for immersion in single player) 5) very high quality mic so its easy for others to understand me in online games or on video chat…. I want to sound crystal clear.

    I was thinking MAYBE the new Sony UTLs, but I am very unsure. I have been trying to figure this out for at least a year now and there is still no one clear option…

    …I would GREATLY appreciate an expanded gaming headset section with a new category for ANC Gaming Headsets OR at the VERY LEAST, at least one recommendation for the best ANC Gaming Headset. Any help here or there would be MUCH appreciated.

    Edited 8 months ago: Added more detail
  41. 3
    2
    1
    2
    0

    I am trying to find the best noise-cancelling gaming WIRED (not wireless) out there, usually Rtings is very good, but they seem to have a pretty big hole in their recommendation for what I want…. the best I can find is the “Bose QuietComfort® 35 II Gaming Headset” but I cannot find the thing for sale anywhere…. I cannot be the only person in the situation where they game in a noisy room with other family members making lots of noise who needs good headphones with a good mic. Important points for me are 1) WIRED (I do not want to deal with headphones running out of Battary 2) ANC 3) Comfortable enough to fit around my big head/ears 4) Great gaming sound (for being able to tell direction in FPS, but also for immersion in single player) 5) very high quality mic so its easy for others to understand me in online games or on video chat…. I want to sound crystal clear. I was thinking MAYBE the new Sony UTLs, but I am very unsure. I have been trying to figure this out for at least a year now and there is still no one clear option… …I would GREATLY appreciate an expanded gaming headset section with a new category for ANC Gaming Headsets OR at the VERY LEAST, at least one recommendation for the best ANC Gaming Headset. Any help here or there would be MUCH appreciated.

    Hey there,

    Unfortunately, as you noted, there aren’t many current production wired ANC headsets, and no matter what, you’ll still need to charge a battery if you want ANC.

    I agree that if you can find a pair of the Bose QC 35 II Gaming Headset, then I think you’d be happy with them based on what you’ve said. It’s too bad the headset was discontinued.

    If you’re willing to compromise on noise cancelling a bit for an all-in-one solution, the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless is my first suggestion. They’re one of the few gaming headsets that can be used wired that we’ve tested with ANC that’s decent. And, while it might appear that their ANC is worse than the Bose QC 35 II Gaming Headset, they were tested with two different methodologies, so the actual performance is closer than the numbers suggest. The SteelSeries might be overkill in some regards for your needs, but you can adjust their EQ to your tastes, and they offer a few other luxuries. Plus, the onboard mic is rather good as well. That said, no, the ANC doesn’t perform as well as the Sony ULT WEAR.

    This leads me to my next suggestion. If you’re gaming primarily on PC, I would actually recommend looking at ANC headphones that can be used wired and just buying an outboard microphone. The reason I recommend this is that you care about sound, but the majority of non-gaming headphones with integrated mics drastically alter their sound profiles when the mic is active, defeating the point of good sound. In the case of the Sony ULT WEAR Wireless, you can see here that the treble range in the sound profile is totally shelved off when the mic is active. However, the noise cancelling is better on many ordinary ANC headphones than the noise cancelling on the few gaming headsets we’ve tested with ANC. Using an outboard mic would give you a clearer voice, while the ANC headphones would provide isolation from your space without compromising the sound quality of the game and your team in the chat.

    So the ULT WEAR have a bassier sound, if that’s your preference. I’d also suggest looking at the Bose QuietComfort Headphones Wireless; these have fantastic noise cancelling, and you can use them wired with an in-line mic. I can’t attest to the quality of the in-line mic, though, because we tested the integrated mic instead. Anyway, that could tie you over until you get an outboard mic if you don’t want to invest in both headphones and a mic simultaneously, and the ANC shouldn’t disappoint.

    Hopefully, this gives you some direction in a pretty limited market. Thanks!

  42. 2
    1
    0
    1
    0

    Hey there, Unfortunately, as you noted, there aren’t many current production wired ANC headsets, and no matter what, you’ll still need to charge a battery if you want ANC. I agree that if you can find a pair of the Bose QC 35 II Gaming Headset, then I think you’d be happy with them based on what you’ve said. It’s too bad the headset was discontinued. If you’re willing to compromise on noise cancelling a bit for an all-in-one solution, the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless is my first suggestion. They’re one of the few gaming headsets that can be used wired that we’ve tested with ANC that’s decent. And, while it might appear that their ANC is worse than the Bose QC 35 II Gaming Headset, they were tested with two different methodologies, so the actual performance is closer than the numbers suggest. The SteelSeries might be overkill in some regards for your needs, but you can adjust their EQ to your tastes, and they offer a few other luxuries. Plus, the onboard mic is rather good as well. That said, no, the ANC doesn’t perform as well as the Sony ULT WEAR. This leads me to my next suggestion. If you’re gaming primarily on PC, I would actually recommend looking at ANC headphones that can be used wired and just buying an outboard microphone. The reason I recommend this is that you care about sound, but the majority of non-gaming headphones with integrated mics drastically alter their sound profiles when the mic is active, defeating the point of good sound. In the case of the Sony ULT WEAR Wireless, you can see here that the treble range in the sound profile is totally shelved off when the mic is active. However, the noise cancelling is better on many ordinary ANC headphones than the noise cancelling on the few gaming headsets we’ve tested with ANC. Using an outboard mic would give you a clearer voice, while the ANC headphones would provide isolation from your space without compromising the sound quality of the game and your team in the chat. So the ULT WEAR have a bassier sound, if that’s your preference. I’d also suggest looking at the Bose QuietComfort Headphones Wireless; these have fantastic noise cancelling, and you can use them wired with an in-line mic. I can’t attest to the quality of the in-line mic, though, because we tested the integrated mic instead. Anyway, that could tie you over until you get an outboard mic if you don’t want to invest in both headphones and a mic simultaneously, and the ANC shouldn’t disappoint. Hopefully, this gives you some direction in a pretty limited market. Thanks!

    Hello!

    That’s extremely helpful yet a bit depressing lol :-)

    I cannot fathom why the Bose QC 35 II Gaming Headset has been discontinued, do you have any idea if that is because a new Bose QC 35 III Gaming Headset is coming out?

    I had a SteelSeries before and I really liked it. In the case of the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless, when it is plugged in, can it be used non-stop without running out of power? i.e. does the battery charge just as fast as it is used? And will having it always plugged in damage the amount of charge that the battery is able to hold? (I am assuming here that it is connected via USB so the same cable that carries the audio carries the power charge as well….) I see that it has two batteries and each one should last 25 hours and cannot be charged and used at the same time, so that kinda answers that question.

    Introducing the wireless element just seems to introduce two potential problems that I REALLY don’t want to deal with: 1) Running out of Battery or 2) Losing connection

    I noticed that the wired version of the same headset doesn’t have ANC yet the wireless version — can you help me understand why? Is ANC just a power-drain that cannot be provided via a USB cable attached to a PC.

    I have just had really bad experiences with wireless headsets in the past: losing connection, running out of battery very quickly, turning on “haptic” mode dramatically reducing battery life (I am looking at you Razer). Speaking of which, is it just be or is Razer only really good at mice and pretty much everything else they make is cheap crap that tends to break after a year of use?

    Anyways, your idea to get a separate mic is an interesting one which I had not previously considered.

    If I am going to do that, the mic is going to need to be pretty flexible, I game in a kinda non-typical setup where there is no place to put a stand-up mic in front of me. I will need something that clips on the desk and swings in and out OR somehow attaches directly to the ANC headset….

    If I am going to go with that solution, does it make sense to go all-out and get an audio interface with a separate connection for a USB ANC Headset and a XLR Mic?

    Sorry, despite your detailed answer, I don’t really feel any closer to a clear choice than before :-)

    Is it correct to assume that some combinations of headset and mic work better than others? Or is each component completely independent of each other?

    Would Rtings consider making a top five heading headset/separate mic combinations for ANC gaming? If that’s something you guys might do anyways, I could just wait for you to do the research and then hopefully the answer becomes obvious…

    Or maybe add a section where stand-alone mics are tested so I could take the best from that category and pair it with the best from the existing ANC category…