Get insider access
Preferred store
Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available.
We've recently released Test Bench 2.0 for Monitors! Read our new VRR Flicker R&D Article and Pursuit Photo R&D Article to learn more.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 Monitor Review

Tested using Methodology v2.0
Review updated Apr 23, 2024 at 01:37 pm
Latest change: Writing modified Aug 05, 2024 at 04:25 pm
Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 Picture
6.1
PC Gaming
5.9
Console Gaming
6.9
Office
7.0
Editing
6.9
Brightness
4.7
Response Time
5.2
HDR Picture
6.5
SDR Picture
8.5
Color Accuracy

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 is a 27-inch, 1440p budget gaming monitor with a 1000R curve. It's also available in a 32-inch size and is very similar to the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55A S27AG55. It joins several other monitors in the budget gaming category, including the Dell G2724D. The Samsung has FreeSync VRR support and a high 165Hz refresh rate. It doesn't have many added features, like a USB hub, but it does have some of Samsung's gaming features, like Virtual Aim Point and Contrast Enhancer.

Our Verdict

6.1 PC Gaming

The Samsung G55C is mediocre for PC gaming. It has FreeSync VRR and is G-SYNC compatible, and its 165Hz refresh rate is good enough for most gamers. However, fast-moving objects are blurry, and it has issues with its input lag, so it doesn't feel responsive. It has okay picture quality as it displays deep blacks, but it lacks a local dimming feature and doesn't make highlights pop against the rest of the image, especially in HDR.

Pros
  • Good native contrast.
  • 165Hz refresh rate and VRR support.
Cons
  • Blurry motion with smearing.
  • High input lag at 165Hz and 60Hz.
  • No local dimming.
  • Noticeable VRR flicker with changing frame rates.
5.9 Console Gaming

The Samsung Odyssey G55C is disappointing for console gaming. The biggest downside is that it can't take full advantage of the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S due to the lack of HDMI 2.1 bandwidth. It also has limited picture quality, so HDR games don't look vivid, but it has a good native contrast ratio. Unfortunately, fast-moving objects are blurry, and while it has low input lag at 120Hz, its input lag increases a lot more at 60Hz, leading to a less responsive feel.

Pros
  • Good native contrast.
  • Low input lag at 120Hz.
Cons
  • Blurry motion with smearing.
  • High input lag at 165Hz and 60Hz.
  • Mediocre HDR color gamut and volume.
  • Can't take full advantage of gaming consoles.
6.9 Office

The Samsung G55C is okay for office work. It has good text clarity and gets bright enough to overcome glare, so you can see your work clearly in a brighter room. Its 27-inch screen is also large enough to open two windows side by side. However, it has terrible ergonomics, with no height or swivel adjustments, so it's difficult to place in your preferred position. Additionally, it has poor viewing angles, so sharing your work with others is difficult.

Pros
  • Good text clarity.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
Cons
  • Terrible ergonomics.
  • Poor viewing angles.
7.0 Editing

The Samsung G55C is decent for content creation. It has good text clarity, and its 27-inch screen is large enough to open two windows side by side. It also has great accuracy before calibration. However, it has poor viewing angles, and its stand doesn't swivel or have a height adjustment, so sharing your work with others is difficult. It also has limited coverage of HDR colors, which is a problem if you need to edit content with these colors.

Pros
  • Good native contrast.
  • Good text clarity.
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
  • Great accuracy before calibration.
Cons
  • Terrible ergonomics.
  • Poor viewing angles.
  • Mediocre HDR color gamut and volume.
  • No dedicated sRGB mode; needs full calibration for best accuracy.
6.9 Brightness

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has okay brightness. It gets bright enough to fight glare in most well-lit rooms, but it fails to make highlights pop in HDR.

Pros
  • Bright enough to fight glare.
Cons
  • Can't make highlights pop in HDR.
4.7 Response Time

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has a bad response time at any refresh rate. Motion looks blurry, and there's noticeable smearing with fast-moving objects.

Pros
Cons
  • Blurry motion with smearing.
  • Motion is worse with VRR on than with it off.
5.2 HDR Picture

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has disappointing HDR picture quality. Although it has a good enough native contrast ratio, it lacks a local dimming feature to improve that further and make small highlights pop against dark backgrounds. It also has a limited HDR color volume, so it fails to display bright and dark colors well.

Pros
  • Good native contrast.
Cons
  • No local dimming.
  • Mediocre HDR color gamut and volume.
6.5 SDR Picture

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has okay SDR picture quality. It displays deep blacks in dark rooms, but there's noticeable backlight bleed along the edges as it has poor black uniformity.

Pros
  • Good native contrast.
Cons
  • Noticeable backlight bleed.
8.5 Color Accuracy

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has excellent color accuracy. While it doesn't have a dedicated sRGB picture mode, its accuracy before calibration is still great and fine for most people. However, you still need to calibrate it if you need the most accurate colors.

Pros
  • Great accuracy before calibration.
Cons
  • No dedicated sRGB mode; needs full calibration for best accuracy.
  • 6.1 PC Gaming
  • 5.9 Console Gaming
  • 6.9 Office
  • 7.0 Editing

Performance Usages

  • 6.9 Brightness
  • 4.7 Response Time
  • 5.2 HDR Picture
  • 6.5 SDR Picture
  • 8.5 Color Accuracy
  1. Updated Aug 05, 2024: Clarified in the Variants section that it's also sold at Costco with a different model code.
  2. Updated May 10, 2024: Corrected a mistake in Refresh Rate as the max refresh rate with 10-bit signals over DisplayPort is 120Hz.
  3. Updated Apr 23, 2024: Updated text throughout the review according to Test Bench 2.0, mainly in the Verdict and Motion sections.
  4. Updated Apr 19, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0. This includes new tests for VRR Motion Performance, Refresh Rate Compliance, Cumulative Absolute Deviation (CAD), and VRR Flicker. You can read the full changelog here.
  5. Updated Apr 10, 2024: Added that the LG 27GR75Q-B has a better Horizontal Viewing Angle.
  6. Updated Apr 05, 2024: Added that the MSI G274QPF-QD has USB connectivity.
  7. Updated Mar 28, 2024: Review published.
  8. Updated Mar 22, 2024: Early access published.
  9. Updated Mar 18, 2024: Our testers have started testing this product.
  10. Updated Mar 07, 2024: The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon.
  11. Updated Feb 23, 2024: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

We tested the 27-inch Samsung G55C, which is also sold at Costco with a different full product code. This model is also available in a 32-inch size, although it's a different product, so we don't expect it to perform the same, and our results aren't valid for it.

Model Size Model Code Resolution Panel Type Refresh Rate
G5/G55C 27" LS27CG552EMXUE
LS27CG554ENXZA (Costco)
1440p VA 165Hz
G5/G55C 32" LS32CG552EMXUE 1440p VA 165Hz

Our unit was manufactured in November 2023; you can see the label here. We tested it with firmware M-C5500GGZA-1001.0.

Compared To Other Monitors

The Samsung G55C is a mediocre budget gaming monitor that doesn't match the performance of its competitors in most situations. While it has good contrast and brightness, other monitors in this category have substantially better overall performance. If you're looking for a monitor that performs better overall, take a look at the Dell G2724D. It's better for all uses, particularly gaming. While it has the same refresh rate as the Samsung, the Dell has far better motion handling, so fast-moving objects look crisp, and it has much lower input lag for a more responsive feel.

For more options, check out our recommendations for the best budget and cheap monitors, the best 1440p gaming monitors, and the best 27-inch gaming monitors.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G51C S27CG51 and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are both 27-inch gaming monitors. Despite the G5/G51C being marketed as a lower-end monitor, it has better gaming performance. The G5/G51C has a substantially better response time, so fast-moving objects look crisper, and the monitor has considerably lower latency. The G5/G51C also has better ergonomics, so placing it in your preferred position for a long gaming session is easier. However, the G5/G55C gets considerably brighter, and you may prefer it if you're regularly gaming in a brighter room.

Dell G2724D

The Dell G2724D and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are 27-inch gaming monitors. However, the Dell is the better monitor for most people. The Samsung has better contrast, and you may prefer it if you're gaming in a darker room. However, the Dell has better overall performance. The Dell gets considerably brighter and has better reflection handling, making it the better choice for brighter rooms. The Dell also has a far better response time, so fast-moving objects look crisp, and it has lower input lag for a more responsive feel. Additionally, the Dell has far better ergonomics, so it's easier to place in your preferred position for a long gaming session.

Samsung Odyssey G5/G55A S27AG55

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G55A S27AG55 and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are extremely similar 27-inch gaming monitors. The G5/G55C is a newer monitor that gets brighter, making it the better choice in a bright environment. However, the G5/G55A has considerably lower input lag and is the better choice if you want a responsive feel while gaming.

LG 32GN600-B

The LG 32GN600-B and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are entry-level 1440p gaming monitors with many similarities. Choosing one over the other really comes down to size as the LG has a bigger screen, but because of the smaller screen of the Samsung, it has higher pixel density for sharper text clarity.

Gigabyte G32QC

The Gigabyte G32QC and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are both entry-level gaming monitors with similar specs. The Gigabyte has a few extra perks, like a USB hub to connect your devices. The Gigabyte also has a more ergonomic stand, making adjusting easier. Lastly, the Gigabyte is the better choice if you need to use it in a well-lit room due to its higher brightness.

LG 27GN800-B

The LG 27GN800-B and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are both entry-level 1440p gaming monitors, but they have a few differences. Despite having a lower refresh rate than the Samsung monitor, the LG has a faster response time, which is great for playing games with fast-moving objects. The LG also has wider viewing angles, making it ideal for sharing your screen with friends. However, the Samsung monitor has a different panel type with a higher contrast ratio, which is great if you want to watch content or play games in dark rooms.

LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B

The LG 27GP850-B/27GP83B-B and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are 27-inch gaming monitors. However, the LG is the better monitor for most people. The Samsung has better contrast and displays deeper blacks in a dark room. However, the LG has better overall performance. The LG gets considerably brighter and has far better viewing angles, so you can better share content with friends or play a local co-op game. The LG also has far better motion handling, so fast-moving objects look crisp.

Gigabyte G27QC

The Gigabyte G27QC and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 have similar specs, but the Gigabyte has a few extra advantages. It has two USB-A ports, which the Samsung doesn't have, making it easier to connect devices. It also has lower input lag for a more responsive feel. Lastly, the Gigabyte offers height adjustment, making it easier to place in your ideal position.

Dell S2722DGM

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 and the Dell S2722DGM are entry-level 1440p gaming monitors with a few differences. While they each have a curved screen, the curve on the Samsung is more aggressive, which isn't ideal if you aren't used to using a curved screen. The Dell also has a more ergonomic stand, making placing it in an ideal position easier. Lastly, the Dell gets brighter, so it's the better choice if you need to use it in a well-lit room. However, the Samsung is the better choice for HDR gaming, as the Dell doesn't support HDR.

LG 27GL850-B/27GL83A-B

The LG 27GL850-B/27GL83A-B and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are both entry-level 1440p gaming monitors, but they have a few differences, mainly due to their panel types. The LG has wider viewing angles, making it the better choice for co-op gaming, while the Samsung has a higher contrast ratio, which is great for gaming in dark rooms. That said, despite the LG having a lower native refresh rate, it has much better motion handling, so fast-moving objects are sharper.

Dell S3222DGM

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 and the Dell S3222DGM are entry-level 1440p gaming monitors with a few differences, including the screen size. While they each have a curved screen, the curve on the Samsung is more aggressive, which isn't ideal if you aren't used to using a curved screen. The Dell also has a more ergonomic stand, making placing it in an ideal position easier. On the other hand, the Samsung is the better choice for HDR gaming, as the Dell doesn't support HDR at all.

Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx

The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are both 1440p gaming monitors with a few differences. They have different panel types, each with pros and cons. The Acer has wider viewing angles, which is great for co-op gaming, while the Samsung's higher contrast ratio makes it a better choice for gaming in dark rooms. When it comes to gaming, the Acer has an advantage as it has better motion handling.

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0)

The Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 1.0) and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are different types of entry-level gaming monitors, mainly due to their panel types and features. The Gigabyte is more well-rounded, with wider viewing angles and better motion handling, so it's better for gaming. The Gigabyte also has extra productivity perks like a USB-C port and a KVM switch that makes it easy to use two computers connected to the monitor with the same keyboard and mouse. On the other hand, the Samsung is the better choice if you want to use it in a dark room, as it has a higher contrast ratio.

Gigabyte G34WQC

The Gigabyte G34WQC and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are different types of gaming monitors. The main difference is that the Gigabyte has an ultrawide screen for a more immersive gaming experience, so choosing one over the other can come down to knowing if you want an ultrawide monitor.

AOC 24G15N

The Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 and the AOC 24G15N are both low-cost gaming monitors. The Samsung is the better choice for most people, as it gets much brighter and has a more detailed display. However, both monitors have similar motion handling, so if you want to spend as little as possible, the AOC could work well if you don't need the Samsung's extra brightness or sharpness.

Dell S3422DWG

The Dell S3422DWG and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are different types of gaming monitors. The Dell has an ultrawide screen, which is great for playing atmospheric or detailed games, while the 27-inch screen on the Samsung is better if you have limited space. They perform similarly otherwise, but the Dell has slightly better picture quality in HDR, as it gets a bit brighter, and the Dell has a few extra features like a USB hub, which the Samsung doesn't have.

HP OMEN 34c

The HP OMEN 34c and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are different types of 1440p gaming monitors. The main difference is that the HP has an ultrawide screen, providing a more immersive gaming experience. The HP also gets brighter, so it's the better choice if you want to use it in a well-lit room. Besides that, they perform similarly, so choosing one over the other really comes down to knowing if you want an ultrawide screen or not.

Dell S2721DGF

The Dell S2721DGF and the Samsung Odyssey G5/G55C S27CG55 are entry-level gaming monitors, but because of their different panel types, they have a few differences. The Dell has better overall motion handling, so it's better for gaming, as fast-moving objects are sharper. The Dell is also better for co-op gaming as it has wider viewing angles, and it's the superior choice if you need to use it in a well-lit room, thanks to its higher brightness and better reflection handling. However, the Samsung is better if you need to use it in a dark room as blacks appear deeper than on the Dell.

+ Show more

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Design
Design
Style
Curved
Yes
Curve Radius
1000R

The Samsung G55C has a simple, gamer-oriented aesthetic. It has a black plastic body with a tripod stand.

7.0
Design
Build Quality

The build quality is decent. The monitor body is solid, with no flex or plastic creaking. The plastic stand is also stable and solid, with no flexing. However, the tilt mechanism is extremely stiff and difficult to adjust.

1.7
Design
Ergonomics
Min Height To Top Of Panel
N/A
Height Adjustment
0.0" (0.0 cm)
Tilt Range
-17.5° to 2.5°
Rotate Portrait/Landscape
No
Swivel Range
No swivel
Wall Mount
VESA 75x75

The ergonomics are terrible, and it's hard to set the monitor to your preferred position or share your screen with others. Additionally, the tilt mechanism is very stiff and difficult to adjust. The stand features a loop for cable management.

Design
Stand
Base Width
21.9" (55.5 cm)
Base Depth
11.2" (28.5 cm)
Thickness (With Display)
9.3" (23.5 cm)
Weight (With Display)
9.3 lbs (4.2 kg)

The V-shaped feet provide enough space to put peripherals between them, and the monitor's stand provides quick wobble recovery.

Design
Display
Size
27"
Housing Width
24.2" (61.5 cm)
Housing Height
15.0" (38.0 cm)
Thickness (Without Stand)
4.7" (12.0 cm)
Weight (Without Stand)
8.4 lbs (3.8 kg)
Borders Size (Bezels)
0.4" (1.0 cm)
Design
Controls

A single joystick is located just below the Samsung branding at the center of the bottom bezel. This controls the on-screen menu and turns the monitor on and off.

Design
In The Box
Power Supply
External Brick

  • DisplayPort cable
  • HDMI cable
  • Power brick
  • Power cable
  • Documentation

Picture Quality
7.8
Picture Quality
Contrast
Native Contrast
2,922 : 1
Contrast With Local Dimming
N/A

The Samsung G55C has very good contrast, resulting in fairly deep blacks in a dark room. Unfortunately, there's no local dimming feature to improve black levels.

0
Picture Quality
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
No
Backlight
Edge

This monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature. We still film these videos on the monitor so you can compare the backlight performance with a monitor that has local dimming.

7.8
Picture Quality
SDR Brightness
Real Scene
319 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
334 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
335 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
335 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
335 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
336 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
334 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
335 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
335 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
335 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
335 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000
Minimum Brightness
38 cd/m²

The Samsung G55C has very good SDR brightness. It gets bright enough to fight glare and maintains its brightness well across different content. These results are from after calibration in the 'Original' Picture Mode with the Brightness at its max and Dynamic Brightness 'Off.'

6.3
Picture Quality
HDR Brightness
VESA DisplayHDR Certification
No Certification
Real Scene
327 cd/m²
Peak 2% Window
342 cd/m²
Peak 10% Window
342 cd/m²
Peak 25% Window
342 cd/m²
Peak 50% Window
342 cd/m²
Peak 100% Window
342 cd/m²
Sustained 2% Window
342 cd/m²
Sustained 10% Window
342 cd/m²
Sustained 25% Window
342 cd/m²
Sustained 50% Window
342 cd/m²
Sustained 100% Window
342 cd/m²
Automatic Brightness Limiting (ABL)
0.000

The HDR brightness is mediocre. It doesn't get bright enough to display the content creator's intention in games or movies and doesn't track the PQ EOTF well. Most scenes are slightly brighter than they should be, and there's a slow roll-off near the monitor's peak brightness, so highlights don't get the brightest they could. These results are from the 'Graphics' Picture Mode with Dynamic Brightness 'Off.'

5.3
Picture Quality
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Left
30°
Color Washout From Right
26°
Color Shift From Left
40°
Color Shift From Right
36°
Brightness Loss From Left
31°
Brightness Loss From Right
28°
Black Level Raise From Left
14°
Black Level Raise From Right
11°
Gamma Shift From Left
15°
Gamma Shift From Right
12°

Unfortunately, this monitor has a poor horizontal viewing angle. The curved screen helps compensate for this by bringing the sides of the screen closer to your field of view if you're sitting in front of the monitor. However, if you're sitting at the side of the monitor, it appears faded and washed out, so it's not ideal for co-op gaming or sharing content. If you want a monitor with a better horizontal viewing angle, check out the LG 27GR75Q-B.

4.9
Picture Quality
Vertical Viewing Angle
Color Washout From Below
25°
Color Washout From Above
25°
Color Shift From Below
26°
Color Shift From Above
26°
Brightness Loss From Below
29°
Brightness Loss From Above
29°
Black Level Raise From Below
8°
Black Level Raise From Above
7°
Gamma Shift From Below
14°
Gamma Shift From Above
13°

The vertical viewing angle is bad. The screen looks washed out if you stand up and look down at the monitor.

8.4
Picture Quality
Gray Uniformity
50% Std. Dev.
1.735%
50% DSE
0.141%

The gray uniformity is impressive, and there are minimal issues throughout the screen.

3.9
Picture Quality
Black Uniformity
Native Std. Dev.
3.384%
Std. Dev. w/ L.D.
N/A

The monitor has poor black uniformity. There's significant backlight bleed along the top and bottom of the monitor, though there isn't much cloudiness in the center of the screen. Unfortunately, there's no local dimming feature to improve black uniformity.

8.1
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Pre-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Original
sRGB Gamut Area xy
101.2%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
4.39
Color Temperature (Avg.)
7,393 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.13
Color dE (Avg.)
3.02
Contrast Setting
50
RGB Settings
0-0-0
Gamma Setting
0
Brightness Setting
50
Measured Brightness
371 cd/m²
Brightness Locked
No

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has great accuracy before calibration. The colors are fairly accurate, but the temperature is too cold, and the screen has a blue tint. The white balance is also mediocre, and most scenes are too bright.

The 'Original' Picture mode isn't an sRGB mode, so there aren't any locked-out settings.

9.3
Picture Quality
Color Accuracy (Post-Calibration)
Picture Mode
Original
sRGB Gamut Area xy
99.4%
White Balance dE (Avg.)
0.48
Color Temperature (Avg.)
6,510 K
Gamma (Avg.)
2.18
Color dE (Avg.)
2.25
Contrast Setting
48
RGB Settings
7-3-(-13)
Gamma Setting
0
Brightness Setting
9
Measured Brightness
99 cd/m²
ICC Profile
Download

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has incredible accuracy after calibration. The white balance is nearly perfect, as is the gamma curve, except that very bright scenes are slightly too bright. Most colors and the color temperature are nearly perfect, and the blue tint is completely gone.

9.1
Picture Quality
SDR Color Gamut
sRGB Coverage xy
99.1%
sRGB Picture Mode
Original
Adobe RGB Coverage xy
76.5%
Adobe RGB Picture Mode
Original

The SDR color gamut is fantastic, and the monitor has incredible coverage of the sRGB color space. However, it has more limited coverage of the Adobe RGB color space used in photo editing, and it doesn't display some colors accurately in that color space.

6.1
Picture Quality
HDR Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
No
DCI-P3 Coverage xy
76.5%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
Graphics
Rec. 2020 Coverage xy
54.8%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Graphics

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has a mediocre HDR color gamut. It has passable coverage of the DCI-P3 color space used by most current HDR content and has even worse coverage of the wider Rec. 2020 color space. It also displays several colors inaccurately in both HDR color spaces.

6.1
Picture Quality
HDR Color Volume
1,000 cd/m² DCI-P3 Coverage ICtCp
46.3%
DCI-P3 Picture Mode
Graphics
10,000 cd/m² Rec. 2020 Coverage ICtCp
19.9%
Rec. 2020 Picture Mode
Graphics

The HDR color volume is mediocre. It struggles to display a wide range of vivid colors well.

7.5
Picture Quality
Text Clarity
Pixel Type
VA
Subpixel Layout
RGB

The text clarity is good. With ClearType on (top photo), diagonal lines appear bolder. These photos are in Windows 10, and you can also see it in Windows 11 with ClearType on and with ClearType off.

7.2
Picture Quality
Reflections
Screen Finish
Semi-Gloss
Total Reflections
5.8%
Indirect Reflections
3.2%
Calculated Direct Reflections
2.6%

The reflection handling is decent. While it struggles opposite a bright window, it's fine if you have a few lights around.

9.8
Picture Quality
Gradient
Color Depth
10 Bit

The gradient handling is superb. There's almost no noticeable banding in any shade.

Motion
7.5
Motion
Refresh Rate
Native Refresh Rate
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP
165 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI
144 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over DP @ 10-bit
120 Hz
Max Refresh Rate Over HDMI @ 10-Bit
60 Hz

Due to bandwidth limitations, you can't reach the monitor's maximum refresh rate with 10-bit signals.

Motion
Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
Variable Refresh Rate
Yes
FreeSync
Yes
G-SYNC
Compatible (Tested)
VRR Maximum
165 Hz
VRR Minimum
< 20 Hz
VRR Supported Connectors
DisplayPort, HDMI

NVIDIAVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
HDMIN/AN/A

AMDVRR MinVRR Max
DisplayPort<20Hz165Hz
HDMI<20Hz144Hz

3.7
Motion
VRR Motion Performance
Recommended VRR OD Setting
Adaptive-Sync
Variable Overdrive Advertised
No
Avg. CAD
491
Best CAD
460
Worst CAD
542

Refresh RateCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
164HeatmapChartPhoto
144HeatmapChartPhoto
120HeatmapChartPhoto
100HeatmapChartPhoto
80HeatmapChartPhoto
60HeatmapChartPhoto

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has bad motion handling across its VRR range. Motion is blurry no matter the refresh rate, and there's noticeable smearing with fast-moving objects. There aren't any overdrive settings available with VRR enabled, and the CAD is so high that it passes the limits of the chart. You can see an alternative chart here.

4.8
Motion
Refresh Rate Compliance
Compliance @ Max Hz
31%
Compliance @ 120 FPS
40%
Compliance @ 60 FPS
58%

The refresh rate compliance is poor. It has a slow response time, and it can't make full color transitions between frames, leading to blurry motion.

5.3
Motion
CAD @ Max Refresh Rate
OD Transition Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Extreme
Avg. CAD
295
Best 10% CAD
91
Worst 10% CAD
680

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto
VRRHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at the max refresh rate of 165Hz is poor. You can use any of the Response Time overdrive settings if you disable VRR, in which case 'Extreme' performs the best as it has the fastest total response time. However, motion is still blurry with visible smearing, and it looks worse if you enable VRR.

Motion
Response Time @ Max Refresh Rate
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Extreme
First Response Time
13.2 ms
Total Response Time
14.4 ms
RGB Overshoot
2 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
33.0 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
33.0 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
14 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
VRRHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

5.3
Motion
CAD @ 120Hz
OD Transition 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Extreme
Avg. CAD
299
Best 10% CAD
90
Worst 10% CAD
688

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto
VRRHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 120Hz is poor. You can use any of the Response Time overdrive settings if you disable VRR, in which case 'Extreme' performs the best as it has the fastest total response time. However, motion is still blurry with visible smearing, and it looks worse if you enable VRR.

Motion
Response Time @ 120Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Extreme
First Response Time
13.4 ms
Total Response Time
14.5 ms
RGB Overshoot
2 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
33.6 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
33.6 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
13 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
VRRHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

5.4
Motion
CAD @ 60Hz
OD Transition 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Extreme
Avg. CAD
290
Best 10% CAD
89
Worst 10% CAD
653

Overdrive ModeCAD HeatmapRT ChartPursuit Photo
StandardHeatmapChartPhoto
FasterHeatmapChartPhoto
ExtremeHeatmapChartPhoto
VRRHeatmapChartPhoto

The CAD at 60Hz is poor. Like at higher refresh rates, the 'Extreme' Response Time setting has the fastest total response time, but motion still looks blurry. Unfortunately, there's even more smearing and blur if you use VRR.

Motion
Response Time @ 60Hz
Recommended Overdrive Setting
Extreme
First Response Time
12.6 ms
Total Response Time
13.8 ms
RGB Overshoot
2 RGB
Worst 10% First Response Time
29.6 ms
Worst 10% Total Response Time
29.6 ms
Worst 10% RGB Overshoot
13 RGB

Overdrive ModeFirst Response HeatmapTotal Response HeatmapRGB Overshoot Heatmap
StandardHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
FasterHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
ExtremeHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap
VRRHeatmapHeatmapHeatmap

Motion
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
Yes
Maximum Frequency
165 Hz
Minimum Frequency
165 Hz
Longest Pulse Width Brightness
120 cd/m²
Shortest Pulse Width Brightness
120 cd/m²
Pulse Width Control
No
Pulse Phase Control
No
Pulse Amplitude Control
No
VRR At The Same Time
No

This monitor has an optional backlight strobing feature to reduce image persistence. It's designed to only function when the monitor's refresh rate is set to 165Hz, and it doesn't work if VRR is enabled. Unfortunately, enabling backlight strobing results in significant image duplication, and you can't adjust it.

4.0
Motion
VRR Flicker
Dark Gray Flicker
3.3 RGB
Middle Gray Flicker
4.0 RGB
Light Gray Flicker
2.9 RGB

The Samsung Odyssey G55C has distracting VRR flicker with changing frame rates. It's most noticeable in dark scenes, but you can still notice it even in dark areas of brighter scenes. This is mainly an issue with changing frame rates, as there's less flicker with stable frame rates.

10
Motion
Image Flicker
Flicker-Free
Yes
PWM Dimming Frequency
0 Hz

The backlight remains flicker-free at all brightness levels, helping to reduce eye strain if you're sensitive to flicker.

Inputs
7.6
Inputs
Input Lag
Native Resolution @ Max Hz
12.9 ms
Native Resolution @ 120Hz
5.0 ms
Native Resolution @ 60Hz
25.4 ms
Backlight Strobing (BFI)
16.0 ms

The input lag is good overall. However, the monitor's lag at its maximum refresh rate and at 60Hz is much higher than at 120Hz. This means that gaming at 120Hz feels more responsive than gaming at the maximum refresh rate, which is very unusual. As a result, we tested input lag for this monitor on a different PC configuration and found nearly identical results.

7.5
Inputs
Resolution
Native Resolution
2560 x 1440
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Megapixels
3.7 MP
Pixel Density
109 PPI
4.9
Inputs
PS5 Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

This monitor works well enough with the PS5, but it can't take full advantage of it. Additionally, the monitor only works with 4k @ 60Hz signals from the PS5 if you turn off VRR in the monitor's settings.

6.6
Inputs
Xbox Series X|S Compatibility
4k @ 120Hz
No
4k @ 60Hz
Yes
1440p @ 120Hz
Yes
1440p @ 60Hz
Yes
1080p @ 120Hz
Yes
1080p @ 60Hz
Yes

This monitor works well with the Xbox Series X|S. However, the monitor only works with 4k @ 60Hz signals from the Xbox if you turn off VRR in the monitor's settings. As the Xbox only supports HDR in 4k, this means it doesn't support HDR and VRR at the same time with any signal from the console.

Inputs
Inputs Photos
Inputs
Video And Audio Ports
DisplayPort
1 (DP 1.2)
Mini DisplayPort
No
HDMI
1 (HDMI 2.0)
HDMI 2.1 Rated Speed
No HDMI 2.1
DVI
No
VGA
No
Daisy Chaining
No
3.5mm Audio Out
1
3.5mm Audio In
No
HDR10
Yes
3.5mm Microphone In
No
Inputs
USB
USB-A Ports
1 (Service Port Only)
USB-A Rated Speed
480Mbps (USB 2.0)
USB-B Upstream Port
No
USB-C Ports
0
USB-C Upstream
No USB-C Ports
USB-C Rated Speed
No USB-C Ports
USB-C Power Delivery
No USB-C Ports
USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode
No USB-C Ports
Thunderbolt
No

This monitor doesn't have any USB-C ports. If you want a gaming monitor with a USB-C port, check out the MSI G274QPF-QD.

Inputs
macOS Compatibility

ConnectionHDMI 2.0USB-C to DisplayPort
Max Refresh Rate144Hz120Hz
VRR RangeN/A65-120Hz
HDRYesNo

This monitor works well with macOS. When using a MacBook, windows return to their original position when reopening the lid or waking the laptop up from sleep.

Features
Features
Additional Features
Speakers
No
RGB Illumination
No
Multiple Input Display
No
KVM Switch
No

The monitor has a few gamer-focused features, including:

  • Virtual Aim Point: Adds crosshairs to the screen for more accurate aiming.
  • Contrast Enhancer: Adjusts the contrast to prevent excessive differences between bright and dark areas.
  • Eye Saver Mode: Reduces blue light levels to minimize eye strain.

Features
On-Screen Display (OSD)