Notice: Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.

Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75  Monitor Review

Review updated Apr 08, 2024 at 12:58pm
Retest Aug 06, 2025 at 02:19pm
Tested using methodology v2.1 
Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75
7.9
PC Gaming 
8.7
Console Gaming 
8.3
Office 
7.9
Editing 
7.6
Brightness 
8.1
Response Time 
7.7
HDR Picture 
8.2
SDR Picture 
 29

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 is a 32-inch 4k monitor that Samsung released in 2022. Part of the Odyssey gaming lineup, it's different from other G7 models like the Samsung Odyssey G7/G70B S32BG70 because it uses Mini LED backlighting and quantum dot technology to display a wider range of colors, similar to the higher-end Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85. It also features a 1000R curved screen to bring the edges more within your field of vision. It focuses on both console and PC gaming because it has a 165Hz refresh rate, VRR support, and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth that allows you to play 4k games at a high frame rate, as long as your graphics card supports it.

Our Verdict

7.9
PC Gaming 

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 is very good for PC gaming. It has a 165Hz refresh rate with VRR support to reduce screen tearing. It has low input lag for a responsive feel and motion looks sharp for the most part, but there's more inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates with VRR enabled. It also has noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates, which is mostly distracting in dark scenes. On the plus side, it delivers good picture quality thanks to its decent local dimming feature and high brightness that makes small highlights pop.

Pros
  • Supports all common VRR formats.
  • Fast response time with most refresh rates.
  • Decent local dimming.
  • Small highlights pop against dark backgrounds.
  • Low input lag with most settings.
Cons
  • Distracting VRR flicker with changing frame rates.
  • Some blooming around bright objects.
  • More inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates.
8.7
Console Gaming 

The Samsung Neo G7 is excellent for console gaming. It takes full advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S due to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and it delivers detailed images thanks to its 4k resolution. Motion looks sharp, but it doesn't eliminate all blur, and it has low enough input lag for a responsive feel, which is great for playing reaction-based games. It also provides life-like images, especially when playing HDR games, as it has a decent local dimming feature that helps it display deep blacks, and colors are vivid.

Pros
  • HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
  • Fast response time with most refresh rates.
  • Decent local dimming.
  • Small highlights pop against dark backgrounds.
  • Low input lag with most settings.
Cons
  • Some blooming around bright objects.
  • More inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates.
8.3
Office 

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 is great for office use. The 32-inch screen and high 4k resolution are good enough to open multiple windows at once, and the text clarity is fantastic. It also has okay reflection handling, and it gets bright enough to fight glare, but there are distracting changes in the brightness when you leave the local dimming feature on. Sadly, it has narrow viewing angles that make the image look washed out from the sides.

Pros
  • 4k resolution results in sharp text.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Great ergonomics.
Cons
  • Narrow viewing angles.
7.9
Editing 

The Samsung Neo G7 is great for content creators. With a 32-inch screen and 4k resolution, you can edit photos and videos with sharp detail and see more of your work area at once. It also has excellent overall ergonomics that make it easy to adjust, but with a curved screen and narrow viewing angles, it's hard to share the screen with someone else next to you. While it displays a wide range of colors and has decent accuracy before calibration, you still need to calibrate it for the best accuracy.

Pros
  • 4k resolution results in sharp text.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Great ergonomics.
  • High contrast ratio.
Cons
  • Narrow viewing angles.
  • Some blooming around bright objects.
  • Needs full calibration for best accuracy.
7.6
Brightness 

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 has good brightness. It gets bright enough to fight glare in a well-lit room. It also gets bright in HDR, making small highlights pop, but it can't maintain that high peak brightness with larger objects.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Small highlights pop against dark backgrounds.
Cons
  • Larger highlights don't stand out.
8.1
Response Time 

The Samsung Neo G7 has a great response time that makes motion look sharp, but it doesn't eliminate all blur. Also, there's more inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates, which can get distracting.

Pros
  • Fast response time with most refresh rates.
Cons
  • More inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates.
7.7
HDR Picture 

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 is great for HDR. It has a high contrast ratio to make blacks look deep, and the decent local dimming feature helps improve the picture quality in dark scenes, but there's still some blooming around bright objects. It also displays a wide range of colors in HDR, and it makes them look vivid.

Pros
  • Decent local dimming.
  • High contrast ratio.
  • Displays wide range of colors.
Cons
  • Some blooming around bright objects.
8.2
SDR Picture 

The Samsung Neo G7 has great picture quality in SDR. It displays a wide range of colors and has a good native contrast ratio, but there's backlight bleed in dark scenes with local dimming disabled.

Pros
  • High contrast ratio.
  • Displays wide range of colors.
Cons
  • Some blooming around bright objects.
7.9
Color Accuracy 

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 has very good color accuracy. You need to calibrate it for the best accuracy, but once you do, it has good gray uniformity that keeps the image consistently accurate over the entire screen.

Pros
  • Displays wide range of colors.
Cons
  • Needs full calibration for best accuracy.
  • 7.9
    PC Gaming
  • 8.7
    Console Gaming
  • 8.3
    Office
  • 7.9
    Editing

  • Performance Usages

  • 7.6
    Brightness
  • 8.1
    Response Time
  • 7.7
    HDR Picture
  • 8.2
    SDR Picture
  • 7.9
    Color Accuracy
  • Changelog

    1.  Updated Aug 06, 2025: 

      We checked the macOS Compatibility after updating our MacBook to Sequoia 15.5, and confirmed it reaches a 165Hz refresh rate now.

    2.  Updated Jul 23, 2025: 

      We updated text throughout to match the new and updated tests with Test Bench 2.1, including in the Verdict section.

    3.  Updated Jul 21, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.1. This includes new tests for Direct Reflections, Ambient Black Level Raise, and Total Reflected Light. You can see all the changes in the changelog.
    4.  Updated Feb 21, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0.1. This includes a new test result for DisplayPort 2.1 Transmission Bandwidth.

    Check Price

    32"Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75
    Searching
    Finding store
    32"Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75
    Searching
    Finding store
    32"Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75
    Searching
    Finding store
    32"Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75
    Searching
    Finding store
    32"Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75
    Searching
    Finding store
    32"Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75
    Searching
    Finding store

    Differences Between Sizes And Variants

    We tested the 32-inch Samsung Neo G7, which is the only size available, and the results are only valid for this model. There are other models in Samsung's Odyssey lineup that share the G7 name, but they're different monitors. They also have the higher-end Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, which is very similar to the Neo G7 but has a higher 240Hz refresh rate. You can see the differences between them below.

    SizeNameUS Model CodeResolutionRefresh RatePanel TypeMini LEDTizen OSRelease Year
    28"Odyssey G7 S28AG70LS28AG700NNXZA4k144HzIPSNoNo2021
    32"Odyssey G7 S32BG70LS32BG702ENXGO4k144HzIPSNoYes2022
    32"Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75LS32BG752NNXGO4k165HzVAYesNo2022
    32"Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85LS32BG852NNXGO4k240HzVAYesNo2022
    43"Odyssey Neo G7 S43CG70LS43CG702NNXZA4k144HzVAYesYes2023

    Our unit was manufactured in May 2022, and you can see the label here. The monitor was tested with firmware M-B7532GGZA-1009.0.

    Popular Monitor Comparisons

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 is a great gaming monitor with useful features like the 165Hz refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. Its Mini LED backlighting provides better picture quality in dark rooms than many other LED-backlit 32-inch monitors, including the LG 32GQ950-B. It's a good cheaper alternative to the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 if you don't need such a high refresh rate, but like the S32BG85, it has noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates in dark scenes. That said, this isn't so much of an issue if your PC can maintain consistent frame rates.

    Also see our recommendations for the best HDR gaming monitors, the best 4k HDR monitors, and the best 4k gaming monitors.

    Sony INZONE M9

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 is better than the Sony INZONE M9. The Samsung has a much more versatile stand, so it's easier to place it in an ideal viewing position or turn the screen to share it with someone else. The Samsung also has much better contrast, delivering deeper blacks in a dark room and less blooming around bright objects thanks to its Mini LED backlight.

    Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85 and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 are very similar monitors. They likely use the same panel as the picture quality is the same, but the main difference is that the Neo G8 has a 240Hz refresh rate, while the Neo G7 has a 165Hz refresh rate. Another difference is that the Neo G8 uses a different screen coating with much better reflection handling. However, it introduces some haziness, so if that bothers you, the Neo G7 is the better choice.

    Samsung Odyssey G7/G70B S32BG70

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 is a higher-end version of the Samsung Odyssey G7/G70B S32BG70, so it's better overall. The main difference is that the Neo G7 has a VA panel with Mini LED backlighting, resulting in a much better contrast and local dimming feature. It also gets brighter in HDR, particularly with smaller highlights. On the other hand, the G70B has better motion handling as there's less overshoot.

    Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 is a newer version of the Samsung Odyssey G7 C32G75T, and both monitors are very different. The S32BG75 has a 4k screen with HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, allowing you to play high-frame-rate games in 4k, which the C32G75T can't do. The S32BG75 also has Mini LED backlighting with a much better local dimming feature than the C32G75T. If you want a high-end 4k monitor, the S32BG75 is the better choice, but the C32G75T is better if your graphics card can't take full advantage of the 4k resolution.

    Show more 

    Test Results

    perceptual testing image
    Sort:
    RATINGS
    Category:
    All
    Design
    Style
    Curved
    Yes
    Curve Radius
    1000R

    The Samsung Neo G7 has a gamer-oriented design with a black plastic body that has a ring of zone lighting. The curve helps bring the edges of the screen more within your field of vision, but some people may also find it too aggressive.

    Accelerated Longevity Test
    Uniformity PicturesN/A
    8.0
    Build Quality

    This monitor has great build quality. It's mainly plastic that feels good, and the base of the stand is metal. The stand is easy to adjust, and it holds the screen well. There's a bit of wobble on the stand, but this is only an issue if you don't have a stable desk. Overall, it feels well-made, and there aren't any major issues of concern.

    8.3
    Ergonomics
    Min Height To Top Of Panel
    18.6" (47.2 cm)
    Height Adjustment
    4.7" (12.0 cm)
    Tilt Range
    -12.5° to 7.5°
    Rotate Portrait/Landscape
    Yes, Both Ways
    Swivel Range
    -15° to 15°
    Wall Mount
    VESA 100x100

    The ergonomics are great. You can adjust it in several ways, but its swivel range is a bit narrow, which is disappointing if you often need to turn the screen for someone next to you. The stand has a clip for cable management to route your cables to the inputs.

    Stand
    Base Width
    22.3" (56.7 cm)
    Base Depth
    12.4" (31.5 cm)
    Thickness (With Display)
    11.9" (30.1 cm)
    Weight (With Display)
    19.2 lbs (8.7 kg)

    The stand has wide-set metal feet that support the screen well, but they don't prevent all wobble. Due to the large footprint of the stand, you'll need a big desk to put it on.

    Display
    Size
    32"
    Housing Width
    28.1" (71.4 cm)
    Housing Height
    17.4" (44.2 cm)
    Thickness (Without Stand)
    7.2" (18.3 cm)
    Weight (Without Stand)
    14.3 lbs (6.5 kg)
    Borders Size (Bezels)
    0.4" (0.9 cm)
    Controls

    There's a directional pad with a power button to navigate the on-screen menu instead of the traditional joystick found on other Samsung monitors. The buttons are mushy and don't feel as convenient as the joystick, and it takes time to get used to.

    In The Box
    Power Supply
    External Brick

    • DisplayPort cable
    • USB-B to USB-A cable
    • Power supply and cable
    • VESA-mount adapter
    • User guides

    Picture Quality
    8.4
    Contrast
    Native Contrast
    3,326 : 1
    Contrast With Local Dimming
    19,238 : 1

    The Samsung Neo G7 has a high native contrast ratio that displays deep blacks next to bright highlights in dark rooms. Thanks to its Mini LED local dimming, the contrast gets much better with local dimming enabled.

    7.0
    Local Dimming
    Local Dimming
    Yes
    Backlight
    Full-Array

    This monitor has a decent Mini LED local dimming feature that has a 46x26 array with 1,196 dimming zones. With Local Dimming on 'High', HDR content looks great because small highlights pop against dark backgrounds, but it struggles to make larger highlights pop in bright scenes. There's some blooming that's more noticeable if you're viewing the screen from the sides than from in front. The blooming isn't always present, but it can be visible in some scenes, like moving the mouse against a dark background or around players in FIFA. There's some blooming around subtitles too, but it's still better than most monitors. That said, there's less blooming than on non-Mini LED monitors.

    Sadly, there's black crush in darker scenes, causing you to lose fine details. Also, the local dimming enables the Dynamic Brightness setting, which can be distracting as minimizing and maximizing windows in the desktop causes a change in brightness. The algorithm keeps up with fast-moving content well, but there's some blur trail behind fast-moving objects with it on 'High'.

    8.2
    SDR Brightness
    Real Scene
    358 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    798 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    1,129 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    920 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    540 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    308 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    790 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    1,105 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    905 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    539 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    306 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.070
    Minimum Brightness
    14 cd/m²

    The SDR peak brightness is great. With the Local Dimming on 'High', it gets bright enough to fight glare, but it has an aggressive Automatic Brightness Limiter that's distracting when you're miniziming and maximizing windows, even with Local Dimming on 'Low', but isn't so much of an issue with static content. You can either set the brightness to a really low level, or you can simply disable the local dimming to avoid an aggressive ABL, and the monitor is still bright enough to fight glare:

    • Peak 2% Window: 316 cd/m²
    • Peak 10% Window: 316 cd/m²
    • Peak 25% Window: 315 cd/m²
    • Peak 50% Window: 314 cd/m²
    • Peak 100% Window: 314 cd/m²
    • Sustained 2% Window: 316 cd/m²
    • Sustained 10% Window: 316 cd/m²
    • Sustained 25% Window: 315 cd/m²
    • Sustained 50% Window: 314 cd/m²
    • Sustained 100% Window: 313 cd/m²

    These results are from after calibration in the 'Custom' Picture Mode.

    7.2
    HDR Brightness
    VESA DisplayHDR Certification
    No Certification
    Real Scene
    416 cd/m²
    Peak 2% Window
    795 cd/m²
    Peak 10% Window
    1,101 cd/m²
    Peak 25% Window
    946 cd/m²
    Peak 50% Window
    560 cd/m²
    Peak 100% Window
    311 cd/m²
    Sustained 2% Window
    788 cd/m²
    Sustained 10% Window
    1,081 cd/m²
    Sustained 25% Window
    931 cd/m²
    Sustained 50% Window
    558 cd/m²
    Sustained 100% Window
    308 cd/m²
    Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
    0.068

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 has decent HDR peak brightness. It gets really bright with small highlights as they stand out and pop against a dark background, but it gets dimmer with larger areas of bright colors. Unfortunately, the EOTF doesn't follow the target PQ curve well, as it crushes blacks and over-brightens brighter details. However, because there's a sharp cut-off at the peak brightness, it lets your computer do any tone mapping.

    Samsung advertises Quantum HDR 2000, but this isn't a real VESA certification, and it doesn't hit 2000 nits.

    These results are in the 'Custom' Picture Mode with the Brightness at its max and Local Dimming set to 'High'. The EOTF is also similar with Local Dimming set to 'Low', as you can see here, but then the screen is dimmer.

    If you want a monitor with Mini LED backlighting that gets brighter, then look into the AOC Q27G3XMN.

    5.9
    Horizontal Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Left
    33°
    Color Washout From Right
    33°
    Color Shift From Left
    59°
    Color Shift From Right
    61°
    Brightness Loss From Left
    34°
    Brightness Loss From Right
    33°
    Black Level Raise From Left
    14°
    Black Level Raise From Right
    13°
    Gamma Shift From Left
    14°
    Gamma Shift From Right
    13°

    This monitor has a narrow horizontal viewing angle. The image looks washed out from the sides, but the curved screen helps bring the edges closer to you if you sit directly in front. If you want a 32-inch, 4k monitor with better viewing angles, look into the Acer ‎Predator X32 Fpbmiiiiphuzx.

    5.3
    Vertical Viewing Angle
    Color Washout From Below
    31°
    Color Washout From Above
    29°
    Color Shift From Below
    45°
    Color Shift From Above
    48°
    Brightness Loss From Below
    31°
    Brightness Loss From Above
    29°
    Black Level Raise From Below
    10°
    Black Level Raise From Above
    Gamma Shift From Below
    14°
    Gamma Shift From Above

    The vertical viewing angle is disappointing. The image looks washed out if you're standing up and looking down on the monitor.

    7.8
    Gray Uniformity
    50% Std. Dev.
    2.050%
    50% DSE
    0.172%

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75 has good gray uniformity. Although there's a bit of dirty screen effect in the center, it isn't too bad, and the screen looks good throughout.

    7.6
    Black Uniformity
    Native Std. Dev.
    1.156%
    Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
    0.236%

    This monitor has good black uniformity if you have the Mini LED local dimming feature enabled. It helps it display deep blacks without too much blooming around bright objects. However, the uniformity is worse without local dimming as there's backlight bleed along the top and bottom edges. If you prefer a monitor that has perfect black uniformity thanks to its OLED panel, check out the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF.

    7.4
    Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    sRGB
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    105.0%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    5.45
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,169 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.21
    Color dE (Avg.)
    3.36
    Contrast Setting
    N/A
    RGB Settings
    Default
    Gamma Setting
    Mode 1
    Brightness Setting
    100
    Measured Brightness
    310 cd/m²
    Brightness Locked
    No

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 has decent accuracy before calibration. The sRGB mode locks the colors to the sRGB space, but the white balance is off, and gamma doesn't follow the target sRGB curve well, as dark scenes are too dark and bright scenes are over-brightened. The sRGB mode locks the Contrast, Color, Black Level, and Screen Adjust settings, but not the brightness. If you want to change the other settings, you'll need to use other picture modes that are less accurate with oversaturated colors, as you can see here.

    9.6
    Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
    Picture Mode
    Custom
    sRGB Gamut Area xy
    101.0%
    White Balance dE (Avg.)
    0.49
    Color Temperature (Avg.)
    6,521 K
    Gamma (Avg.)
    2.19
    Color dE (Avg.)
    0.83
    Contrast Setting
    75
    RGB Settings
    45-50-47
    Gamma Setting
    Mode 1
    Brightness Setting
    28
    Measured Brightness
    100 cd/m²
    ICC Profile
    Download

    The accuracy after calibration is fantastic, and any remaining inaccuracies can't be spotted by the naked eye. Gamma and the color temperature are both nearly spot-on with their targets.

    9.4
    SDR Color Gamut
    sRGB Coverage xy
    99.3%
    sRGB Picture Mode
    Custom
    Adobe RGB Coverage xy
    85.1%
    Adobe RGB Picture Mode
    Custom

    This monitor has an incredible SDR color gamut. It has perfect coverage of the sRGB color space used in most web content, and it has good Adobe RGB coverage, but it undersaturates greens and oversaturates reds.

    8.0
    HDR Color Gamut
    Wide Color Gamut
    Yes
    DCI-P3 Coverage xy
    89.9%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    Custom
    Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
    67.9%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    Custom

    The Samsung Neo G7 has a great HDR color gamut. It has amazing DCI-P3 coverage, which is the common color space used in most HDR content. However, it has more limited coverage of the Rec. 2020 color space with tone mapping issues.

    Unlike past Samsung monitors, there aren't dedicated HDR picture modes like 'HDR Dynamic' or 'HDR Game', and instead the HDR picture modes are the same as in SDR, but they perform differently. You can also change picture settings like Contrast, Sharpness, and Color.

    8.2
    HDR Color Volume
    1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
    79.0%
    DCI-P3 Picture Mode
    Custom
    10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
    37.2%
    Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
    Custom

    This monitor has a great HDR color volume. It displays most dark and bright colors well.

    9.0
    Text Clarity
    Pixel Type
    VA
    Subpixel Layout
    RGB

    The text clarity is fantastic. You won't have any issues reading text, and even though Windows ClearType (top photo) helps improve the clarity, you might not need it.

    6.5
    Direct Reflections
    See details on graph tool
    Peak Direct Reflection Intensity
    31.0%
    Screen Finish
    Matte

    The direct reflection handling is okay. The matte coating spreads light out, but it still has some mirror-like reflections. It doesn't absorb light as well as the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 S32BG85, which has a more aggressive coating. Objects also look warped because of the curved screen.

    8.9
    Ambient Black Level Raise
    See details on graph tool
    Black Luminance @ 0 lx
    0.00 cd/m²
    Black Luminance @ 1000 lx
    0.45 cd/m²

    The black levels remain low in a bright room, which is excellent.

    8.0
    Total Reflected Light
    Total Reflected Light Intensity
    16,762% ⋅ pixel
    Diffraction Artifacts
    No

    There's some reflected light on this monitor in a bright room that could get distracting, but it's not the worst either. The main downside is that there's still strong glare from bright light sources, and it warps images due to its curved screen.

    9.8
    Gradient
    Color Depth
    10 Bit

    The Samsung Neo G7 has incredible gradient handling. You won't notice any banding with different shades of the same color.

    Motion
    7.5
    Refresh Rate
    Native Refresh Rate
    165 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate
    165 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    165 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    165 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
    165 Hz
    Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
    165 Hz
    DSC Toggle
    No
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over DP
    N/A
    DSC Off Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
    N/A
    Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
    Variable Refresh Rate
    Yes
    FreeSync
    Yes
    G-SYNC
    Compatible (Tested)
    VRR Maximum
    165 Hz
    VRR Minimum
    < 20 Hz
    VRR Supported Connectors
    DisplayPort, HDMI

    NVIDIAVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
    HDMI<20Hz165Hz

    AMDVRR MinVRR Max
    DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
    HDMI<20Hz165Hz

    On top of supporting FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility, this monitor also supports HDMI Forum VRR.

    8.0
    VRR Motion Performance
    See details on graph tool
    Recommended VRR OD Setting
    Adaptive-Sync
    Variable Overdrive Advertised
    No
    Avg. CAD
    155
    Best CAD
    132
    Worst CAD
    198

    The motion handling across the VRR range is great. Using VRR disables any of the overdrive settings, and while there isn't too much noticeable blur, there's more inverse ghosting at lower refresh rates, which is disappointing if your PC can't maintain a consistently high frame rate.

    7.9
    Refresh Rate Compliance
    See details on graph tool
    See details on graph tool
    Compliance @ Max Hz
    61%
    Compliance @ 120 FPS
    66%
    Compliance @ 60 FPS
    78%

    The refresh rate compliance is very good. While its response time isn't fast enough to take full advantage of its max refresh rate, it gets better at lower refresh rates.

    8.4
    CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
    OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
    od-transition-max-refresh-rate-adaptivesync-0-31
    OD adaptivesync
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Standard
    Avg. CAD
    117
    Best 10% CAD
    44
    Worst 10% CAD
    193

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
    FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
    ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto
    VRRHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at the max refresh rate is impressive. If you disable VRR you can use the overdrive settings, in which case 'Standard' has a lot less inverse ghosting than 'Faster' and 'Extreme'. However, even using VRR results in similar motion handling.

    Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Standard
    First Response Time
    3.5 ms
    Total Response Time
    6.2 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    5 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    6.3 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    12.3 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    18 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    VRRHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    8.2
    CAD @ 120Hz
    OD Transition 120Hz
    od-transition-120-adaptivesync-0-31
    OD adaptivesync
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Standard
    Avg. CAD
    132
    Best 10% CAD
    42
    Worst 10% CAD
    228

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
    FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
    ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto
    VRRHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 120Hz is great. Like at the max refresh rate, if you disable VRR, the recommended overdrive setting is 'Standard' because it has less inverse ghosting than 'Faster' and 'Extreme', but there's still a bit of noticeable blur and inverse ghosting. Motion is similar even if you enable VRR.

    Response Time @ 120Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Standard
    First Response Time
    4.5 ms
    Total Response Time
    7.4 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    4 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    9.0 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    13.7 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    18 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    VRRHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    7.9
    CAD @ 60Hz
    OD Transition 60Hz
    od-transition-60-adaptivesync-0-31
    OD adaptivesync
    0 to 31
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Standard
    Avg. CAD
    143
    Best 10% CAD
    43
    Worst 10% CAD
    280

    Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
    StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
    FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
    ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto
    VRRHeatmapChartPhoto

    The CAD at 60Hz is very good. It performs similarly to higher refresh rates as there's a bit of blur, but it isn't overly distracting either. Without VRR, the 'Standard' overdrive setting once again performs the best, and using VRR results in similar motion handling.

    Response Time @ 60Hz
    Recommended Overdrive Setting
    Standard
    First Response Time
    6.4 ms
    Total Response Time
    6.5 ms
    RGB Overshoot
    0 RGB
    Worst 10% First Response Time
    16.8 ms
    Worst 10% Total Response Time
    16.8 ms
    Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
    2 RGB

    Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
    StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
    VRRHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    Yes
    Maximum Frequency
    165 Hz
    Minimum Frequency
    120 Hz
    Longest Pulse Width Brightness
    235 cd/m²
    Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
    235 cd/m²
    Pulse Width Control
    No
    Pulse Phase Control
    No
    Pulse Amplitude Control
    No
    VRR At The Same Time
    No

    Refresh RatePursuit Photo
    165HzPhoto
    120HzPhoto

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 has an optional backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion. It only works properly within a narrow range and there's flicker below 120Hz. Enabling the feature also locks the VRR and local dimming features. The pulse phase isn't matched up to the refresh rate, so the timing is constantly shifting, which means there's noticeable image duplication at times, and it looks better at other times. The BFI features also locks the brightness setting, but if you set the brightness before enabling the BFI, it stays on that brightness.

    5.7
    VRR Flicker
    Dark Gray Flicker
    3.8 RGB
    Middle Gray Flicker
    2.0 RGB
    Light Gray Flicker
    1.7 RGB

    Unfortunately, there's noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates. It's distracting in both dark and bright scenes, but this isn't so much of an issue if you have a consistent frame rate. Samsung added a VRR Control setting to eliminate this flicker. Using it can improve the flicker, but it also increases input lag, so the best way to avoid this flicker is by using a consistent frame rate.

    10
    Image Flicker
    Flicker-Free
    Yes
    PWM Dimming Frequency
    >1000 Hz

    The Samsung Neo G7 has a flicker-free backlight with the brightness at higher levels, which helps reduce eye strain. With the local dimming disabled, the flicker starts with the brightness set to '10' or lower, and the flicker is high enough that you won't notice it. However, the pulse width modulation (PWM) behaves differently with the local dimming enabled. With the brightness at '19', it flickers at 240Hz, and the flicker fluctuates as the brightness goes down until it's at 165Hz with the brightness at '0'. This flicker is more noticeable as you lower the brightness, so if a bright screen doesn't bother you, it's best to leave it at high brightness, especially if you have local dimming enabled. You can see the flicker chart with the Local Dimming on 'High' here.

    Another issue is with scanlines. Scanlines are most noticeable with test patterns, like patterns 2a and 2b from Lagom. You can see an example of the scanlines in the green section here and you can also see it more clearly with a zoomed-in image here. Other test patterns cause the scanlines, and you can see an image of what the scanlines look like here. This video is a good example to see the scanlines and flicker issues in the green section with the Local Dimming set to 'High', VRR enabled, VRR Control off, and the Brightness at '100'. Keep in mind that these scanlines are most noticeable with test patterns, and they're hard to see and rarely happen with real content. If you notice them, lowering the Sharpness can help reduce the issue, but it doesn't completely fix it.

    Inputs
    8.9
    Input Lag
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz
    4.0 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz
    5.1 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz
    9.1 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI)
    4.3 ms

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 has low input lag for a responsive feel when gaming. Unlike past Samsung monitors, the input lag doesn't increase when the frame rate of your source drops below the set refresh rate of the monitor. Unfortunately, the VRR Control setting increases the input lag, as you can see below:

    SettingVRR Control OnVRR Control OffLocal Dimming
    165 fps10.8 ms4.3 ms4.8 ms
    120 fps15.4 ms5.2 ms5.8 ms
    60 fps23 ms9.1 ms9.7 ms

    8.5
    Resolution
    Native Resolution
    3840 x 2160
    Aspect Ratio
    16:9
    Megapixels
    8.3 MP
    Pixel Density
    138 PPI
    10
    PS5 Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    Yes
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 is fully compatible with the PS5 thanks to its HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. Both the 'PC' and 'AV' modes in the monitor's OSD perform the same, and neither have an impact on text clarity. The 'AV' modes lock you out of the regular Picture Modes available, including sRGB, while you can still use those modes in the 'PC' mode.

    10
    Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
    4k @ 120Hz
    Yes
    4k @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1440p @ 60Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 120Hz
    Yes
    1080p @ 60Hz
    Yes

    The Samsung Neo G7 is fully compatible with the Xbox Series X|S. Keep in mind that the Xbox doesn't support HDR with 1080p or 1440p signals, so this isn't an issue with the monitor.

    Inputs
    DisplayPort
    1 (DP 1.4)
    DisplayPort Transmission Bandwidth
    No DisplayPort 2.1
    Mini DisplayPort
    No
    HDMI
    2 (HDMI 2.1)
    HDMI 2.1 Bandwidth
    40Gbps (FRL 10x4)
    Daisy Chaining
    No
    3.5mm Audio Out
    Yes
    Ethernet
    No
    HDR10
    Yes
    Dolby Vision
    No
    USB
    USB-A Ports
    2
    USB-A Rated Speed
    5Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen 1)
    USB-B Upstream Port
    Yes
    USB-C Ports
    0
    USB-C Upstream
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Rated Speed
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C Power Delivery
    No USB-C Ports
    USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
    No USB-C Ports
    Thunderbolt
    No

    It doesn't have a USB-C input but if you want a similar 4k monitor that does, then look into the Cooler Master Tempest GP27U.

    macOS Compatibility

    Tested with: M3 MacBook Pro (Sequoia 15.5)

    ConnectionHDMI 2.1USB-C to DP
    Max Refresh Rate165Hz165Hz
    VRR Range48-165Hz48-165Hz
    HDRYesYes

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 works well with macOS. You can reach the max refresh rate with any connection, but you may need to update your Mac's operating system to reach it. Unfortunately, there's noticeable flicker with the VRR Control setting disabled. Enabling it eliminates this flicker, but it also increases the input lag. HDR looks okay, as highlights pop, but some colors look a bit washed out. Also, windows return to their original position after the monitor goes to sleep when using a MacBook, but they don't if you close the laptop lid.

    Features
    Additional Features
    Speakers
    No
    RGB Illumination
    Controllable
    Multiple Input Display
    PIP
    KVM Switch
    No
    Smart OS
    No

    The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 has a few extra features to improve your gaming experience, like:

    • Black Equalizer: Adjusts the gamma so that you can see opponents better in dark areas of games.
    • Dynamic Brightness: Brightens the screen on a scene-by-scene basis. Automatically enabled with Local Dimming on.
    • Eco Light Sensor: Changes the brightness of the screen according to the ambient environment.
    • Eye Care: Removes blue light to help with eye strain.
    • Infinity Core Lighting: Controls the lighting on the stand, and can sync with the on-screen colors.
    • Ultrawide Game View: Displays an ultrawide 21:9 image, with black bars at the top and bottom.
    • Virtual Aim Point: Displays a crosshair that your system won't detect.

    On-Screen Display (OSD)

    Comments

    1. Product

    Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75: Main Discussion

    Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product.

    PreviewBack to editorFormat guide
    Sort by:
    newest first
    1. We’ve just released a new video that mentions the Sony BRAVIA 5 here.

    2. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      Let me just say that I have a Bravia KDL 55W809C from 2015. It still works perfectly and it’s great, but my concern that it might break makes me think about buying a new model… I was considering the Bravia 5 from 65 but according to Rtings the ratings have been disastrous compared to the Bravia 7 and honestly I didn’t expect that… I’ve never used HDR and I don’t think I ever will… What do you recommend? i have direct light

    3. 1
      0
      -1
      1
      -1

      I’m extremely disappointed with my Sony Bravia 9 TV (Model K-85XR90), purchased from Reliance Digital in Hyderabad, India, just 9 months ago. Despite being under Sony’s standard one-year warranty, the TV has been completely unresponsive, like a dead duck, for over 15 days which is under Sony service/repair. The Sony authorized service center technical team diagnosed thrice to confirm critical component failures, including main board and power board, issues without identifying and confirming external causes. After replacing the main board and power board, the TV switched on with a display, but Wi-Fi settings and connectivity issues persisted. Further diagnosis is required to resolve the connectivity problem. Given the replacement of two critical components during the warranty period and the persistence of Wi-Fi issues, I strongly believe that the TV is defective. Given the recurring issues, it’s likely that further glitches and performance problems will arise going forward, underscoring the need for a more comprehensive solution. The complete lack of response from Sony India and the authorized service center is forcing me to consider accepting the same TV repaired by them. Throughout the authorized technical team’s multiple attempts to diagnose the TV, I observed that the TV was handled with inadequate care. I mentioned this in my previous communication. During the third repair attempt, the team spent an hour struggling to remove a back panel screw due to improper fixation, resulting in damage to the screw and partial damage to the back panel. Additionally, the display panel was left with fingerprints and dirt, indicating inadequate care and attention to detail. Hence, I requested that Sony India replace the defective TV with a new unit under standard warranty terms. Having closely observed and inspected the internals, I have concerns regarding potential quality control issues, may be linked to cost-cutting initiatives that compromise the product’s integrity, resulting in defective units or a broader manufacturing problem, IMHO. Given the premium pricing and “cinema is coming home” tagline promise seems hollow given this flagship model, like the Sony Bravia 9 TV, fails so catastrophically within the Sony standard warranty period. This incident raises serious concerns, questions about Sony’s quality standards and the reliability of their other TV models…? As a long-standing Sony loyalist, I’m dismayed by the subpar customer support, and service levels exhibited by Sony India throughout this process. This falls short of the exceptional standards I’ve come to expect from Sony globally. I’ve attempted to escalate this issue to Sony Global Headquarters, hoping for a more satisfactory and comprehensive resolution, but I await further response.

    4. 4
      3
      2
      3
      0

      Just curious if anyone who owns this tv, did you get a firmware update recently?? I went back in to my local BB and after changing the settings on the X90L and Bravia 5 which are side by side, the Bravia 5 looked much much better than the last time I went in there and looked at it. The X90L still had some slightly brighter highlights, but the color and blooming looked substantially better on the Bravia 5.

      Anyone??

    5. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      I come from a Sony KDL55W809C (10 years in November) and I will either get this Bravia 5 or the 65-inch Bravia 7… I am someone who focuses a lot on energy savings; I look for the best performance/energy consumption ratio. I don’t use HDR (also because I don’t have it and I’m fine without it) also because I’ve seen it on Sony OLEDs and it doesn’t change much… Would you not recommend this? My old TV consumes 75 Watts, this one at 65 inches consumes 65 Watts, the TCL reaches 120 with HDR exceeding 200… You understand that I’m almost compelled to take either this one which has an HDR consumption of 90 or the Bravia 7 at 109… I also have a bright room with direct light sources, what do you recommend?

    6. 3
      2
      1
      2
      0

      I guess this is Sony’s way of making sure this tier remains separate from the Bravia 7 and Bravia 9. The Bravia 8 II being inferior to the A95L might be their way of getting rid of the A95L in order for the Bravia 9 to become their flagship. I didn’t like how they replaced the A80L with the Bravia 8 2024 model either. I thought the way they approached things in 2023 with the X90L and A95L, and in 2024 with the Bravia 7 and Bravia 9 was the best they’ve done with their most recent full-array local dimming, mini-QLED, and QD-OLED models. Unless the Bravia 5 can do something that the Hisense U6, Hisense U7, TCL QM6K, and TCL QM7K can’t do, I can’t justify paying double or tripple for the Bravia 5 for the same results. I actually enjoyed researching which TV I was going to choose as my first 4K TV back in 2023, as well as my post-purchase research in 2024, which led me back to the X90L I purchased in 2023, which was still being manufactured and was still selling strong. Yet technology is supposed to move forward. So based on how great the X90L and A95L are, I was having high hopes for the direction Sony would take in 2025. However, as an X90L owner and as someone who is dreaming of being able to afford the A95L some time in the future, I am quite disappointed with the direction Sony went in with this tier, as well as their QD-OLED model. I have an extended Costco warranty. So if mine needs a warranty replacement once the X90L sells out, this would force me to decide whether to take a Bravia 5 so I wouldn’t have to pay more, or pay the difference for a Bravia 7. A95L owners would unfortunately be in a similar situation in the event THEY ALSO need a warranty replacement once the A95L sells out. Should they take a Bravia 8 II, a Bravia 9, or a Samsung QD-OLED and give up Dolby Vision? Sony should have at least stuck with what made the X90L great, changed the GUI, added support for Dolby Vision gaming at 120 Hz, and maybe used brighter LEDs. Unless I’m missing something, I hope Rtings’s Youtubers strongly discourage everyone from considering the Bravia 5.

      Funny, I have almost the exact same feelings!! Except I don’t have an X90L. It’s pretty clear to me now after 3 years of researching closely, the Bravia 9 is really the only true “best mini led”. No tv is perfect, it just kills me that for the price of one 85” Bravia 9, I can get an 85” QN90D and a 77” S95D and STILL have $$ left over.

    7. 2
      1
      0
      1
      0

      MOTION on this TV is Great When Setting CLEARNESS all the way up it Gets rid of all MOTION issues in fast moving LIGHT scenes which is 96% of what we watch Smoothness can be put all the way up with CLEARNESS as it Doesn’t interfere when IMAGES are Transitioning from LIGHT to DARK to LIGHT to DARK ect ect = IMAGE SCENES = Movements So I’m not sure how your doing you testing but it needs to change - Thanks

      The motion interpolation settings have nothing to do with pixel response time. The motion tests CAD in game mode and response time test the panels physical capability of displaying motion by changing color fast and accurately which this TV like all LCD TVs is not the best at. LCD panels are just slow compared to OLEDs which is exposed in fast motion.

      The motion settings you are talking about are tested in the categories BFI(black frame insert) and motion interpolation. Those are about the quality of the software, to what extent the tv can improve the motion quality of thre source.

      Like on pretty much every other Sony TV with the XR processor those settings dont work the best. The clarity setting controls backlight strobing and the smoothness setting frame interpolation. Both at maximum looks nothing other than atrocious to me.

      The interpolation is very artificial and introduces heavy artifacts when put to 3, I use only min or 1 on my Sony. The backlight strobing caused by the clarity setting causes image duplication on all current sony lcds and does not improve the picture, in fact I get a migraine after 2-3 mins of that. Those observations are in line with rtings test results on this and most other tvs. Rtings recommended settings for motion on XR/X1 Sonys is Cinemotion on High and motion clarity+smoothness both on min. This works the best for me as well.

      Edited 1 month ago: typo
    8. 1
      0
      -1
      2
      -2

      MOTION on this TV is Great When Setting CLEARNESS all the way up it Gets rid of all MOTION issues in fast moving LIGHT scenes which is 96% of what we watch Smoothness can be put all the way up with CLEARNESS as it Doesn’t interfere when IMAGES are Transitioning from LIGHT to DARK to LIGHT to DARK ect ect = IMAGE SCENES = Movements

      So I’m not sure how your doing you testing but it needs to change - Thanks