Monitors are available with many different panel types, each impacting picture quality and motion performance in its own way. Modern monitors either contain an OLED panel or an LED-backlit LCD panel, the latter being commonly known as an LED display. Both OLEDs and LEDs have different panel types, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. In this article, we'll look at common panel types found in modern monitors and cover some differences in picture quality and motion handling.
Although a monitor's performance depends on many factors besides the panel type, certain types are better at some aspects than others. Understanding this can help you make a buying decision according to your needs.
You can also learn more about different panel types in TVs.
We can classify modern monitors as either having OLED or LED displays, but that doesn't tell the whole story, as there are different panel types within each category. Each panel type displays an image differently, which impacts the picture quality and motion performance. Below is a quick explanation of each common panel type:
Each panel type performs differently in picture quality and motion handling. We'll break down the main differences between them below, but keep in mind that these are general characteristics and don't define the performance of every monitor.
Unless specified, we'll compare photos from the Dell Alienware AW2725DF (QD-OLED), LG 27GR93U-B (IPS), AOC Q27G3XMN (VA), and the ASUS ROG Swift Pro PG248QP (TN).
The main advantage of OLEDs is how much better the black levels are compared to LED displays. Because they can turn pixels on and off individually, they display perfect black levels with a near-infinite contrast ratio. OLEDs also have perfect black uniformity without any blooming around bright objects. This applies for both QD-OLED and WOLED displays.
Although VA panels are the best amongst LED displays for this, they're still far behind OLEDs. That said, LED displays with Mini LED backlighting can deliver the closest performance to an OLED if their local dimming features perform well. You can see examples of this with the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx with local dimming off compared to having local dimming on.
Winner: OLED
You can also learn about how we test contrast and black uniformity.
While OLEDs are the best choice to use in a dark room, LED displays are actually better to use in a bright room. They generally get brighter, but multiple factors impact the brightness besides the panel type. Even the backlighting type can impact the brightness, as most monitors that use full-array backlighting (including Mini LED monitors) get brighter than those with edge-lit backlighting. That said, this isn't a guarantee, and theoretically, you can have an edge-lit monitor that gets brighter than a full-array display, but in the current monitor market, the brightest displays are those with full-array Mini LED backlighting.
OLEDs don't have a backlight and their panel type impacts the brightness. OLEDs get their brightest with small highlights in HDR, but they can't sustain this brightness with larger highlights. While QD-OLEDs generally get brighter than WOLEDs with small highlights, they still aren't as bright as LEDs, especially in SDR.
Below are the average results for various brightness measurements we perform in SDR and HDR from 175 monitors we've tested on Test Bench 1.2 and Test Bench 2.0.1. We separated the results for edge-lit and full-array displays to show their differences. That said, we didn't include the HDR brightness results for TN panels because only one TN monitor we've tested on these test benches actually supports HDR.
Test | IPS (Edge-lit) | IPS (Full-Array) | VA (Edge-lit) | VA (Full-Array) | TN | WOLED | QD-OLED |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count | 81 | 8 | 32 | 9 | 5 | 23 | 17 |
Avg. SDR Real Scene | 367 cd/m2 | 561 cd/m2 | 351 cd/m2 | 587 cd/m2 | 307 cd/m2 | 224 cd/m2 | 251 cd/m2 |
Avg. HDR Real Scene | 447 cd/m2 | 918 cd/m2 | 400 cd/m2 | 715 cd/m2 | - | 488 cd/m2 | 412 cd/m2 |
Avg. HDR Peak 2% | 460 cd/m2 | 780 cd/m2 | 454 cd/m2 | 877 cd/m2 | - | 845 cd/m2 | 1010 cd/m2 |
Avg. HDR Peak 100% | 478 cd/m2 | 1221 cd/m2 | 431 cd/m2 | 721 cd/m2 | - | 192 cd/m2 | 258 cd/m2 |
Winner: LED
You can also learn about our brightness testing.
While reflection handling is something to consider before buying a monitor to use in a bright room, the monitor's screen coating affects how well it handles glare. Most monitors have matte or semi-gloss coatings, but many QD-OLEDs have glossy coatings instead. This means they handle glare differently than other monitors, as reflective light is more direct, like a mirror, and matte or semi-gloss coatings spread light out more. That said, theoretically speaking, any panel type can come with any given screen coating.
While the panel type doesn't directly impact the brightness, it does on the viewing angles. This is where OLEDs have an advantage, but IPS panels aren't far behind. That said, VA and TN panels have narrow viewing angles, so the image quickly washes out when you view it off-angle. TN panels even have inverted colors when you look at the display from below. If you have an old laptop with this panel, you can see this if you tilt the screen too far.
When it comes to OLEDs, there's no difference in viewing angles between QD-OLED and WOLED displays.
Winner: OLED
You can also learn how we test for the horizontal and vertical viewing angles.
Gray uniformity varies between units, even those of the same model, so it's hard to generalize here, especially between LED panel types. For the most part, OLEDs are the most uniform, but even with that, they have issues with faint vertical lines in near-dark scenes. That said, this problem is hard for most people to see, and you likely won't notice it with most content.
Winner: OLED
You can also learn about how we test gray uniformity.
Multiple factors impact the colors that a monitor displays, so it isn't only dependent on the panel type. The color gamut really varies from model to model, and even amongst LED panel types, there isn't much of a clear trend with this. Some even have quantum dot layers to display a wider range of colors, which is what we see with QD-OLEDs and some IPS monitors.
There's more of a difference with color volume as QD-OLEDs display the most vivid colors. This is an advantage of the panel technology of QD-OLEDs specifically, and they display more vivid colors than WOLEDs. One area where WOLEDs really struggle is displaying bright colors, particularly colors other than white. On the other hand, VAs generally have better color volume than IPS and TN panels because they do a better job at displaying dark colors due to their higher contrast. That said, monitors with good local dimming features also tend to have good color volume, as it helps them display bright and dark colors well, regardless of panel type.
Below are examples of different color volumes in the DCI-P3 and Rec. 2020 color spaces between different panel types. The WOLED results are from the Sony INZONE M10S.
Winner: QD-OLED
You can also learn about how we test the SDR color gamut, HDR color gamut, and HDR color volume.
While OLEDs are the clear winners regarding picture quality for the most part, there are some areas in which LED displays win. One is with text clarity because computer programs don't render text properly with the triangular subpixel layout of QD-OLEDs or the four-pixel layout of WOLEDs. There's fringing on both WOLED and QD-OLEDs with Windows ClearType enabled, but QD-OLEDs also have fringing at the top and bottom edges of windows.
As there are WOLEDs available with two different subpixel layouts, the older RWBG and the newer RGWB, they also look a bit different when it comes to text clarity. The RGWB layout has a bit less fringing, but the difference is hard to tell, and you'll likely only notice it if you're looking closely at text.
For the most part, text clarity doesn't change among LED panel types unless they have an unconventional subpixel layout, like a handful that have a BGR subpixel layout. Below are some examples of text clarity on 27-inch, 1440p monitors with different layouts.
Winner: LED, any panel type.
You can also learn about how we test text clarity.
Lastly, the biggest downside with OLEDs is the risk of burn-in. This can happen with constant exposure to the same static elements over time, especially if you have the screen at the max brightness without varying content. This is a big concern if you need a monitor only for work, as static elements like toolbars can increase the risk of burn-in. It isn't so much of an issue if you change up what you do with your monitor, like by gaming or watching videos every so often. If that concerns you, it's better to go for an LED display, as they don't risk burn-in.
Learn about our accelerated burn-in test with TVs.
There are also some differences when it comes to the appearance of motion. This is another area in which OLEDs are superior to LEDs because they have a near-instantaneous response time for extremely sharp motion. TNs have the best motion handling in terms of LED panels, while VAs are known to have black smearing.
Like many aspects of picture quality, motion handling changes from model to model, and any defining characteristics between panel types are just generalizations. Also, most LED monitors have overdrive settings that drive the pixels for a faster response time at the cost of overshoot, which causes inverse ghosting. This can happen with any type of LED display.
Below are examples of the different panel types with our pursuit pattern at 240Hz. You can see some of the typical characteristics of each panel type, like the fact that motion looks sharp on the OLED and TN displays, while the IPS has blur and the VA has black smearing.
Winner: OLED
You can also learn about our motion testing.
While these different panel types affect motion in their own way, it's important to remember that the panel type doesn't impact the input lag. This is related to the monitor's processing and changes from model to model. This means you can have two models with the same panel with very different input lag.
It's clear that OLEDs offer the most advantages regarding picture quality and motion handling, but that doesn't mean that OLEDs are the best choice for everyone. There are a few reasons why you wouldn't want to get an OLED:
Besides these factors, choosing an OLED or an LED monitor really comes down to personal preference. If you're looking to buy a new monitor, you should get whichever model is perfect for your needs.
You can also see all our monitor recommendations for more help making a buying decision.
Technology constantly evolves, and monitor panels are no different. Manufacturers are always trying to improve and create an all-around perfect display, which current OLEDs don't provide due to their drawbacks. We'll likely see different types of OLEDs in the future that allow them to get brighter, like the tandem OLED technology in the seventh-generation iPad Pro. We may see this tandem OLED in monitors as early as 2026, but no monitor models using this technology have been announced at the time of writing this article. Tandem OLED is just a newer generation of WOLED that's advertised to get brighter and isn't a completely new panel technology.
Another panel technology we may see in the future is quantum dot electroluminescent (QDEL), which is self-emissive like OLED but without organic material, so it should be less prone to burn-in. MicroLED panels, which consist of many tiny microscopic LEDs that form pixels, are also a possibility in the future. We'll likely see this type of panel on larger displays before they transition to monitors.
What are your thoughts about these emerging panel technologies? We'd love to hear them in the comments.
With many different monitor panel technologies to choose from, it can be difficult to understand which is the best and which to buy. Monitors are classified as OLED or LED, and even though they each have different types of panels, there's a clear difference between OLED and LED displays. OLEDs offer better contrast, no blooming, more vivid colors, and superior motion handling. Although OLEDs have an advantage for the most part, this doesn't mean they're the better choice for most people, as LEDs don't risk burn-in, have better text clarity, and generally get brighter. Knowing which panel technology is the best really depends on your needs.
What do you think of our article? Let us know below.
Want to learn more? Check out our complete list of articles and tests on the R&D page.
While lack of proper Clear Type implementation impacts OLEDs, another contributing factor towards fringing and text quality is amount of black “dead space” around individual sub pixels.
Small mistake in the text clarity section as the “cleartype on” image is linked twice for IPS, RGB from the looks of it.