Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
We've recently released Test Bench 2.0 for Monitors! Read our new VRR Flicker R&D Article and Pursuit Photo R&D Article to learn more.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v2.0
Review updated Aug 01, 2024 at 12:00 pm
Latest change: Writing modified Sep 26, 2024 at 10:19 am
Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 Picture
6.8
PC Gaming
6.1
Console Gaming
7.5
Office
7.1
Editing
6.3
Brightness
6.3
Response Time
5.0
HDR Picture
8.2
SDR Picture
7.7
Color Accuracy

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 is an entry-level gaming monitor. It has a 1440p resolution and 27-inch screen size, and it's also available in a 32-inch model in various regions. As a part of Samsung's Odyssey gaming lineup, it's an updated model of the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55A S27AG55, with the main difference being that it has a flat screen. It's designed with gaming in mind, as it has a 165Hz refresh rate with FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility, and it supports HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.2 bandwidth. Besides that, it's limited in extra features, but it supports HDR and has some gaming perks, like a virtual crosshair and a Black Equalizer feature.

Our Verdict

6.8 PC Gaming

The Samsung Odyssey G51C is okay for PC gaming. It has a 165Hz refresh rate with VRR support to reduce screen tearing and low input lag for a responsive feel. However, fast-moving objects are blurry due to the slow response time. It also has a good native contrast ratio to display deep blacks against bright objects, but it lacks a local dimming feature to further improve it. It also fails to make highlights pop in HDR, and colors look muted.

Pros
  • FreeSync VRR and G-SYNC compatibility.
  • Low input lag.
  • High native contrast ratio.
Cons
  • Blurry motion due to slow response time.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
  • No local dimming feature.
6.1 Console Gaming

The Samsung Odyssey G51C is mediocre for console gaming. It can't take full advantage of gaming consoles due to the lack of HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, but it doesn't have any compatibility issues with the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S. It also has low input lag for a responsive feel, but it has a slow response time that results in blurry motion. In terms of picture quality, it has a good native contrast ratio, making blacks look fairly deep, but it lacks a local dimming feature to further improve it, and highlights don't pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Low input lag.
  • High native contrast ratio.
Cons
  • Blurry motion due to slow response time.
  • Limited to HDMI 2.0 bandwidth.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
7.5 Office

The Samsung Odyssey G51C is good for office use. It has good text clarity, and the 27-inch screen is big enough to open two windows side by side. It also handles reflections well enough to reduce glare from a few lights around your workspace, but it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare, like if you place it opposite a bright window. While it has fantastic ergonomics and is easy to adjust, its narrow viewing angles are disappointing if you need to often share your screen with someone else, as they'll see a washed-out image from the sides.

Pros
  • Sharp text clarity.
  • Fantastic ergonomics.
  • Good reflection handling.
Cons
  • Not bright enough to fight intense glare.
  • Limited in extra features.
7.1 Editing

The Samsung Odyssey G51C is decent for content creation. Its accuracy before calibration is just okay, as there are issues with the white balance, so it needs a full calibration for the most accurate image. Unfortunately, though, it has limited picture quality as it has a low contrast ratio, and it fails to display a wide range of colors in HDR. On the plus side, the fantastic ergonomics make it easy to adjust the screen to your liking, but with narrow viewing angles, it's difficult to share your screen with a coworker or client as they'll see a washed-out image from the sides.

Pros
  • Sharp text clarity.
  • Fantastic ergonomics.
  • Good reflection handling.
  • High native contrast ratio.
Cons
  • Not bright enough to fight intense glare.
  • Limited in extra features.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
  • Needs calibration for most accurate colors.
6.3 Brightness

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has unremarkable brightness. It's fine if you want to use it in a room with a few lights around, but it doesn't get bright enough to fight intense glare or for highlights to pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Still bright enough for moderately lit rooms.
Cons
  • Not bright enough to fight intense glare.
  • Highlights don't pop in HDR.
6.3 Response Time

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has a mediocre response time. Fast-moving objects look blurry, and there's noticeable smearing.

Pros
Cons
  • Blurry motion due to slow response time.
5.0 HDR Picture

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has disappointing HDR picture quality. While it has a good native contrast ratio, it lacks a local dimming feature to further improve it. It also fails to make colors look vivid in HDR.

Pros
  • High native contrast ratio.
Cons
  • No local dimming feature.
  • Colors are muted in HDR.
8.2 SDR Picture

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has great SDR picture quality. It displays a wide range of colors, and it has a good native contrast ratio to display fairly deep blacks in dark rooms.

Pros
  • High native contrast ratio.
  • Displays a wide range of colors.
Cons
7.7 Color Accuracy

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has good color accuracy, but you need to calibrate it for the best accuracy. This is because it lacks a dedicated sRGB mode, and colors aren't accurate before calibration.

Pros
  • Excellent gray uniformity.
Cons
  • Needs calibration for most accurate colors.
  • 6.8 PC Gaming
  • 6.1 Console Gaming
  • 7.5 Office
  • 7.1 Editing

Performance Usages

  • 6.3 Brightness
  • 6.3 Response Time
  • 5.0 HDR Picture
  • 8.2 SDR Picture
  • 7.7 Color Accuracy
  1. Updated Sep 26, 2024: Added that the Samsung Odyssey G5/G50D S27DG50 has better SDR Brightness.
  2. Updated Aug 01, 2024: Updated text throughout the review according to Test Bench 2.0, mainly in the Verdict and Motion sections.
  3. Updated Jul 26, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0. This includes new tests for VRR Motion Performance, Refresh Rate Compliance, Cumulative Absolute Deviation (CAD), and VRR Flicker. You can read the full changelog here.
  4. Updated Jun 26, 2024: Added that the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx is an alternative monitor with Local Dimming.
  5. Updated Nov 30, 2023: Added that the Gigabyte GS27QC has a faster Response Time at its max refresh rate.
  6. Updated Nov 15, 2023: Clarified that there's a 32-inch model available in Variants and added its model code.
  7. Updated Aug 10, 2023: Review published.
  8. Updated Aug 07, 2023: Early access published.
  9. Updated Jul 31, 2023: Our testers have started testing this product.
  10. Updated Jul 11, 2023: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
  11. Updated Jun 23, 2023: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the 27-inch Samsung Odyssey G51C, which is also available in a 32-inch size and performs the same. Released in 2023, it's an updated version of past Odyssey G5 models, like the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55A S27AG55, but the results are only valid for this monitor.

Model Full Code Size(s) Panel Type Max Refresh Rate Resolution
S27CG51 LS27CG512ENXZA 27" VA 165Hz 1440p
S32CG51 LS32CG512ENXZA 32" VA 165Hz 1440p

Our unit was manufactured in March 2023; you can see the label here.

Compared To Other Monitors

The Samsung Odyssey G51C is an okay entry-level PC gaming monitor that competes against other 1440p gaming displays, but it doesn't offer anything special. Although its good native contrast ratio is useful for dark room gaming, it lacks a local dimming feature to further improve it. However, it has blurry motion, and you can get other budget-friendly displays with better motion handling, like the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 or the AOC Q27G3XMN, which has better picture quality.

See our recommendations for the best budget and cheap gaming monitors, the best 1440p gaming monitors, and the best gaming monitors under $300.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G50D S27DG50

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G50D S27DG50 are 27-inch 1440p gaming monitors. The G51C is a better option if you're gaming in a dark room, as deep blacks look darker. The G50D is a better option in a bright environment as it's much better at overcoming glare.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are both 27-inch gaming monitors. Despite the G5/G51C being marketed as a lower-end monitor, it has better gaming performance. The G5/G51C has a substantially better response time, so fast-moving objects look crisper, and the monitor has considerably lower latency. The G5/G51C also has better ergonomics, so placing it in your preferred position for a long gaming session is easier. However, the G5/G55C gets considerably brighter, and you may prefer it if you're regularly gaming in a brighter room.

LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B

The LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 are both low-cost 1440p gaming monitors, but there are a few differences. The LG is better for most gamers as it has a much faster response time, leading to sharper motion, and it has an overclock for a slightly higher 180Hz refresh rate. The LG also has two USB-A ports to connect your peripherals. Lastly, while the LG is better for use in well-lit rooms thanks to its higher peak brightness, the Samsung is better for dark rooms, as it has a higher contrast ratio.

Dell S3222DGM

The Dell S3222DGM and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 are both entry-level 1440p gaming monitors, but the Dell has a larger 32-inch screen. Although they have the same panel type, there are some differences as the Dell has better motion handling and also gets brighter, making it a better choice for well-lit rooms. However, the Samsung has a few other advantages, like the fact that it can downscale 4k images from consoles, resulting in a more detailed image than native 1440p, and this is something the Dell can't do. The Samsung also supports HDR, unlike the Dell, but it doesn't add much in terms of performance anyway. Lastly, the Samsung is easier to place in an ideal position thanks to its better ergonomics.

Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 and the Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 are both gaming monitors with a 165Hz refresh rate, but there are a few differences. They have different panel types, with the S27CG51 having a higher contrast ratio and the S27AG50 having wider viewing angles. The S27AG50 also has much better motion handling and even gets brighter, making it the better choice if you want to use it in a well-lit room.

Gigabyte GS27QC

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 and the Gigabyte GS27QC are both entry-level gaming monitors with similar specs, but they have a few differences. They each have a 27-inch, 1440p screen, but the Gigabyte is curved to bring the edges closer to you. The Gigabyte also has an advantage for gaming thanks to its better motion handling. On the other hand, the Samsung is better for sharing your screen with someone, as it has better ergonomics.

Samsung Odyssey G5 C27G55T

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 is a newer model than the Samsung Odyssey G5 C27G55T, with a few differences. The S27CG51 has a flat screen compared to the curved screen on the C27G55T and has a slightly higher 165Hz refresh rate. While they both have blurry motion, the S27CG51 does have a faster overall response time. Lastly, the S27CG51 has a different stand with more ergonomic adjustments, making it easier to place in an ideal position than the C27G55T.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G55A S27AG55

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 is a newer model than the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55A S27AG55, with a few improvements. The S27CG51 has a flat screen instead of the curved screen on the S27AG55, and its stand offers much better ergonomics, making it easier to place in an ideal viewing position. The S27CG51 also has a faster response time, but the monitor's motion handling is still limited. On the other hand, the S27AG55 supports DisplayPort 1.4 bandwidth, while the S27CG51 is limited to DisplayPort 1.2 bandwidth, meaning you can reach the S27AG55's max refresh rate even when playing 10-bit games in HDR.

AOC CQ27G2

The AOC CQ27G2 and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 are both entry-level 1440p gaming monitors with a few similarities. The Samsung has a slightly higher refresh rate, but motion handling is similar between each. The Samsung has better reflection handling and gets a bit brighter, making it a slightly better choice for use in well-lit rooms. The Samsung also supports HDR, which the AOC doesn't, and it has swivel adjustment, making it easier to place in an ideal position.

Gigabyte G32QC

The Gigabyte G32QC and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 are gaming monitors with similar specs. Each has a 1440p resolution and 165Hz refresh rate, but the Gigabyte has a slightly larger 32-inch screen. The main differences come down to their picture quality, as the Gigabyte displays a wider range of colors and gets brighter, making it a better choice to use in a well-lit room. On the other hand, the main advantage of the Samsung has much better ergonomics, making it easier to place in an ideal position.

Gigabyte G27QC

The Gigabyte G27QC and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 are both entry-level 1440p gaming monitors with a 27-inch screen. They use the same panel type, so there are many similarities in performance, like with their contrast and motion handling, but the Gigabyte gets brighter, making it the better choice for a well-lit room. However, the Samsung has better ergonomics, making it easier to place in an ideal position.

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0)

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) is a better budget-friendly gaming monitor than the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51. The Gigabyte has much better motion handling thanks to its faster response time, and it has a few extra features like a USB hub, including a USB-C port. The Gigabyte is also better for everyday use, like if you want to use it in a well-lit room, as it gets brighter and displays a wider range of more accurate colors. The Samsung has an advantage if you want to use it in a dark room because it has a better contrast ratio. The Samsung also has better ergonomics, making placing it in an ideal position easier.

Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx

The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx is a better 1440p gaming monitor than the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51. The Acer uses a different panel type with better motion handling, and it has a few extra features like a USB hub. The Acer also gets brighter, making it a better choice to use in a well-lit room, and it has wider viewing angles that are ideal if you need to share the screen with someone else. On the other hand, the Samsung is better for use in dark rooms thanks to its superior contrast ratio for deeper blacks.

Dell S2722DGM

The Dell S2722DGM and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 are both good gaming monitors, with a few differences. The Dell has a curved screen compared to the flat screen on the Samsung, and the Dell doesn't support HDR either. The Dell is better to use in a well-lit room as it gets brighter, while the Samsung is better for console gaming as it downscales 4k signals, which the Dell doesn't do.

+ Show more

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved
No
Curve Radius
Not Curved

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has a gamer-oriented aesthetic with etched lines on the back. There's a blue ring where the stand attaches to the back, but it doesn't feature RGB lighting like on other monitors.

7.0
Design
Build Quality

The build quality is decent. While there isn't anything that stands out as being poorly made, the plastic materials don't feel premium, and the bottom bezel isn't perfectly flush with the entire screen either. The screen wobbles on the stand, and it can be hard to remove the stand from the screen, but that's only an issue if you need to mount it anyways.

9.0
Design
Ergonomics
Min Height To Top Of Panel
15.3" (38.8 cm)
Height Adjustment
4.7" (11.9 cm)
Tilt Range
-22.5° to 5°
Rotate Portrait/Landscape
Yes, Clockwise
Swivel Range
-30° to 30°
Wall Mount
VESA 100x100

This monitor has fantastic ergonomics, as you can adjust it in many ways. Since you can only rotate it into portrait mode in one direction, the bottom-facing inputs will always be facing to the left when rotated, as you can see here. The back of the stand also features a clip for cable management.

Design
Stand
Base Width
18.0" (45.8 cm)
Base Depth
8.6" (21.9 cm)
Thickness (With Display)
6.5" (16.4 cm)
Weight (With Display)
10.4 lbs (4.7 kg)
Design
Display
Size
27"
Housing Width
24.3" (61.7 cm)
Housing Height
15.0" (38.0 cm)
Thickness (Without Stand)
2.9" (7.4 cm)
Weight (Without Stand)
7.2 lbs (3.3 kg)
Borders Size (Bezels)
0.2" (0.6 cm)
Design
Controls

There's a single joystick underneath the center of the monitor to control the on-screen display.

Design
In The Box
Power Supply
External Brick

  • DisplayPort cable
  • HDMI cable
  • Power supply
  • Power cord
  • User guides

Picture Quality
7.7
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
2,734 : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
N/A

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has a good native contrast ratio to display fairly deep blacks next to bright highlights in dark rooms. However, it lacks a local dimming feature to further improve it.

0
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
No
Backlight
Edge

The Samsung G51C doesn't have a local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can compare the backlight performance with a monitor that has local dimming. If you want a 1440p monitor that does have local dimming, look into the Acer Nitro XV275U P3biipx.

6.8
Picture Quality
SDR Brightness
Real Scene
242 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
249 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
250 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
250 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
250 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
250 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
249 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
250 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
250 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
250 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
249 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000
Minimum Brightness
42 cd/m²

The SDR brightness is alright. Its brightness is consistent across different content, which is fantastic, and while it doesn't get extremely bright, it's still fine if you have a few lights around. However, it struggles in bright environments, like if you place it opposite a bright window. These results are from after calibration in the 'Custom' Picture Mode with the Brightness at its max. If you're looking for a monitor that gets brighter, check out the Samsung Odyssey G5/G50D S27DG50.

5.9
Picture Quality
HDR Brightness
VESA DisplayHDR Certification
No Certification
Real Scene
279 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
295 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
296 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
297 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
297 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
297 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
295 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
296 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
296 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
297 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
296 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000

The HDR brightness is disappointing. Without a local dimming feature, small highlights don't pop against the rest of the image, as they're dull and muted. It doesn't follow the target PQ EOTF either, as it severely darkens images. These results are in the HDR Standard mode with the Brightness at its max.

6.3
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
34°
Color Washout From Right
34°
Color Shift From Left
70°
Color Shift From Right
70°
Brightness Loss From Left
43°
Brightness Loss From Right
43°
Black Level Raise From Left
20°
Black Level Raise From Right
22°
Gamma Shift From Left
11°
Gamma Shift From Right
11°

This monitor has a narrow horizontal viewing angle. Images look washed out and darker from the sides, so it isn't ideal for sharing your screen with others.

5.7
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
26°
Color Washout From Above
28°
Color Shift From Below
57°
Color Shift From Above
57°
Brightness Loss From Below
30°
Brightness Loss From Above
32°
Black Level Raise From Below
19°
Black Level Raise From Above
21°
Gamma Shift From Below
11°
Gamma Shift From Above
14°

The vertical viewing angle is disappointing. The image looks washed out at wide angles, so you won't see a consistent image if you stand up and look down at the monitor.

8.6
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
1.959%
50% DSE
0.122%

The gray uniformity is excellent. While some of the edges are a bit darker, the screen is uniform throughout, and there aren't any noticeable issues.

8.5
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
0.748%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
N/A

The black uniformity is excellent. While it doesn't have a local dimming feature to further improve the black levels, there isn't much noticeable blooming around bright objects.

6.9
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Custom
sRGB Gamut Area xy
100.5%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
7.86
Color Temperature (Avg.)
8,063 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.16
Color dE (Avg.)
4.95
Contrast Setting
70
RGB Settings
50-50-50
Gamma Setting
Mode 1
Brightness Setting
100
Measured Brightness
294 cd/m²
Brightness Locked
No

The accuracy before calibration is alright. Although Samsung advertises that it has a dedicated sRGB mode, it isn't available in the list of Picture Modes, as you can see here and here. While colors are still locked to the sRGB color space, most colors are still inaccurate with a cold temperature, meaning they have a blue tint. The white balance is also awful, and gamma follows a 2.2 target instead of sRGB, so dark scenes are too dark, while bright scenes are slightly overbrightened.

9.0
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Custom
sRGB Gamut Area xy
99.7%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
0.58
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,539 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.19
Color dE (Avg.)
3.61
Contrast Setting
70
RGB Settings
42-41-41
Gamma Setting
Mode 3
Brightness Setting
24
Measured Brightness
100 cd/m²
ICC Profile
Download

This monitor has remarkable accuracy after calibration. A full two-point calibration fixes most issues, especially with the white balance and gamma, but some colors are still slightly inaccurate.

8.6
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB Coverage xy
95.2%
sRGB Picture Mode
Custom
Adobe RGB Coverage xy
75.4%
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Custom

The SDR color gamut is excellent. It has near-full coverage of the common sRGB color space, but it's a bit inaccurate as reds and greens are oversaturated while blues are undersaturated. It also has limited coverage of the Adobe RGB color space, which is disappointing for professional photo editors and publishers.

5.7
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
No
DCI-P3 Coverage xy
73.5%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
HDR Standard
Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
52.9%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
HDR Standard

The HDR color gamut is disappointing. It doesn't display the wide range of colors needed for HDR content in either the DCI-P3 or Rec. 2020 color spaces, and it struggles with tone mapping, so most colors are inaccurate.

5.9
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
44.7%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
HDR Standard
10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
19.1%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
HDR Standard

The Samsung Odyssey G51C has a disappointing HDR color volume. It struggles to display colors as bright as pure white, and it also struggles with dark colors.

7.5
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Pixel Type
VA
Subpixel Layout
RGB

The text clarity is good. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) helps improve the clarity with diagonal lines, but straight lines aren't as bold. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see it in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off.

7.5
Picture Quality
Reflections
Screen Finish
Matte
Total Reflections
5.8%
Indirect Reflections
3.8%
Calculated Direct Reflections
1.9%

The reflection handling is good. It's fine if you have a few lights around, but the glare can be distracting if you place it opposite a bright window.

9.3
Picture Quality
Gradient
Color Depth
10 Bit

The gradient handling is fantastic. While there's some banding with darker colors, it's hard to see with most content.

Motion
7.5
Motion
Refresh Rate
Native Refresh Rate
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
144 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
120 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
60 Hz
Motion
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
FreeSync
Yes
G-SYNC
Compatible (Tested)
VRR Maximum
165 Hz
VRR Minimum
< 20 Hz
VRR Supported Connectors
DisplayPort, HDMI

NVIDIAVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
HDMIN/AN/A

AMDVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
HDMI<20Hz144Hz

6.2
Motion
VRR Motion Performance
Recommended VRR OD Setting
FreeSync Premium (Extreme)
Variable Overdrive Advertised
No
Avg. CAD
270
Best CAD
229
Worst CAD
382

Refresh RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
164HeatmapChartPhoto
144HeatmapChartPhoto
120HeatmapChartPhoto
100HeatmapChartPhoto
80HeatmapChartPhoto
60HeatmapChartPhoto

This monitor has mediocre motion handling across its VRR range. Motion looks blurry, and there's noticeable ghosting, especially as the refresh rate drops. Using VRR locks the overdrive settings, but it uses the last used setting, and motion handling is the same with VRR enabled or disabled.

6.8
Motion
Refresh Rate Compliance
Compliance @ Max Hz
46%
Compliance @ 120 FPS
54%
Compliance @ 60 FPS
69%

The refresh rate compliance is okay. Its response time isn't fast enough to make full color transitions before the monitor draws the next frame at its max refresh rate, but it's better at lower refresh rates, like at 60Hz.

6.2
Motion
CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
FreeSync (Extreme)
Avg. CAD
230
Best 10% CAD
89
Worst 10% CAD
558

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at the max refresh rate of 165Hz is mediocre. There's noticeable blur and smearing with fast-moving objects, even with the 'Extreme' overdrive setting.

Motion
Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
FreeSync (Extreme)
First Response Time
9.7 ms
Total Response Time
11.5 ms
RGB Overshoot
3 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
25.7 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
25.7 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
11 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

6.4
Motion
CAD @ 120Hz
OD Transition 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
FreeSync (Extreme)
Avg. CAD
237
Best 10% CAD
110
Worst 10% CAD
473

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 120Hz is mediocre. Like at the max refresh rate, there's blur and smearing with the 'Extreme' overdrive setting, which has the fastest response time.

Motion
Response Time @ 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
FreeSync (Extreme)
First Response Time
7.8 ms
Total Response Time
12.1 ms
RGB Overshoot
5 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
23.1 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
23.1 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
13 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

5.3
Motion
CAD @ 60Hz
OD Transition 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
FreeSync (Faster)
Avg. CAD
310
Best 10% CAD
144
Worst 10% CAD
624

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 60Hz is disappointing. There's a bunch of blur, smearing, and even inverse ghosting on the 'Faster' overdrive, and the 'Extreme' overdrive has more inverse ghosting. The results are with the refresh rate in the monitor's OSD set to 165Hz, and setting it to 60Hz in the OSD results in worse inverse ghosting.

Motion
Response Time @ 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
FreeSync (Faster)
First Response Time
8.6 ms
Total Response Time
18.2 ms
RGB Overshoot
6 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
20.8 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
28.5 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
18 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

Motion
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Yes
Maximum Frequency
165 Hz
Minimum Frequency
120 Hz
Longest Pulse Width Brightness
54 cd/m²
Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
54 cd/m²
Pulse Width Control
No
Pulse Phase Control
No
Pulse Amplitude Control
No
VRR At The Same Time
No

Refresh RateMotion Photo
165HzPhoto
144HzPhoto
120HzPhoto

This monitor has an optional backlight strobing feature, otherwise known as black frame insertion. It only works with Refresh Rate in the OSD set to 165Hz, 144Hz, or 120Hz, and you can't enable VRR at the same time. While it reduces motion blur, there's image duplication, and it dims the screen. These results are with the refresh rate in the OSD set to 165Hz.

7.6
Motion
VRR Flicker
Dark Gray Flicker
1.7 RGB
Middle Gray Flicker
1.9 RGB
Light Gray Flicker
1.6 RGB

This monitor has noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates. It looks worse in person than the score and video indicate, as you can see it in dark scenes. That said, this isn't so much of an issue if your computer can maintain stable frame rates or if you disable VRR altogether.

10
Motion
Image Flicker
Flicker-Free
Yes
PWM Dimming Frequency
0 Hz

The backlight doesn't use pulse-width modulation and remains flicker-free at all brightness levels, which helps if you're sensitive to flicker.

Inputs
8.8
Inputs
Input Lag
Native Resolution @ Max Hz
4.6 ms
Native Resolution @ 120Hz
5.8 ms
Native Resolution @ 60Hz
9.9 ms
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
7.9 ms

The Samsung G51C has low input lag for a responsive feel, and it doesn't increase at lower refresh rates either, which is great.

7.5
Inputs
Resolution
Native Resolution
2560 x 1440
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Megapixels
3.7 MP
Pixel Density
109 PPI
4.9
Inputs
PS5 Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

This monitor works well with the PS5, but without HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, it can't take full advantage of everything the console offers. You need to disable FreeSync Premium on the monitor for 4k to work with the PS5, but the monitor's VRR support doesn't work with the PS5 anyway.

6.6
Inputs
Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

The Samsung Odyssey G51C works well with the Xbox Series X|S but can't take full advantage due to its lack of HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. You need to disable VRR on the monitor for 4k to work, and because the Xbox only supports HDR with 4k signals, you can't enable VRR and HDR at the same time.

Inputs
Inputs Photos
Inputs
Video And Audio Ports
DisplayPort
1 (DP 1.2)
Mini DisplayPort
No
HDMI
2 (HDMI 2.0)
HDMI 2.1 Rated Speed
No HDMI 2.1
DVI
No
VGA
No
Daisy Chaining
No
3.5mm Audio Out
1
3.5mm Audio In
No
HDR10
Yes
3.5mm Microphone In
No

Although Samsung advertises that it supports DisplayPort 1.4, it's limited to DisplayPort 1.2 bandwidth. Even the on-screen display confirms that it supports DisplayPort 1.2, as you can see here.

Inputs
USB
USB-A Ports
1 (Service Port Only)
USB-A Rated Speed
480Mbps (USB 2.0)
USB-B Upstream Port
No
USB-C Ports
0
USB-C Upstream
No USB-C Ports
USB-C Rated Speed
No USB-C Ports
USB-C Power Delivery
No USB-C Ports
USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
No USB-C Ports
Thunderbolt
No

You can only use the USB port with a USB drive for firmware updates.

Inputs
macOS Compatibility

This monitor works well with macOS, and there aren't any obvious issues. VRR works well, and while you can enable HDR, it looks washed out and has a cold color temperature. If you're using a MacBook, windows return to their original place when reopening the lid or after waking the laptop up from sleep.

Features
Features
Additional Features
Speakers
No
RGB Illumination
No
Multiple Input Display
No
KVM Switch
No

This entry-level monitor has limited features, and unlike some higher-end Samsung monitors, it doesn't support the Tizen smart platform either. However, it does have a few extra features that you can find in the OSD:

  • Black Equalizer: Adjusts gamma so that it's easier to see opponents in dark areas of games.
  • Eye Saver Mode: Removes blue light to help with eye strain.
  • Refresh Rate: Lets you change the refresh rate directly from the OSD.
  • Virtual Aim Point: Displays a virtual crosshair that your game's anti-cheat tool won't detect, giving you a competitive advantage.

Features
On-Screen Display (OSD)